This case study of collaborative regional spatial planning in the North West region of England seeks to understand if ‘network power’ provides a sufficient incentive for the politically stronger and institutionally established players (particularly local government) to adopt a more flexible approach to consensus building. An observed failure in this respect, due to the overwhelming strength of the parochial interests of local government under network governance, leads to a suggestion to incentivise greater collaboration and consensus building at the strategic level through what has been termed ‘meta-governed citizen power’.
AlbrechtsL (1999) “Planners as catalysts and initiators of change. The new structure plan for Flanders”. European Planning Studies7(5): 587–603
2.
AlbrechtsL (2006a) “Shifts in strategic spatial planning? Some evidence from Europe and Australia”. Environment and Planning A38(6): 1149–1170
3.
AlbrechtsL (2006b) “Bridge the gap: from spatial planning to strategic projects”. European Planning Studies14(10): 1487–1500
4.
AlbrechtsL (2011) “Transformative practices: where strategic spatial planning meets social innovation”. In: OosterlynckSVan den BroeckJAlbrechtsLMoulaertFVerhetselA (eds) Strategic Spatial Projects: Catalysts for Change, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 17–25
5.
AlbrechtsL (2012) “Reframing strategic spatial planning by using a coproduction perspective”. Planning Theory12(1): 46–63
6.
AlbrechtsLBalducciA (2013) “Practicing strategic planning: in search of critical features to explain the strategic character of plans”. disP – The Planning Review49(3): 16–27
7.
AlbrechtsLHealeyPKunzmannK R (2003) “Strategic spatial planning and regional governance in Europe”. Journal of the American Planning Association69(2): 113–129
8.
AllmendingerPHaughtonG (2009a) “Critical reflections on spatial planning”. Environment and Planning A41(11): 2544–2549
9.
AllmendingerPHaughtonG (2009b) “Soft spaces, fuzzy boundaries, and metagovernance: the new spatial planning in the Thames Gateway”. Environment and Planning A41(3): 617–633
10.
AllmendingerPHaughtonG (2012) “Post-political spatial planning in England: a crisis of consensus?”. Transactions37(1): 89–103
11.
AllmendingerPTewdwr-JonesM (2002) “The communicative turn in urban planning: unravelling paradigmatic, imperialistic and moralistic dimensions”. Space and Polity6(1): 5–24
12.
AnsellCGashA (2008) “Collaborative governance in theory and practice”. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory18(4): 543–571
13.
ArnsteinS R (1969) “A ladder of citizen participation”. Journal of the American Institute of Planners35(4): 216–224
14.
BadenT (2013) “Government expectations of regional spatial strategies”. In: SwainCMarshallTBadenT (eds) English Regional Planning 2000-2010; Lessons for the Future, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 113–134
15.
Baker M, 1996a, “Return to the regions: a review of English Regional Planning Guidance”, Occasional paper 51, Department of Planning and Landscape, University of Manchester, Manchester
16.
BakerM (1996b) “The Trans-Pennine Corridor: a geographical fact?”. The Regional Review6(2): 2–4
17.
BakerM (1998) “Planning for the English regions: a review of the Secretary of State's Regional Planning Guidance”. Planning Practice and Research13(2): 153–169
18.
BakerM (2002) “Government Offices for the regions and regional planning”. In: MarshallTGlassonJWilsonE (eds) Contemporary Issues in Regional Planning, Basingstoke: Ashgate, pp. 70–87
19.
BakerMDeasIWongC (1999) “Obscure ritual or administrative luxury? Integrating strategic planning and regional development”. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design26: 763–782
20.
BakerMHincksSSherriffG (2010) “Getting involved in plan making: participation and stakeholder involvement in local and regional spatial strategies in England”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy28(4): 574–594
21.
Baker M, Sherriff G, 2009, “Stakeholder involvement in the North West Regional Spatial Strategy”, WP1, Centre for Urban Policy Studies (CUPS), University of Manchester, Manchester
22.
BakerMWongC (2013) “The delusion of strategic spatial planning: what's left after the Labour government's English regional experiment?”. Planning Practice and Research28(1): 83–103
23.
BalducciAFedeliVPasquiG (2011) Strategic Planning for Contemporary Urban Regions: City of Cities: A Project for Milan, Farnham: Ashgate
24.
BarkerK (2004) Review of Housing Supply: Final Report – Recommendations, Norwich: HMSO
25.
BarkerK (2006) Review of Land Use Planning: Final Report – Recommendations, Norwich: HMSO
26.
BishopPDavisG (2002) “Mapping public participation in policy choices”. Australian Journal of Public Administration61(1): 14–29
27.
BooherD EInnesJ E (2002) “Network power in collaborative planning”. Journal of Planning Education and Research21(3): 221–236
28.
BurchMHollidayI (1993) “Institutional emergence: the case of the North West region of England”. Regional Politics and Policy3(2): 29–50
29.
