This paper elaborates on the interconnectedness of scale and discourse in environmental governance. It accentuates that the emergence and subsequent reconfiguration of a particular scalar structure of environmental governance is the outcome of the discursive contest among various political actors, whose discourses acquire persuasive power through employing scale to frame how the world should be observed. In so arguing this paper distinguishes two moments of scale, as material political–environmental relations being shaped and as device shaping political–environmental relations. The connections of these two moments are illustrated by a case study based in the Pearl River Delta region of China, where scalar-implicated discourses were constructed by various tiers of the state to influence the scaling of the urban planning system, now being an important domain to perform environmental governance. With a scalar-discursive attention, this paper seeks to move towards a more holistic treatment of the obscured operational complexities of politics of scale.
AgnewJ (1997) The dramaturgy of horizons: Geographical scale in the ‘Reconstruction of Italy’ by the new Italian political parties, 1992–1995. Political Geography16(2): 99–127.
2.
BoyleM (2002) Cleaning up after the Celtic Tiger: Scalar ‘fixes’ in the political ecology of Tiger economies. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers27(2): 172–194.
3.
BrennerN (1998) Between fixity and motion: accumulation, territorial organization and the historical geography of spatial scales. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space16(4): 459–481.
4.
BrennerN (2000) The urban question as a scale question: Reflects on Henri Lefebvre, urban theory and the politics of scale. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research24(2): 361–378.
5.
BrennerN (2001) The limits to scale? methodological reflections on scalar structuration. Progress in Human Geography25(4): 591–614.
6.
BrennerN (2004) Urban governance and the production of new state spaces in western Europe. Review of International Political Economy11(3): 591–614.
7.
BrownJCPurcellM (2005) There’s nothing inherent about scale: Political ecology, the local trap, and the politics of development in the Brazilian Amazon. Geoforum36(5): 607–624.
8.
BulkeleyH (2005) Reconfiguring environmental governance: Towards a politics of scales and networks. Political Geography24(8): 875–902.
9.
BulkeleyHBetsillM (2005) Rethinking sustainable cities: Multilevel governance and the ‘urban’ politics of climate change. Environmental Politics14(1): 42–63.
10.
CartierC (2005) City-space: Scale relations and China’s spatial administrative hierarchy. In: MaLJCWuF (eds) Restructuring the Chinese City, Oxon, UK: Routledge, pp. 21–38.
11.
Cartier C (2011) Urban growth, rescaling, and the spatial administrative hierarchy. Provincial China 3(1): 9–33.
12.
CastreeN (2008) Neoliberalising nature: The logics of deregulation and reregulation. Environment and Planning A40(1): 131–152.
13.
ChanRCKYaoS (2010) New trends in urban and regional governance in the Pearl River Delta Region. Asian Geographer27(1–2): 127–143.
14.
ChenJ-C (2013) Sustainable territories: Rural dispossession, land enclosures and the construction of environmental resources in China. Human Geography6(1): 102–118.
15.
ChienS (2013) Chinese eco-cities: A perspective of land-speculation-oriented entrepreneurialism. China Information27(2): 173–196.
ChungCKL (2015) Upscaling in progress: The reinvention of urban planning as an apparatus of environmental governance in China. In: WongTCHanSSZhangH (eds) Population Mobility, Urban Planning and Management in China, Cham, Switzerland: Springer, pp. 171–187.
18.
CohenABakkerK (2014) The eco-scalar fix: Rescaling environmental governance and the politics of ecological boundaries in Alberta, Canada. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space32(1): 128–146.
19.
CowellR (2003) Substitution and scalar politics: Negotiating environmental compensation in Cardiff Bay. Geoforum34(3): 343–358.
20.
CowellROwensS (2006) Governing space: Planning reform and the politics of sustainability. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy24(3): 403–421.
21.
FeindtPHOelsA (2005) Does discourse matter? Discourse analysis in environmental policy making. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning7(3): 161–173.
22.
