The changing connections between business and political Islam under liberalisation can best be studied through an analysis of moral justifications, political connections in business and institutional modifications. Our evidence on energy utility privatisations through a comprehensive analysis of party connections with firm and industry specific data demonstrates that Turkey's Justice and Development Party (AKP) reshaped industry structures to nurture a new breed of politically linked businesses. In order to build a patronage regime in energy markets, the AKP manipulated regulatory institutions, suppressed the media and advocacy groups, and immobilised the judicial process in response to allegations of misconduct. The highly personalised and opaque allocation of assets increased the power of business groups that enjoyed close ties with the prime minister and key party officials. Leading politically connected firms emerged as not only the major beneficiaries but also key supporters of authoritarian politics. Our findings have important implications for the analysis of political Islam, regulatory institutions and the vulnerabilities of energy privatisations in emerging economies.
Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Kermani A, Kwak J, Mitton T, 2010, “The value of political connections in the United States”, unpublished WP, MIT
2.
AcemogluDRobinsonJ (2006) Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
3.
AdlyA I (2009) “Politically-embedded cronyism: the case of post-liberalization Egypt”. Business and Politics11(4): 1–28
4.
Andres L, Foster V, Guasch, J L, 2006, “The impact of privatisation on the performance of the infrastructure sector: the case of electricity distribution in Latin American countries”, WP 3936, World Bank Policy Research (Washington DC, USA)
ArpacOBirdG (2009) “Turkey and the IMF: a case study in the political economy of policy implementation”. Review International Organisations4: 135–157
7.
AtasoyY (2009) Islam's Marriage with Neoliberalism: State Transformation in Turkey, New York: Palgrave – Macmillan
8.
AtiaM (2012) “A way to paradise: pious neoliberalism, Islam, and faith-based development”. Annals of the Association of American Geographers102(4): 808–827
9.
AtiyasİDutzM (2005) “Competition and regulatory reform in Turkey's electricity industry”. In: HoekmanB MToganS (eds) Turkey: Economic Reforms and Accession to the European Union, Washington, DC: The World Bank and the CEPR, pp. 187–208
10.
BabbS (2013) “The Washington consensus as transnational policy paradigm: its origins, trajectory and likely successor”. Review of International Political Economy20(2): 268–297
11.
BacikG (2008) “The parliamentary election in Turkey, July 2007”. Electoral Studies27: 356–390
12.
BaconRBeson-JonesJ (2001) “Global electric power reform, privatisation and liberalization of the electric power industry in developing countries”. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment26: 331–359
BakırC (2009) “Wobbling but still on its feet: the Turkish economy in the global financial crisis”. South European Society and Politics14(1): 71–85
15.
BakırCÖnişZ (2010) “The regulatory state and Turkish banking reforms in the age of Post-Washington Consensus”. Development and Change41(1): 77–106
16.
BanCBlythM (2013) “The BRICs and the Washington consensus: an introduction”. Review of International Political Economy20(2): 241–255
17.
BanerjeeA V (1992) “A simple model of herd behaviour”. Quarterly Journal of Economics107(3): 797–817
18.
BartuCKolluoğluA B (2008) “Emerging spaces of neoliberalism: a gated town and a public housing project in Istanbul”. New Perspectives on Turkey39: 5–46
Blind P K, 2009, Democratic Institutions of Undemocratic Individuals: Privatisations, Labor, and Democracy in Argentina and Turkey” (Palgrave Macmillan, New York, NY)
24.
BortolottiBFaccioM (2009) “Government control of privatized firms”. The Review of Financial Studies22(8): 2907–2939
CetinTOğuzF (2007) “The politics of regulation in the Turkish electricity market”. Energy Policy35(3): 1761–1770
27.
ChoiJ PThumM (2009) “The economics of politically connected firms”. International Journal of Tax and Public Finance16: 605–620
28.
ClaessensSFeijenELaevenL (2008) “Political connections and preferential access to finance: the role of campaign contributions”. Journal of Financial Economics88: 554–580
29.
ÇokgezenM (2000) “New fragmentations and new cooperations in the Turkish bourgeoisie”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy8: 525–544
ESI (European Stability Initiative) (2005) Islamic Calvinists: Change and Conservatism in Central Anatolia, Berlin: European Stability Initiative
36.