Campbell-VoytalK (2010) “Phases of ‘pre-engagement’ capacity building: discovery, exploration, and trial alliance”. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action4(2): 155–162
30.
ChoguillM B G (1996) “A ladder of community participation for underdeveloped countries”. Habitat International20(3): 431–444
31.
Collins K, Ison R, 2006, “Dare we jump off Arnstein's ladder? Social learning as a new policy paradigm”, proceedings of PATH (Participatory Approaches in Science & Technology) Conference, Edinburgh, UK, 4–7 June; copy from the Open University
32.
CollinsKIsonR (2009) “Jumping off Arnstein's ladder: social learning as a new policy paradigm for climate change adaptation”. Environmental Policy and Governance19(6): 358–373
33.
ConnorD M (1988) “A new ladder of citizen participation”. National Civic Review77(3): 249–257
34.
CornwallA (2008) “Unpacking ‘participation’: models, meanings and practices”. Community Development Journal43(3): 269–283
35.
CullingworthBNadinV (2006) Town and Country Planning in the UK, 14th. Abingdon: Routledge
36.
Cumbria Strategic Partnership (CSP) (2008) Cumbria Sub Regional Spatial Strategy 2008 to 2028, Carlisle: Cumbria Strategic Partnership
Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions (DTLR) (2002) Your Region, Your Choice: Revitalising the English Regions, London: HMSO
40.
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR) (1998) The Future of Regional Planning Guidance: Consultation Paper, London: Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions
European Communities (1999) European Spatial Development Perspective, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities
43.
Examination in Public (EiP) Panel (2007) North West Draft Regional Spatial Strategy: Examination in Public – Report of the Panel, Bristol: Examination in Public Panel
HagerC (2012) “Revisiting the ungovernability debate: regional governance and sprawl in the USA and UK”. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research36(4): 817–830
51.
HarrisonJ (2013) “Configuring the new ‘regional world’: on being caught between territory and networks”. Regional Studies47(1): 55–74
52.
HaughtonGAllmendingerPCounsellDVigarG (2010) The New Spatial Planning: Territorial Management with Soft Spaces and Fuzzy Boundaries, Abingdon: Routledge
53.
HaughtonGCounsellD (2004) Regions, Spatial Strategies and Sustainable Development, Abingdon: Routledge
54.
HarrisN (2002) “Collaborative planning: from theoretical foundations to practice forms”. In: AllmendingerPTewdwr-JonesM (eds) Planning Futures: New Directions for Planning Theory, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 21–43
55.
HayC (1999) “Crisis and the structural transformation of the state: interrogating the process of change”. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations1(3): 317–344
56.
HealeyP (1996) “The communicative turn in planning theory and its implications for spatial strategy formations”. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design23(2): 217–234
HealeyP (1998) “Collaborative planning in a stakeholder society”. Town Planning Review69(1): 1–21
59.
HealeyP (2003a) “Collaborative planning in perspective”. Planning Theory2(2): 101–123
60.
HealeyP (2003b) “The revival of strategic spatial planning in Europe”. In: HealeyPKhakeeAMotteANeedhamB (eds) Making Strategic Spatial Plans: Innovation in Europe, London: Routledge, pp. 3–19
61.
HealeyP (2012) “Strategic planning for contemporary urban regions: city of cities: a project for Milan”. Planning Theory and Practice13(3): 497–498
62.
HillierJ (2003) “Agon’izing over consensus: why Habermasian ideals cannot be ‘real’”. Planning Theory2(1): 37–59
63.
HM Government (1998) Regional Development Agencies Act 1998, London: TSO
64.
HM Government (2004) Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, London: HMSO
65.
HM Government (2009) Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009, Norwich: TSO
66.
HM Treasury (2007) Review of Sub-National Economic Development and Regeneration, London: HM Treasury
HuxleyM (2000) “The limits to communicative planning”. Journal of Planning Education and Research19(4): 369–377
69.
HuxleyMYiftachelO (2000) “New paradigm or old myopia? Unsettling the communicative turn in planning theory”. Journal of Planning Education and Research19(4): 333–342
70.
InnesJ E (2004) “Consensus building: clarifications for the critics”. Planning Theory3(1): 5–20
71.
InnesJ EBooherD E (1999) “Consensus building and complex adaptive systems”. Journal of the American Planning Association65(4): 412–423
72.
InnesJ EBooherD E (2003) “Collaborative policy making: governance through dialogue”. In: HajerMWagenaarH (eds) Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 33–59
73.
JessopB (1997) “Capitalism and its future: remarks on regulation, government and governance”. Review of International Political Economy4(3): 561–581
74.
JessopB (1998) “The rise of governance and the risks of failure: the case of economic development”. International Social Science Journal50(155): 29–45
75.
JessopB (2003) “Governance and meta-governance: on reflexivity, requisite variety and requisite irony”. In: BangH (eds) Governance as Social and Political Communication, Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 101–116
76.
JonesG W (1988) “The crisis in British central-local government relationships”. Governance1(2): 162–183
77.
