This case study explores electric grid failure in the aftermath of a major storm. The thick description of the event highlights broader issues of climate change, the changing regulatory regime of electricity provision, and urban network vulnerability. The reaction to the storm forced a shift in the regulatory regime from one that stressed cost reductions and return on investment to one that also encompassed issues of grid resiliency and service reliability.
American Society of Civil Engineers (2009) 2009 Report Card of America's Infrastructure, Washington
2.
AndersonD D (1981) Regulatory Politics and Electric Utilities, Boston: Auburn House
3.
BentleyM LMoteT L (1998) “A climatology of derecho-producing mesoscale convective systems in the central and eastern United States, 1986–95”. Bulletin of American Meteorological Society79: 2527–2540
4.
BentleyM LSparksJ A (2003) “A 15 year climatology of derecho-producing mesoscale convective systems in the central and eastern United States”. Climate Research24: 129–139
5.
Benton-ShortL MShortJ R (2013) Cities and Nature, 2nd. London and New York: Routledge
6.
BulkeleyH (2012) Cities and Climate Change, London and New York: Routledge
7.
ConiglioM CStensrudD JRichmondM B (2004) “An observational study of derecho-producing convective systems”. Weather and Forecasting19: 320–337
FurlongK (2011) “Small technologies, big change: rethinking infrastructure through STS and geography”. Progress in Human Geography35: 460–482
10.
GalbraithK (1958) The Affluent Society, Boston: Houghton Mifflin
11.
GandyM (2005) “Cyborg urbanization: complexity and monstrosity in the contemporary city”. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research29: 26–49
12.
GandyM (2008) “Landscapes of disaster: water, modernity and urban fragmentation in Mumbai”. Environment and Planning A40: 108–130
13.
GilbertR JKahnE (2007) International Comparison of Electricity Regulation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
14.
GrahamS (2010) Disrupted Cities: When Infrastructure Fails, London: Routledge
15.
GrahamSThriftN (2007) “Out of order understanding repair and maintenance”. Theory, Culture and Society24: 1–25
16.
HallK (2009) Out of Sight, Out of Mind Revisited: An Updated Study on the Undergrounding of Overhead Power Lines, Washington, DC: Edison Electric Institute
17.
HansenJSatoMRuedyR (2012) “Perception of climate change”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences109: E2415–E2423
18.
HawleyE W (1995) The New Deal and the Problem of Monopoly, New York: Fordham University Press
19.
HigginsF L (2011) Tree Pruning: Letter of Formal Complaint Submitted to Pepco and MPSC. MPSC File dated 22 April 2011
20.
HirschR F (1999) Power Loss: The Origins of Deregulation and Restructuring in the American Electric Utility Company, Cambridge: MIT Press
21.
HirschmanA O (1970) Exit, Voice and Loyalty, Cambridge: Harvard University Press
22.
HölmstromB (1979) “Moral hazard and observability”. The Bell Journal of Economics10: 74–91
23.
IorisA A R (2012) “The neoliberalization of water in Lima, Peru”. Political Geography31: 266–278
24.
JoskowP (2006) Incentive Regulation in Theory and Practice: Electricity Distribution and Transmission Networks, MIT Press: Boston
25.
KaikaMSwyngedouwE (2000) “Fetishizing the modern city: phantasmagoria of urban technological networks”. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research24: 120–138
26.
LaffontJ JTiroleJ (1991) “The politics of government decision-making: a theory of regulatory capture”. The Quarterly Journal of Economics106: 1089–1127
27.
LatourB (1993) We Have Never Been Modern, Cambridge: Harvard University Press
28.
LatourB (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory, New York: Oxford University Press
29.
McFarlaneCRutherfordJ (2008) “Political infrastructures: governing and experiencing the fabric of the city”. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research32: 363–374
30.
MarvinSMeddW (2010) “Clogged cities; sclerotic infrastructure”. In: GrahamS (eds) Disrupted Cities: When Infrastructure Fails, New York and London: Routledge, pp. 85–96
31.
MonstadtJ (2009) “Conceptualizing the political ecology of urban infrastructures: insights from technology and urban studies”. Environment and Planning A41: 85–96. 1924–1942
OlsonM (1965) The Logic of Collective Action, Cambridge: Harvard University Press
41.
ParkH (2012) “Institutional vulnerability and power system disturbances in the United States”. International Review of Public Administration17: 63–92
42.
PileS (2009) “Emotions and affect in recent human geography”. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers35: 5–20
43.
ShortT A (2014) Electric Power Distribution Handbook, Boca Raton: CRC Press
44.
ShulmanB (2005) “Letter to the editor”. The Washington Post. 26 July
45.
SteinbergT (2000) The Unnatural History of Natural Disaster in America, New York: Oxford University Press
46.
StephensJFlahertyM P (2010) “Why Pepco can't keep the lights on”. The Washington Post
47.
SwyngedouwE (2004) Social Power and the Urbanization of Water, Oxford: Oxford University Press
48.
Ter-MartirosyanA (2003) “The effects of incentive regulation on quality of service in electricity markets”. Working Paper, Washington DC: Department of EconomicsGeorge Washington University
49.
Ter-MartirosyanAKwokaJ (2010) “Incentive regulation, service quality, and standards in US electricity distribution”. Journal of Regulatory Economics38: 258–273
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