FaccioM (2006) “Politically connected firms”. American Economic Review96: 369–386
37.
FaccioMMasulisMMcconnellJ J (2006) “Political connections and corporate bailouts”. Journal of Finance61(6): 2597–2635
38.
FanJ P HWongT JZhangT (2007) “Politically connected CEOS, corporate governance and Post-IPO performance of China's newly partially privatized firms”. Journal of Financial Economics84(1): 330–357
39.
FormisanoR P (2012) The Tea Party: A Brief History, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press
40.
GrovesCMundayMYakovlevaN (2013) “Fighting the pipe: neoliberal governance and barriers to effective community participation in energy infrastructure planning”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy31(2): 340–356
41.
GülalpH (1999) “Political Islam in Turkey: the rise and fall of the Refah Party”. The Muslim World89(1): 22–41
42.
GumuscuS (2010) “Class, status, and party: the changing face of political Islam in Turkey and Egypt”. Comparative Political Studies43(7): 835–861
43.
GurievSRachinskyA (2005) “The role of oligarchs in Russian capitalism”. Journal of Economic Perspectives19(1): 131–150
HefetzAWarnerM EVigoda-GadotE (2012) “Privatization and intermunicipal contracting: the US local government experience 1992–2007”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy30(4): 675–692
47.
HoşgörE (2011) “Islamic capital/Anatolian tigers: past and present”. Middle Eastern Studies47(2): 343–360
48.
IsmailS (2011) “Authoritarian government, neoliberalism and everyday civilities in Egypt”. Third World Quarterly32(5): 845–862
49.
IsmailS (2013) “Piety, profit and the market in Cairo: a political economy of Islamisation”. Contemporary Islam7(1): 107–128
50.
JohnsonSToddM (2003) “Cronyism and capital controls: Evidence from Malaysia”. Journal of Financial Economics67: 351–382
51.
JunisbaiB (2012) “Improbable but potentially pivotal oppositions: privatisation, capitalists, and political contestation in the Post-Soviet autocracies”. Perspectives on Politics10: 891–916
52.
KaramanO (2013) “Urban neoliberalism with Islamic characteristics”. Urban Studies50: 3412–3427
53.
KhannaTPalepuK (1999) “Policy shocks, market intermediaries, and corporate strategy: the evolution of business groups in Chile and India”. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy8(2): 271–310
54.
KhwajaA IMianA (2005) “Do lenders favor politically connected firms? Rent provision in an emerging financial market”. Quarterly Journal of Economics120: 1371–1411
55.
Kuban D, Sözeri C, 2012, “Caught in the Wheels of Power: The Political, Legal and Economic Constraints on Independent Media and Freedom of the Press in Turkey” (TESEV, Istanbul, Turkey)
56.
KuranT (1997) “Islamism and economics: policy implications for a free society”. International Review of Comparative Public Policy9: 71–102
57.
LarnerW (2000) “Neo-liberalism: policy, ideology, governmentality”. Studies in Political Economy63: 5–25
McGrawB (2010) Faith in Politics: Religion and Liberal Democracy, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
60.
MacleodD (2004) Downsizing the State: Privatisation and the Limits of Neo-liberal Reform in Mexico, University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press
61.
MegginsonWNetterJ (2001) “From state to market: a survey of empirical studies on privatisation”. Journal of Economic Literature39(2): 321–389
62.
MuraA (2014) “The inclusive dynamics of Islamic universalism: from the vantage point of Sayyid Qutb's critical philosophy”. Comparative Philosophy5(1): 29–54
63.
NagayamaN (2007) “Effects of regulatory reforms in the electricity supply industry on electricity prices in developing countries”. Energy Policy35(6): 3440–3462
64.
NamC (1995) “South Korea's big business clientelism in democratic reform”. Asian Survey25(4): 357–366
65.
ÖnişZ (2006) “Varieties and crises of neoliberal globalisation: Argentina, Turkey and the IMF”. Third World Quarterly27(2): 239–263
66.
ÖnişZ (2011) “Power, interests and coalitions: the political economy of mass privatisation in Turkey”. Third World Quarterly32(4): 707–724
67.
ÖzcanG B (2006) “A critical analysis of decentralisation and local economic development”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy24(1): 117–138
68.
