Building consensus for network power? Some reflections on strategic spatial planning in the North West region of England

Abstract

This case study of collaborative regional spatial planning in the North West region of England seeks to understand if ‘network power’ provides a sufficient incentive for the politically stronger and institutionally established players (particularly local government) to adopt a more flexible approach to consensus building. An observed failure in this respect, due to the overwhelming strength of the parochial interests of local government under network governance, leads to a suggestion to incentivise greater collaboration and consensus building at the strategic level through what has been termed ‘meta-governed citizen power’.

Keywords

strategic (regional) planning network power consensus building influence differentials meta-governed citizen power North West England

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albrechts

(1999) “Planners as catalysts and initiators of change. The new structure plan for Flanders”. European Planning Studies 7(5): 587–603

Albrechts

(2006a) “Shifts in strategic spatial planning? Some evidence from Europe and Australia”. Environment and Planning A 38(6): 1149–1170

Albrechts

(2006b) “Bridge the gap: from spatial planning to strategic projects”. European Planning Studies 14(10): 1487–1500

Albrechts

(2011) “Transformative practices: where strategic spatial planning meets social innovation”. In: Oosterlynck

Van den Broeck

Albrechts

Moulaert

Verhetsel

(eds) Strategic Spatial Projects: Catalysts for Change, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 17–25

Albrechts

(2012) “Reframing strategic spatial planning by using a coproduction perspective”. Planning Theory 12(1): 46–63

Albrechts

Balducci

(2013) “Practicing strategic planning: in search of critical features to explain the strategic character of plans”. disP – The Planning Review 49(3): 16–27

Albrechts

Healey

Kunzmann

K R

(2003) “Strategic spatial planning and regional governance in Europe”. Journal of the American Planning Association 69(2): 113–129

Allmendinger

Haughton

(2009a) “Critical reflections on spatial planning”. Environment and Planning A 41(11): 2544–2549

Allmendinger

Haughton

(2009b) “Soft spaces, fuzzy boundaries, and metagovernance: the new spatial planning in the Thames Gateway”. Environment and Planning A 41(3): 617–633

10.

Allmendinger

Haughton

(2012) “Post-political spatial planning in England: a crisis of consensus?”. Transactions 37(1): 89–103

11.

Allmendinger

Tewdwr-Jones

(2002) “The communicative turn in urban planning: unravelling paradigmatic, imperialistic and moralistic dimensions”. Space and Polity 6(1): 5–24

12.

Ansell

Gash

(2008) “Collaborative governance in theory and practice”. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18(4): 543–571

13.

Arnstein

S R

(1969) “A ladder of citizen participation”. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35(4): 216–224

14.

Baden

(2013) “Government expectations of regional spatial strategies”. In: Swain

Marshall

Baden

(eds) English Regional Planning 2000-2010; Lessons for the Future, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 113–134

15.

Baker M, 1996a, “Return to the regions: a review of English Regional Planning Guidance”, Occasional paper 51, Department of Planning and Landscape, University of Manchester, Manchester

16.

Baker

(1996b) “The Trans-Pennine Corridor: a geographical fact?”. The Regional Review 6(2): 2–4

17.

Baker

(1998) “Planning for the English regions: a review of the Secretary of State's Regional Planning Guidance”. Planning Practice and Research 13(2): 153–169

18.

Baker

(2002) “Government Offices for the regions and regional planning”. In: Marshall

Glasson

Wilson

(eds) Contemporary Issues in Regional Planning, Basingstoke: Ashgate, pp. 70–87

19.

Baker

Deas

Wong

(1999) “Obscure ritual or administrative luxury? Integrating strategic planning and regional development”. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 26: 763–782

20.

Baker

Hincks

Sherriff

(2010) “Getting involved in plan making: participation and stakeholder involvement in local and regional spatial strategies in England”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 28(4): 574–594

21.

Baker M, Sherriff G, 2009, “Stakeholder involvement in the North West Regional Spatial Strategy”, WP1, Centre for Urban Policy Studies (CUPS), University of Manchester, Manchester

22.

Baker

Wong

(2013) “The delusion of strategic spatial planning: what's left after the Labour government's English regional experiment?”. Planning Practice and Research 28(1): 83–103

23.

Balducci

Fedeli

Pasqui

(2011) Strategic Planning for Contemporary Urban Regions: City of Cities: A Project for Milan, Farnham: Ashgate

24.