Guangdong Provincial Government (GG) (2005) Pearl River Delta Urban Cluster Coordinated Development Plan. Unpublished government document.
23.
GibbsDJonasAEG (2001) Rescaling and regional governance: The English Regional Development Agencies and the environment. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy19(2): 269–288.
24.
Guangzhou Urban Planning Bureau (GZUPB) (1994) Guangzhou Master Plan (Outline). Unpublished government document.
25.
HallTHubbardP (1996) The entrepreneurial city: New urban politics, new urban geographies?Progress in Human Geography20(2): 153–174.
26.
HerodAWrightMW (2002) Introduction: Rhetorics of scale. In: HerodAWrightMW (eds) Geographies of Power: Placing Scale, Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 147–153.
27.
HuberMTEmelJ (2009) Fixed minerals, scalar politics: The weight of scale in conflicts over the ‘1872 Mining Law’ in the United States. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space41(2): 371–388.
28.
JonasAEG (1994) The scale politics of spatiality. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space12(3): 257–264.
29.
JonasAEGWhileAGibbsDC (2004) State modernization and local strategic selectivity after Local Agenda 21: Evidence from three northern English localities. Policy & Politics32(2): 151–168.
30.
JonesKT (1998) Scale as epistemology. Political Geography17(1): 25–28.
31.
KaupBZ (2008) Negotiating through nature: The resistant materiality and materiality of resistance in Bolivia’s natural gas sector. Geoforum39(5): 1734–1742.
32.
KeilRDebbanéA-M (2005) Scaling discourse analysis: Experiences from Hermanus, South Africa and Walvis Bay, Namibia. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning7(3): 257–276.
33.
KurtzHE (2003) Scale frames and counter-scale frames: Constructing the problem of environmental injustice. Political Geography22(8): 887–916.
34.
KythreotisAPJonasAEG (2012) Scaling sustainable development? How voluntary groups negotiate spaces of sustainability governance in the United Kingdom. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space30(3): 381–399.
35.
LemosMCAgrawalA (2006) Environmental governance. Annual Review of Environment and Resources31: 297–325.
36.
Li H (1987) Mayor Li Hao’s speech at the founding of Shenzhen Municipal Urban Planning Committee. China City Planning Review 3(1/2): 2–9.
37.
LiPYuanQLaiS (2001) To develop Guangzhou a city of mountain and water. City Planning Review25(3): 28–31.
38.
LiXYehAG-O (2004) Analyzing spatial restructuring of land use patterns in a fast growing region using remote sensing and GIS. Landscape and Urban Planning69: 335–354.
39.
LiYMiaoBLangG (2011) The local environmental state in China: A study of county-level cities in Suzhou. The China Quarterly205: 115–132.
40.
LieberthalKGLamptonDM (1992) Bureaucracy, Politics, and Decision Making in Post-Mao China, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
41.
LiljaMVinthagenS (2014) Sovereign power, disciplinary power and biopower: Resisting what power with what resistence?Journal of Political Power7(1): 107–126.
42.
LinGCS (2001) Metropolitan development in a transitional socialist economy: Spatial restructuring in the Pearl River Delta, China. Urban Studies38: 383–406.
43.
LinGCS (2009) Scaling-up regional development in globalizing China: Local capital accumulation, land-centred politics, and reproduction of space. Regional Studies43: 429–447.
44.
MacKinnonD (2011) Reconstructing scale: Towards a new scalar politics. Progress in Human Geography35(1): 21–36.
45.
MayS (2008) Ecological citizenship and a plan for sustainable development: Lessons from Huangbaiyu. City: Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action12(2): 237–244.
46.
McCannEJ (2003) Framing space and time in the city: Urban policy and the politics of spatial and temporal scale. Journal of Urban Affairs25(2): 159–178.
47.
NgMK (2004) Viewpoint: The role of urban planning in China’s sustainable development. Town Planning Review75(4): i–v.
48.