ÖzcanG B (2010) Building States and Markets: Enterprise Development in Central Asia, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan
69.
ÖzcanG BÇokgezenM (2003) “Limits to alternative forms of capitalisation: the case of Anatolian Holding companies”. World Development31(12): 2061–2084
70.
ÖzcanG BÇokgezenM (2006) “Trusted markets: the exchanges of Islamic companies”. Comparative Economic Studies48(1): 132–155
71.
ÖzcanG BGündüzU (2015) “Political connectedness and business performance: evidence from Turkish industry rankings”. Business and Politic17(1): 41–73
72.
ÖzkıvrakÖ (2004) “Electricity restructuring in Turkey”. Energy Policy33: 1339–1350
73.
PayneD (2010) “Spiritual security, the Russian Orthodox Church, and the Russian Foreign Ministry: collaboration or cooptation?”. Journal of Church and State52(4): 712–727
74.
PeckJ (2010) Construction of Neoliberal Reason, Oxford: Oxford University Press
75.
PESA-Politik Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Merkezi [Political, Economic and Social Research Centre], (2013), Dindar/Muhafazkâr İşadamları Perspektifinden İslam Ekonomisi ve Katılım Bankacılığı [Islamic Economics and Partnership Banking Through the Perspectives of Religious/Conservative Businessmen], http://pesar.org/sites/default/files/islam_ekonomisi_rapor.pdf
76.
Privatisation Agency of Turkey, 2009, Privatisation Report, Ankara
77.
Privatisation Agency of Turkey, 2010, Privatisation Report, Ankara
78.
PolatN (2013) “Regime change in Turkey”. International Politics50(3): 435–454
RudnyckyjD (2009) “Spiritual economies: Islam and neoliberalism in contemporary Indonesia”. Cultural Anthropology24: 104–141
84.
Salas-PorrasA (2005) “Changing the basis of political support in Mexico: pro-business networks and the market reform agenda”. Review of International Political Economy12(1): 129–154
85.
SapienzaP (2004) “The effects of government ownership on bank lending”. Journal of Financial Economics72(2): 357–384
86.
SirasoontornPQuigginJ (2007) “The political economy of privatisation in the Thai electricity industry”. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy12(3): 403–419
87.
SönmezÜ (2011) “The political economy of market and regulatory reforms in Turkey: the logic and unintended consequences of ad-hoc strategies”. New Political Economy16(1): 101–130
88.
Srivastava M, Harvey B, 2014, “Erdogan eye on ‘Crazy Projects’ links Turkey scandal to builders” Bloomberg Report, 6 January
89.
TankhaS (2009) “Lost in translation: interpreting the failure of electric power privatisation in Brazil”. Journal of Latin American Studies41(1): 59–90
90.
TekeliRKaplanM (2008) “Determinants of the distribution of the central-government budgetary grants in Turkey”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy26(5): 954–967
91.
TepeS (2005) “Turkey's AKP: a model ‘Muslim-Democratic’ party?”. Journal of Democracy16(3): 69–82
92.
TepeSDemirkayaB (2011) “(Not) getting religion: has political science lost sight of Islam?”. Politics and Religion4(2): 203–228
93.
The Chamber of Electrical Engineers, 2009, Privatisation Report, İstanbul
94.
TuğalZ C (2009) Passive Revolution: Absorbing the Islamic Challenge to Capitalism, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
95.
TuğalZ C (2012) “Fight or acquiesce? religion and political process in Turkey's and Egypt's Neoliberalizations”. Development and Change43(1): 23–51
96.
UlusoyAOğuzF (2007) “The privatisation of electricity distribution in Turkey: a legal and economic analysis”. Energy Policy35: 5021–5034
97.
WankD L (2002) “Business-State clientelism in China: decline or evolution”. In: GoldDGuthrieDWank DD (eds) Social Connections in China: Institutions, Culture, and the Changing Nature of Guanxi, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
98.
YavuzM H (2004) Islamic Political Identity in Turkey, Oxford: Oxford University Press
99.
ZhangY FParkerDKirkpatrickC (2008) “Electricity sector reform in developing countries: an econometric assessment of the effects of privatisation, competition and regulation”. Journal of Regulatory Economics33(2): 159–178