Barker

(2004) Review of Housing Supply: Final Report – Recommendations, Norwich: HMSO

25.

Barker

(2006) Review of Land Use Planning: Final Report – Recommendations, Norwich: HMSO

26.

Bishop

Davis

(2002) “Mapping public participation in policy choices”. Australian Journal of Public Administration 61(1): 14–29

27.

Booher

D E

Innes

J E

(2002) “Network power in collaborative planning”. Journal of Planning Education and Research 21(3): 221–236

28.

Burch

Holliday

(1993) “Institutional emergence: the case of the North West region of England”. Regional Politics and Policy 3(2): 29–50

29.

Campbell-Voytal

(2010) “Phases of ‘pre-engagement’ capacity building: discovery, exploration, and trial alliance”. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action 4(2): 155–162

30.

Choguill

M B G

(1996) “A ladder of community participation for underdeveloped countries”. Habitat International 20(3): 431–444

31.

Collins K, Ison R, 2006, “Dare we jump off Arnstein's ladder? Social learning as a new policy paradigm”, proceedings of PATH (Participatory Approaches in Science & Technology) Conference, Edinburgh, UK, 4–7 June; copy from the Open University

32.

Collins

Ison

(2009) “Jumping off Arnstein's ladder: social learning as a new policy paradigm for climate change adaptation”. Environmental Policy and Governance 19(6): 358–373

33.

Connor

D M

(1988) “A new ladder of citizen participation”. National Civic Review 77(3): 249–257

34.

Cornwall

(2008) “Unpacking ‘participation’: models, meanings and practices”. Community Development Journal 43(3): 269–283

35.

Cullingworth

Nadin

(2006) Town and Country Planning in the UK, 14th. Abingdon: Routledge

36.

Cumbria Strategic Partnership (CSP) (2008) Cumbria Sub Regional Spatial Strategy 2008 to 2028, Carlisle: Cumbria Strategic Partnership

37.

Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG), 2013, “Historic first as neighbourhood plan is voted in by community”, Department for Communities and Local Government, London, https://www.gov.uk/government/news/historic-first-as-neighbourhood-plan-is-voted-in-by-community

38.

Department for Transport (DfT), 2006, “Letter to the North West Regional Assembly and Regional Development Agency”, Department for Transport, The National Archives, Surrey, http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20081205143343/http://dft.gov.uk/pgr/regional/strategy/rfa/rfa1/response1/lettertothenorthwestregional3775

39.

Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions (DTLR) (2002) Your Region, Your Choice: Revitalising the English Regions, London: HMSO

40.

Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR) (1998) The Future of Regional Planning Guidance: Consultation Paper, London: Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions

41.

DETR (2000) Planning Policy Guidance Note 11: Regional Planning, London: HMSO

42.

European Communities (1999) European Spatial Development Perspective, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities

43.

Examination in Public (EiP) Panel (2007) North West Draft Regional Spatial Strategy: Examination in Public – Report of the Panel, Bristol: Examination in Public Panel

44.

4NW, 2010a, “Preparing ‘The North West of England Plan’”, North West Regional Leaders Board, Wigan, http://www.4nw.org.uk/articles/article.php?page_id=476

45.

4NW, 2010b, “How Future North West was developed”, North West Regional Leaders Board, Wigan, http://www.4nw.org.uk/articles/article.php?page_id=760

46.

Government Office for the North West (GONW) (1996) Regional Planning Guidance for the North West (RPG13), Norwich: HMSO

47.

GONW (2003) Regional Planning Guidance for the North West (RPG13), London: TSO

48.

GONW (2008) North West of England Plan; Regional Spatial Strategy to 2021, London: TSO

49.

Government Offices (GOs), 2010, “About the network”, Government Offices for the English Regions, The National Archives, Surrey, http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100528142817/http:/www.gos.gov.uk/aboutusnat/

50.

Hager

(2012) “Revisiting the ungovernability debate: regional governance and sprawl in the USA and UK”. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 36(4): 817–830

51.

Harrison

(2013) “Configuring the new ‘regional world’: on being caught between territory and networks”. Regional Studies 47(1): 55–74

52.

Haughton

Allmendinger

Counsell

Vigar

(2010) The New Spatial Planning: Territorial Management with Soft Spaces and Fuzzy Boundaries, Abingdon: Routledge

53.

Haughton

Counsell

(2004) Regions, Spatial Strategies and Sustainable Development, Abingdon: Routledge

54.