NgMK (2005) Planning cultures in two Chinese transitional cities: Hong Kong and Shenzhen. In: SanyalB (ed.) Comparative Planning Cultures, New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 113–143.
49.
NgMKXuJ (2014) Second metamorphosis? Urban restructuring and planning responses in Guangzhou and Shenzhen in the twenty-first century. In: AltrockUSchoonS (eds) Maturing Megacities: The Pearl River Delta in Progressive Transformation, Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer, pp. 29–60.
50.
OiJC (1995) The role of the local state in China’s transitional economy. The China Quarterly144: 1132–1149.
51.
PadtFArtsB (2014) Concepts of scale. In: PadtFOpdamPPolmanN (eds) Scale-Sensitive Governance of the Environment, Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 1–16.
52.
QianYWeingastBR (1996) China’s transition to markets: Market-preserving federalism, Chinese style. The Journal of Policy Reform1(2): 149–185.
53.
RydinY (2003) Conflict, Consensus, and Rationality in Environmental Planning: An Institutional Discourse Approach, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
54.
SayreNF (2005) Ecological and geographical scale: Parallels and potential for integration. Progress in Human Geography29(3): 21–36.
55.
Shenzhen Government (SG) (1997) Shenzhen Master Plan (1996–2010). Unpublished government document.
SmithN (1992) Geography, different and the politics of scale. In: DohertyJGrahamEMalekM (eds) Postmodernism and the Social Sciences, London, UK: Macmillan, pp. 57–79.
SwyngedouwE (1996) Neither global nor local: ‘Glocalization’ and the politics of scale. In: CoxK (ed.) Spaces of Globalization: Reasserting the Power of the Local, New York, NY: Guilford, pp. 137–166.
60.
SwyngedouwE (2000) Authoritarian governance, power, and the politics of rescaling. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space18(1): 63–76.
61.
SwyngedouwE (2004) Scaled geographies: Nature, place and the politics of scale. In: SheppardEMcMasterRB (eds) Scale and Geographic Inquiry, Oxford, UK: Blackwell, pp. 129–153.
62.
WhileAJonasAEGGibbsD (2010) From sustainable development to carbon control: Eco-state restructuring and the politics of urban and regional development. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers35(1): 76–93.
63.
WongCQianHZhouK (2008) In search of regional planning in China: The case of Jiangsu and the Yangtze Delta. Town Planning Review79(2–3): 295–329.
64.
WuFXuJYehAGO (2007) Urban Development in Post-reform China: State, Market, and Space, Oxon, UK: Routledge.
65.
Wu F (2015) Planning for Growth: Urban and Regional Planning in China. New York, NY: Routledge.
XuJ (2008) Governing city-regions in China: Theoretical issues and perspectives for regional strategic planning. Town Planning Review79(2–3): 157–186.
69.
Xu J (2015) Environmental discourses in China’s urban planning system: A scaled discourse-analytical perspective. Urban Studies. Epub ahead of print 10 February 2015. DOI: 10.1177/0042098015571054.
70.
XuJChungCKL (2014) ‘Environment’ as an evolving concept in China’s urban planning system. International Development Planning Review36(4): 391–412.
71.
XuJYehAGO (2003) Guangzhou. Cities20(5): 361–374.
72.
Xu J and Yeh A (2009) Decoding urban land governance: State reconstruction in contemporary Chinese cities. Urban Studies 46(3): 559–581.
73.
Xu Z and Yeh A (2014) Spatio-temporal development of foreign direct investment in Guangdong, China from 1980 to 2011. Asian Geographer 31(1): 31–57.
74.
ZhaoJ (2011) Towards Sustainable Cities in China: Analysis and Assessment of Some Chinese Cities in 2008, New York, NY: Springer.
75.
ZhuJM (2006) Two great challenges of China’s urban planning. Urban Planning Forum6: 27–31.
76.
ZhuJ (2004) Local developmental state and order in China’s urban development during transition. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research28(2): 424–447.
