Spatial gaps in environmental monitoring have important consequences for public policy and regulation of new industrial developments. In the case of Marcellus Shale gas extraction, a water-intensive new form of energy production that is taking place in the state of Pennsylvania (USA), the perception of large gaps in government water monitoring efforts have motivated numerous civil society organizations (CSOs) to initiate their own monitoring programs. Using geospatial mapping, this study reveals that nearly half of the watersheds in the region lack government water monitoring, and CSOs are the sole source of continuous or frequent monitoring data in 22% of the watersheds. While many watersheds remain unmonitored, the gaps do not map on to demographic characteristics typically associated with environmental injustice. This study probes both the reasons for and the implications of the gaps in watershed monitoring, drawing conclusions about the promise and limitations of citizen science.
BambergerMOswaldR E (2013) “Science and politics of shale gas extraction.”. New Solutions : A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy : NS23(1): 7–12
2.
BrownP (2007) Toxic exposures: contested illnesses and the environmental health movement, New York: Columbia University Press
3.
BryantB (1995) “Issues and potential policies and solutions for environmental justice: an overview”. In: BryantB (eds) Environmental Justice: Issues, Policies, and Solutions, Island Press, pp. 8–34
4.
CartwrightE (2013) “Eco-risk and the case of fracking”. In: StraussSRuppSLoveT (eds) Cultures of Energy: Power, Practices, Technologies, Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, pp. 202–213
5.
CorburnJ (2005) Street Science: Community Knowledge and Environmental Health Justice, Cambridge: MIT Press
6.
CouchS RKroll-SmithS (2000) “Environmental movements and expert knowledge: evidence for a new populism”. In: Kroll-SmithSBrownPGunterV J (eds) Illness and the Environment: A Reader in Contested Medicine, New York, NY: New York University Press, pp. 384–408
7.
DeutschWLhotkaLRuiz-CordovaS (2009) “Group dynamics and resource availability of a long-term volunteer water-monitoring program”. Society & Natural Resources22(7): 637–649
8.
EntrekinSEvans-WhiteMJohnsonBHagenbuchE (2011) “Rapid expansion of natural gas development poses a threat to surface waters”. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment9(9): 503–511
9.
FinewoodM HStroupL J (2012) “Fracking and the neoliberalization of the hydro-social cycle in Pennsylvania's Marcellus Shale”. Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education147(1): 72–79
10.
FrickelS (2014) “Not here and everywhere: the non-production of scientific knowledge”. In: KleinmanD LMooreK (eds) Handbook of Science, Technology, and Society, London: Routledge, pp. 263–276
11.
FrickelSCampanellaRVincentM B (2009a) “Mapping knowledge investments in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina: a new approach for assessing regulatory agency responses to environmental disaster”. Environmental Science & Policy12(2): 119–133
12.
FrickelSGibbonSHowardJKempnerJOttingerGHessD J (2009b) “Undone science: charting social movement and civil society challenges to research agenda setting”. Science, Technology & Human Values35(4): 444–473
13.
FrickelSKinchyA (2015) “Lost in space: geographies of ignorance in science and technology studies”. In: GrössMMcGoeyL (eds) Routledge Handbook of Ignorance, New York: Routledge, pp. 174–182
14.
FrickelSVincentM B (2011) “Katrina's contamination: regulatory knowledge gaps in the making and unmaking of environmental contention”. In: DowtyR AAllenB L (eds) Dynamics of Disaster: Lessons on Risk, Response, and Recoverty, London: Earthscan, pp. 11–28
15.
GoldsteinB DKrieskyJPavliakovaB (2012) “Missing from the table: role of the environmental public health community in governmental advisory commissions related to Marcellus Shale drilling”. Environmental Health Perspectives120(4): 483–486
16.
GrossM (2007) “The unknown in process: dynamic connections of ignorance, non-knowledge and related concepts”. Current Sociology55(5): 742–759
17.
HessD J (2009) “The potentials and limitations of civil society research: getting undone science done”. Sociological Inquiry79(3): 306–327
18.
HessD J (2015) “Undone science and social movements: a review and typology”. In: GrossM (eds) the International Handbook of Ignorance, New York: Routledge, pp. 141–154
19.
HudginsA (2013) “Fracking's future in a coal mining past: subjectivity undermined”. Culture, Agriculture, Food and Environment35(1): 54–59
20.
JalbertKKinchyAPerryS (2014) “Civil society research and Marcellus Shale natural gas development: results of a survey of volunteer water monitoring organizations”. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences4(1): 78–86
21.
JalbertKKinchyA (2015) “Sense and influence: environmental monitoring tools and the power of citizen science”. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning. DOI: 10.1080/1523908X.2015.1100985
22.
KinchyA J (2014) “Political scale and conflicts over knowledge production: the case of unconventional natural gas development”. In: KleinmanD LMooreK (eds) Routledge Handbook of Science, Technology, and Society, New York: Routledge, pp. 246–262
23.
KinchyA JJalbertKLyonsJ (2014) “What is volunteer water monitoring good for? Fracking and the plural logics of participatory science”. Political Power and Social Theory27: 259–289
24.
KinchyA JPerryS L (2012) “Can volunteers pick up the slack? efforts to remedy knowledge gaps about the watershed impacts of marcellus shale gas development”. Duke Environmental Law and Policy Journal22(2): 303–339
25.