Harris

(2002) “Collaborative planning: from theoretical foundations to practice forms”. In: Allmendinger

Tewdwr-Jones

(eds) Planning Futures: New Directions for Planning Theory, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 21–43

55.

Hay

(1999) “Crisis and the structural transformation of the state: interrogating the process of change”. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 1(3): 317–344

56.

Healey

(1996) “The communicative turn in planning theory and its implications for spatial strategy formations”. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 23(2): 217–234

57.

Healey

(1997) Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies, Vancouver: UBC Press

58.

Healey

(1998) “Collaborative planning in a stakeholder society”. Town Planning Review 69(1): 1–21

59.

Healey

(2003a) “Collaborative planning in perspective”. Planning Theory 2(2): 101–123

60.

Healey

(2003b) “The revival of strategic spatial planning in Europe”. In: Healey

Khakee

Motte

Needham

(eds) Making Strategic Spatial Plans: Innovation in Europe, London: Routledge, pp. 3–19

61.

Healey

(2012) “Strategic planning for contemporary urban regions: city of cities: a project for Milan”. Planning Theory and Practice 13(3): 497–498

62.

Hillier

(2003) “Agon’izing over consensus: why Habermasian ideals cannot be ‘real’”. Planning Theory 2(1): 37–59

63.

HM Government (1998) Regional Development Agencies Act 1998, London: TSO

64.

HM Government (2004) Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, London: HMSO

65.

HM Government (2009) Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009, Norwich: TSO

66.

HM Treasury (2007) Review of Sub-National Economic Development and Regeneration, London: HM Treasury

67.

House of Commons, 1998, “Memorandum by Government Office for the North West (H 183)”, Parliament, London, http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199798/cmselect/cmenvtra/495-v/8031802.htm

68.

Huxley

(2000) “The limits to communicative planning”. Journal of Planning Education and Research 19(4): 369–377

69.

Huxley

Yiftachel

(2000) “New paradigm or old myopia? Unsettling the communicative turn in planning theory”. Journal of Planning Education and Research 19(4): 333–342

70.

Innes

J E

(2004) “Consensus building: clarifications for the critics”. Planning Theory 3(1): 5–20

71.

Innes

J E

Booher

D E

(1999) “Consensus building and complex adaptive systems”. Journal of the American Planning Association 65(4): 412–423

72.

Innes

J E

Booher

D E

(2003) “Collaborative policy making: governance through dialogue”. In: Hajer

Wagenaar

(eds) Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 33–59

73.

Jessop

(1997) “Capitalism and its future: remarks on regulation, government and governance”. Review of International Political Economy 4(3): 561–581

74.

Jessop

(1998) “The rise of governance and the risks of failure: the case of economic development”. International Social Science Journal 50(155): 29–45

75.

Jessop

(2003) “Governance and meta-governance: on reflexivity, requisite variety and requisite irony”. In: Bang

(eds) Governance as Social and Political Communication, Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 101–116

76.

Jones

G W

(1988) “The crisis in British central-local government relationships”. Governance 1(2): 162–183

77.

Kumar

Paddison

(2000) “Trust and collaborative planning theory: the case of the Scottish planning system”. International Planning Studies 5(2): 205–223

78.

Kunzmann

K R

(2013) “Strategic planning: a chance for spatial innovation and creativity”. disP – The Planning Review 49(3): 28–31

79.

Lele

S M

(1991) “Sustainable development: a critical review”. World Development 19(6): 607–621

80.

Lister

(1998) “From equality to social inclusion: New Labour and the welfare state”. Critical Social Policy 18(55): 215–225

81.

MacCallum

Moulaert

Hillier

Haddock

S V

(2009) “Introduction”. In: MacCallum

Moulaert

Hillier

Haddock

S V

(eds) Social Innovation and Territorial Development, Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 1–10

82.

Margerum

R D

(2001) “Organisational commitment to integrated and collaborative management: matching strategies to constraints”. Environmental Management 28(4): 421–431

83.

Margerum

R D

(2002) “Collaborative planning: building consensus and building a distinct model for practice”. Journal of Planning Education and Research 21(2): 237–253

84.

Marshall

(2003) “English regional planning: recent progress and current government proposals”. Planning Practice and Research 18(1): 81–93

85.

Mouffe

(2000) The Democratic Paradox, London: Verso

86.