KumarAPaddisonR (2000) “Trust and collaborative planning theory: the case of the Scottish planning system”. International Planning Studies5(2): 205–223
78.
KunzmannK R (2013) “Strategic planning: a chance for spatial innovation and creativity”. disP – The Planning Review49(3): 28–31
79.
LeleS M (1991) “Sustainable development: a critical review”. World Development19(6): 607–621
80.
ListerR (1998) “From equality to social inclusion: New Labour and the welfare state”. Critical Social Policy18(55): 215–225
81.
MacCallumDMoulaertFHillierJHaddockS V (2009) “Introduction”. In: MacCallumDMoulaertFHillierJHaddockS V (eds) Social Innovation and Territorial Development, Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 1–10
82.
MargerumR D (2001) “Organisational commitment to integrated and collaborative management: matching strategies to constraints”. Environmental Management28(4): 421–431
83.
MargerumR D (2002) “Collaborative planning: building consensus and building a distinct model for practice”. Journal of Planning Education and Research21(2): 237–253
84.
MarshallT (2003) “English regional planning: recent progress and current government proposals”. Planning Practice and Research18(1): 81–93
85.
MouffeC (2000) The Democratic Paradox, London: Verso
86.
MussonSTickellAJohnP (2005) “A decade of decentralisation? Assessing the role of the Government Offices for the English regions”. Environment and Planning A37(8): 1395–1412
87.
NewmanP (2008) “Strategic spatial planning: collective action and moments of opportunity”. European Planning Studies16(10): 1371–1383
88.
Northern Way Steering Group (NWSG) (2004) Moving Forward: The Northern Way – First Growth Strategy Report: Summary, Newcastle upon Tyne: Northern Way Steering Group
89.
Northwest Regional Development Agency (NWDA), 4NW (2010) Future North West: Our Shared Priorities, Warrington: Northwest Regional Development Agency, North West Regional Leaders Board
90.
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) (2004) Planning Policy Statement 11: Regional Spatial Strategies, Norwich: TSO
91.
OlesenK (2012) “Soft spaces as vehicles for neoliberal transformations of strategic spatial planning?”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy30(5): 910–923
92.
OlesenKRichardsonT (2012) “Strategic planning in transition: contested rationalities and spatial logics in twenty-first century Danish planning experiments”. European Planning Studies20(10): 1689–1706
93.
OosterlynckSVan den BroeckJAlbrechtsLMoulaertFVerhetselA (2011) Strategic Spatial Projects: Catalysts for Change, Abingdon: Routledge
94.
PearceGAyresS (2006) “New patterns of governance in the English region: assessing their implications for spatial planning”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy24(6): 909–927
95.
PearceGMawsonJAyresS (2008) “Regional governance in England: a changing role for the government's Regional Offices?”. Public Administration86(2): 443–463
96.
RaelinJ (2006) “Does action learning promote collaborative leadership?”. Academy of Management Learning and Education5(2): 152–168
97.
RaelinJ (2011) “From leadership-as-practice to leaderful practice”. Leadership7(2): 195–211
98.
RaelinJ ARaelinJ D (2006) “Developmental action learning: toward collaborative change”. Action Learning: Research and Practice3(1): 45–67
99.
ReedM S (2008) “Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review”. Biological Conservation141(10): 2417–2431
100.
RiddellC (2013) “Coalescing views around a strategy”. In: SwainCMarshallTBadenT (eds) English Regional Planning 2000-2010; Lessons for the Future, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 9–30
101.
RobertsP (1996) “Regional Planning Guidance in England and Wales: back to the future?”. The Town Planning Review67(1): 97–109
102.
Roberts ShawP WLloydM G (2000) “Regional Development Agencies in England: new strategic regional planning issues?”. Regional Studies34(1): 75–79
103.
StephensonRPoxonJ (2001) “Regional strategy making and the new structures and processes for regional governance”. Local Government Studies27(1): 109–124
WannopU A (1995) The Regional Imperative: Regional Planning and Governance in Britain, Europe and the United States, London: Regional Studies Association/Jessica Kingsley Publishers
109.
WhiteheadM (2003) “‘In the shadow of hierarchy’: meta-governance, policy reform and urban regeneration in the West Midlands”. Area35(1): 6–14
110.
YiftachelOHuxleyM (2000) “Debating dominance and relevance: notes on the ‘communicative turn’ in planning theory”. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research24(4): 907–913
111.
Ziafati Bafarasat A, 2014, The Application of Strategic Spatial Planning Under Regionalist and Localist Approaches to Public Policy, PhD thesis, School of Environment and Development, University of Manchester
112.
Ziafati BafarasatA (2015) “Reflections on the three schools of thought on strategic spatial planning”. Journal of Planning Literature30(2): 132–148
113.
Ziafati BafarasatA (2016) “Exploring new systems of regionalism: an English case study”. Cities: The International Journal of Urban Policy and Planning50: 119–128