KiviatE (2013) “Risks to biodiversity from hydraulic fracturing for natural gas in the Marcellus and Utica shales.”. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences1286(1): 1–14
26.
KnopmanD SSmithR A (1993) “20 years of the Clean Water Act”. Environment35(1): 16–20. 34–41
27.
LaveR (2012) “Neoliberalism and the production of environmental knowledge”. Environment and Society: Advances in Research3(1): 19–38
28.
LynchM JStreteskyP B (2013) “The distribution of water-monitoring organizations across states: implications for community environmental policing and social justice”. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management36(1): 6–26
29.
MauleA LMakeyC MBensonE BBurrowsI JScammellM K (2013) “Disclosure of hydraulic fracturing fluid chemical additives: analysis of regulations.”. New Solutions : A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy23(1): 167–187
30.
McMasterR BLeitnerHSheppardE (1997) “GIS-based environmental equity and risk assessment: methodological problems and prospects”. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems24(3): 172–189
31.
MooreK (2006) “Powered by the people: scientific authority in participatory science”. In: FrickelSMooreK (eds) The New Political Sociology of Science, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 299–323
32.
MurphyM (2004) “Uncertain exposures and the privilege of imperception: activist scientists and race at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.”. Osiris19: 266–282
33.
O'RourkeDMaceyG P (2003) “Community environmental policing: assessing new strategies of public participation in environmental regulation”. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management22(3): 383–414
34.
OlmsteadS MMuehlenbachsL aShihJ-SChuZKrupnickA J (2013) “Shale gas development impacts on surface water quality in Pennsylvania.”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences110(13): 4962–4967
OsbornS GVengoshAWarnerN RJacksonR B (2011) “Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America108(20): 8172–8176
37.
OttingerG (2009) “Buckets of resistance: standards and the effectiveness of citizen science”. Science, Technology & Human Values35(2): 244–270
38.
OttingerG (2013) “Changing knowledge, local knowledge, and knowledge gaps: STS insights into procedural justice”. Science, Technology & Human Values38(2): 250–270
39.
OttingerGCohenB R (2011) Technoscience and Environmental Justice: Expert Cultures in a Grassroots Movement, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
40.
OverdevestCMayerB (2008) “Harnessing the power of information through community monitoring: insights from social science”. Texas Law Review86(7): 1493–1526
41.
OwensSPettsJBulkeleyH (2006) “Boundary work: knowledge, policy, and the urban environment”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy24(5): 633–643
42.
PerryS L (2013) “Using ethnography to monitor the community health implications of onshore unconventional oil and gas developments: examples from Pennsylvania's Marcellus Shale.”. New Solutions: A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy23(1): 33–53
43.
PfefferMWagenetL P (2007) “Volunteer environmental monitoring, knowledge creation and citizen–scientist interaction”. SAGE Handbook on Environment and Society, London: SAGE Publications Ltd., pp. 235–249
44.
ProctorRSchiebingerL L (2008) Agnotology: the making and unmaking of ignorance, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
45.
RahmB GRihaS J (2012) “Toward strategic management of shale gas development: regional, collective impacts on water resources”. Environmental Science & Policy17: 12–23
46.
RocchiniDHortalJLengyelSLoboJ MJimenez-Valverdea.RicottaCBacaroGChiarucciA (2011) “Accounting for uncertainty when mapping species distributions: the need for maps of ignorance”. Progress in Physical Geography35(2): 211–226
47.
SchafftK ABorluYGlennaL (2013) “The relationship between Marcellus Shale gas development in Pennsylvania and local perceptions of risk and opportunity”. Rural Sociology78(2): 143–166
48.
Soeder D J, Kappel W M, 2009, “Water resources and natural gas production from the Marcellus Shale” US Geological Survey (May) 1–6, http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2009/3032/
49.
StatesSCyprychGStonerMWydraFCassonLMonnellJ (2011) “Bromide in the Allegheny River and THMS in Pittsburgh drinking water: a link with Marcellus Shale drilling”. American Water Works Association, Water Quality Technology Conference, Phoenix, AZ
50.
StedmanRLeeBBrasierKWeigleJ LHigdonF (2009) “Cleaning up water? Or building rural community? Community watershed organizations in Pennsylvania”. Rural Sociology74(2): 178–200
51.
TuanaN (2006) “The speculum of ignorance: the women's health movement and epistemologies of ignorance”. Hypatia21(3): 1–19
52.
Velinsky D, 2010, “Testimony on the economic and environmental impacts of hydraulic drilling of Marcellus Shale on Philadelphia and the surrounding region” Joint Committees on the Environment and Transportation & Public Utilities of the Council of the City of Philadelphia, 23 September, http://catskillcitizens.org/learnmore/VELINSKYTEST.pdf
53.
WardR C (1996) “Water quality monitoring: Where's the beef?”. Water Resources Bulletin32(4): 673–680
54.
Weltman-FahsMTaylorJ M (2013) “Hydraulic fracturing and brook trout habitat in the Marcellus Shale region: potential impacts and research needs”. Fisheries38(1): 4–15
55.
WilsonJ MVanbriesenJ M (2012) “Oil and gas produced water management and surface drinking water sources in Pennsylvania”. Environmental Practice14(4): 288–300
56.
YearleyS (2006) “Bridging the science-policy divide in urban air-quality management: evaluating ways to make models more robust through public engagement”. Environment and Planning C: Government & Policy24(5): 701–714
