This article aims to investigate the economic integration between the European Union and its neighbouring countries by exploring the location drivers of Italian Multinational Enterprises in 33 destination countries including the New Member States of the European Union and the European Neighbouring Countries. The article compares market- and efficiency-seeking motivations with asset-seeking strategies. The analysis is based on a mixed-methods approach. The quantitative analysis assesses the location determinants of 518 Italian Multinational Enterprises that invested in the area in the years 2003–2008, whereas qualitative information on strategic location decisions is collected by means of in-depth interviews with executives in two of the largest Italian Multinational Enterprises active in the region. Market-seeking considerations are still predominant drivers of location decisions in European Union Neighbouring Countries together with resource-seeking motivations. However, different Multinational Enterprises develop diversified strategies to increase their access to these areas, which are of increasing interest for global investors.
AltomonteC (2000) Economic determinants and institutional framework: FDI in economies in transition. Transnational Corporations9: 75–106
2.
AmighiniARabellottiR (2006) How do Italian footwear industrial districts face globalization?European Planning Studies14: 485–502
3.
Ascani A, Crescenzi R, Iammarino S, 2016 Economic institutions and the location strategies of European Multinationals in their geographic neighbourhood. Economic Geography, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2016.1179570
4.
AsieduE (2006) Foreign direct investment in Africa: the role of natural resources, market size, government policy, institutions and political instability. The World Economy29: 63–77
5.
Bank of Italy (2000) Le economie del Mediterraneo, Rome: Banca d’Italia
6.
BeckerSEggerPMerloV (2012) How low business tax rates attract MNE activity: Municipality-level evidence from Germany. Journal of Public Economics96: 698–711
7.
BeugelsdijkSMudambiR (2013) MNEs as border-crossing multi-location enterprises: the role of discontinuities in geographic space. Journal of International Business Studies44: 413–426
8.
Boschma R, Capone G, 2013 Relatedness and diversification in EU and ENP countries. SEARCH Working Paper WP2.4
9.
CantwellJ (2009) Location and the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies40: 35–41
10.
CarabelliAHirschGRabellottiR (2009) Italian SMEs and industrial districts on the move: where are they going?European and Planning Studies17: 19–41
11.
ChenMMooreM (2010) Location decision of heterogeneous multinational firms. Journal of International Economics80: 188–199
12.
CrescenziRPietrobelliCRabellottiR (2014) Innovation drivers, value chains and the geography of multinational corporations in Europe. Journal of Economic Geography14: 1053–1086
13.
Development Researchers’ Network, 2013 “Evaluation of the European Union’s Support to two European Neighbourhood Policy Regions (East and South)”, Evaluation carried out on behalf of the European Commission. Final Report, Volume 2, Annexes 1–10, Brussels
14.
DunfordM (2006) Industrial districts, magic circles, and the restructuring of the Italian textiles and clothing chain. Economic Geography82: 27–59
15.
DunningJ H (1981) International Production and the Multinational Enterprise, London: Allen & Unwin
16.
DunningJ H (1988) The eclectic paradigm of international production: a restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of International Business Studies19: 1–31
17.
DunningJ H (1993) Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy, Workingham: Addison-Wesley
18.
DunningJ HNarulaR (1996) Foreign Direct Investment and Governments: Catalysts for Economic Restructuring, London and New York: Routledge
19.
EkholmKForslidRMarkusenJ R (2007) Export-platform foreign direct investment. Journal of the European Economic Association5: 776–795
20.
European Commission, 2004 European neighbourhood policy strategy paper COM(2004) 373 final, Brussels
21.
European Commission, 2014 Implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy in 2013. Regional report: A partnership for democracy and shared prosperity with the southern Mediterranean partners, Joint Staff Working Document, Brussels, 27 March 2014
22.
GuimarãesPFigueiredoOWoodwardD (2000) Agglomeration and the location of foreign direct investment in Portugal. Journal of Urban Economics47: 115–135
23.
IammarinoSMcCannP (2013) Multinationals and Economic Geography: Location, Technology and Innovation, UK: Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
24.
McCannPMudambiR (2005) Analytical differences in the economics of geography: the case of the multinational firm. Environment and Planning A37: 1857–1876
25.
MeyerKMudambiRNarulaR (2011) Multinational enterprises and local contexts: the opportunities and challenges of multiple embeddedness. Journal of Management Studies48: 235–252
26.
Monastiriotis V, Borrell M, 2013 Origin of FDI and domestic productivity spillovers: does European FDI have a ‘productivity advantage’ in the ENP countries? SEARCH Working Paper WP2.13
27.
MontalbanoPNenciS (2014) Assessing the trade impact of the European Neighbourhood Policy on the EU-med free trade area. Applied Economics46. 2014
28.
NarulaR (1996) Multinational Investment and Economic Structure, London: Routledge
29.
NielsenP (ed.) (2008) International Sourcing. Moving Business Functions Abroad, Statistics Denmark: Kobenhavn
30.
NoorbakhshFPaloniAYoussedA (2001) Human capital and FDI inflows to developing countries: new empirical evidence. World Development29: 1593–1610
31.
Petrakos G, Kallioras D, Artelaris P, 2013, The geography of trade relations between the EU and the ENP countries: emerging patterns and policy recommendations. SEARCH Working Paper WP2.07
32.
PhelpsN A (1997) Multinationals and European Integration: Trade, Investment and Regional Development, London: Jessica Kingsley
33.
PhelpsN AWaleyP (2004) Capital versus the districts: A tale of one multinational company’s attempt to disembed itself. Economic Geography80: 191–215
34.
Pinna A M, 2013 Is the EU the best trade partner for its neighbors? SEARCH Working Paper WP2.02
35.
RabbiosiLSantangeloG D (2014) When in Rome, Do as the Romans Do: Subsidiary Autonomy as a Response to Corruption Distance, NY: Academy of Management
36.
ResminiL (2000) The determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in the CEECs: new evidence from sectoral patterns. Economics of Transition8: 665–689
37.
SchmidheinyKBrülhartM (2011) On the equivalence of location choice models: conditional logit, nested logit and Poisson. Journal of Urban Economics69: 214–222
38.
SchleiferAVishnyR W (1999) Grabbing Hand: Government Pathologies and Their Cures, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
39.
SilvaJ M C STenreyroS (2006) The log of gravity. Review of Economics and Statistics88: 641–658
40.
TurnockD (2001) Location trends for foreign direct investment in East Central Europe. Environment and Planning C19: 849–880
41.
UhlenbruckK (2004) Developing acquired foreign subsidiaries: the experience of MNEs in transition economies. Journal of International Business Studies35: 109–123
42.
van GeenhuizenMNijkampP (1998) Potentials for East – West integration: the case of foreign direct investment. Environment and Planning C16: 105–120
43.
WheelerDModyA (1992) International investment location decisions: the case of US firms. Journal of International Economics33: 57–76
YoungC (2005) Meeting the new foreign direct investment challenge in East and Central Europe: place-marketing strategies in Hungary. Environment and Planning C23: 733–757