Musson

Tickell

John

(2005) “A decade of decentralisation? Assessing the role of the Government Offices for the English regions”. Environment and Planning A 37(8): 1395–1412

87.

Newman

(2008) “Strategic spatial planning: collective action and moments of opportunity”. European Planning Studies 16(10): 1371–1383

88.

Northern Way Steering Group (NWSG) (2004) Moving Forward: The Northern Way – First Growth Strategy Report: Summary, Newcastle upon Tyne: Northern Way Steering Group

89.

Northwest Regional Development Agency (NWDA), 4NW (2010) Future North West: Our Shared Priorities, Warrington: Northwest Regional Development Agency, North West Regional Leaders Board

90.

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) (2004) Planning Policy Statement 11: Regional Spatial Strategies, Norwich: TSO

91.

Olesen

(2012) “Soft spaces as vehicles for neoliberal transformations of strategic spatial planning?”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 30(5): 910–923

92.

Olesen

Richardson

(2012) “Strategic planning in transition: contested rationalities and spatial logics in twenty-first century Danish planning experiments”. European Planning Studies 20(10): 1689–1706

93.

Oosterlynck

Van den Broeck

Albrechts

Moulaert

Verhetsel

(2011) Strategic Spatial Projects: Catalysts for Change, Abingdon: Routledge

94.

Pearce

Ayres

(2006) “New patterns of governance in the English region: assessing their implications for spatial planning”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 24(6): 909–927

95.

Pearce

Mawson

Ayres

(2008) “Regional governance in England: a changing role for the government's Regional Offices?”. Public Administration 86(2): 443–463

96.

Raelin

(2006) “Does action learning promote collaborative leadership?”. Academy of Management Learning and Education 5(2): 152–168

97.

Raelin

(2011) “From leadership-as-practice to leaderful practice”. Leadership 7(2): 195–211

98.

Raelin

J A

Raelin

J D

(2006) “Developmental action learning: toward collaborative change”. Action Learning: Research and Practice 3(1): 45–67

99.

Reed

M S

(2008) “Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review”. Biological Conservation 141(10): 2417–2431

100.

Riddell

(2013) “Coalescing views around a strategy”. In: Swain

Marshall

Baden

(eds) English Regional Planning 2000-2010; Lessons for the Future, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 9–30

101.

Roberts

(1996) “Regional Planning Guidance in England and Wales: back to the future?”. The Town Planning Review 67(1): 97–109

102.

Roberts Shaw

P W

Lloyd

M G

(2000) “Regional Development Agencies in England: new strategic regional planning issues?”. Regional Studies 34(1): 75–79

103.

Stephenson

Poxon

(2001) “Regional strategy making and the new structures and processes for regional governance”. Local Government Studies 27(1): 109–124

104.

Susskind

(2006) “Breaking Robert's Rules”. Negotiation Journal 22(3): 351–355

105.

Tewdwr-Jones

Allmendinger

(1998) “Deconstructing communicative rationality: a critique of Habermasian collaborative planning”. Environment and Planning A 30(11): 1975–1989

106.

Tritter

J Q

McCallum

(2006) “The snakes and ladders of user involvement: moving beyond Arnstein”. Health Policy 76(2): 156–168

107.

Voluntary Sector North West (VSNW), 2010, “Regional Strategy”, Voluntary Sector North West, Manchester, http://www.vsnw.org.uk/activities/regionalstrategy

108.

Wannop

U A

(1995) The Regional Imperative: Regional Planning and Governance in Britain, Europe and the United States, London: Regional Studies Association/Jessica Kingsley Publishers

109.

Whitehead

(2003) “‘In the shadow of hierarchy’: meta-governance, policy reform and urban regeneration in the West Midlands”. Area 35(1): 6–14

110.

Yiftachel

Huxley

(2000) “Debating dominance and relevance: notes on the ‘communicative turn’ in planning theory”. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 24(4): 907–913

111.

Ziafati Bafarasat A, 2014, The Application of Strategic Spatial Planning Under Regionalist and Localist Approaches to Public Policy, PhD thesis, School of Environment and Development, University of Manchester

112.

Ziafati Bafarasat

(2015) “Reflections on the three schools of thought on strategic spatial planning”. Journal of Planning Literature 30(2): 132–148

113.

Ziafati Bafarasat

(2016) “Exploring new systems of regionalism: an English case study”. Cities: The International Journal of Urban Policy and Planning 50: 119–128