Insurance and compensation are cited as critical elements of resilience to natural and non-natural hazards alike. As a strategy of risk management, it emphasises peace of mind, financial recompense and the swift restoration of a ‘business as usual’ status for civil, social and commercial life. Yet despite the contribution of insurance to risk management, the synergies with progressive or adaptive articulations of resilience are not sufficiently explicated. This paper explores the fundamental contradictions of insurance as a form of resilience through a study of flood risk management. It demonstrates how insurance regimes serve to structurally embed risky behaviour and inhibit change after detrimental events. As such, transformative interpretations of resilience conflict with the long-standing principles and operational norms of insurance that privilege normality. The paper concludes that, despite its currency within resilience discourses, insurance is maladaptive and that insurance regimes reinforce exposure and vulnerability through underwriting a return to the ‘status-quo’ rather than enabling adaptive behaviour.
BallTWerrittyAGeddesA (2013) Insurance and sustainability in flood-risk management: The UK in a transitional state. Area45(3): 266–272.
8.
BarnettJO'NeillS (2010) Maladaptation. Global Environmental Change20(2): 211–213.
9.
BeckU (1992) Risk Society, Towards a New Modernity, London: Sage Publications.
10.
BeckU (2009) World at Risk, Cambridge: Polity Press.
11.
BotzenWJVan Den BerghJCJM (2008) Insurance against climate change and flooding in the Netherlands: Present, future, and comparison with other countries. Risk Analysis28(2): 413–426.
12.
BougenPD (2003) Catastrophe risk. Economy and Society32(2): 253–274.
13.
BowkerP (2007) Flood Resistance and Resilience Solutions: An R&D Scoping Study, London: Defra.
14.
BrandFJaxK (2007) Focusing the meaning(s) of resilience: Resilience as a descriptive concept and a boundary object. Ecology and Society12(1): 23.
15.
BristowG (2010) Resilient regions: Re-‘place’ing regional competitiveness. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society3(1): 153–167.
16.
BrownK (2011) Sustainable adaptation: An oxymoron?Climate and Development3(1): 21–31.
17.
BurbyRJ (2006) Hurricane Katrina and the paradoxes of government disaster policy: Bringing about wise governmental decisions for hazardous areas. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science604(1): 171–191.
18.
BurtonI (1997) Vulnerability and adaptive response in the context of climate and climate change. Climatic Change36(1–2): 185–196.
19.
ButlerCPidgeonN (2011) From ‘flood defence’ to ‘flood risk management’: Exploring governance, responsibility, and blame. Environment and Planning C29(3): 533–547.
20.
CastreeN (2008) Neoliberalising nature: The logics of deregulation and reregulation. Environment and Planning A40(1): 131–152.
21.
ChattertonJViavatteneCMorrisJ (2010) Delivering Benefits Through Evidence: The Costs of the 2007 Summer Floods in England, Bristol: Environment Agency.
22.
CoaffeeJ (2013) Rescaling and responsibilising the politics of urban resilience: From national security to local place-making. Politics33(4): 240–252.
23.
CoaffeeJO'HareP (2008) Urban resilience and national security: The role for planners. Proceedings of the Institute of Civil Engineers: Urban Design and Planning161: 171–182.
CollierS (2014) Neoliberalism and natural disaster. Journal of Cultural Economy7(3): 273–290.
26.
Committee on Climate Change (2014) Managing climate risks to well-being and the economy: Adaptation Sub-Committee Progress Report 2014, London: Committee on Climate Change.
27.
ConnellyAGabaldaVGarvinS (2015) Testing innovative technologies to manage flood risk. Proceedings of the ICE – Water Management2(168): 66–73.
28.
CoteMNightingaleA (2012) Resilience thinking meets social theory situating social change in socioecological systems (SES) research. Progress in Human Geography36(4): 475–489.
29.
DavoudiS (2012) Resilience, a bridging concept or a dead end?Planning Theory and Practice13(2): 299–307.
30.
DavoudiSBrooksEMehmoodA (2013) Evolutionary resilience and strategies for climate adaptation. Planning Practice & Research28(3): 307–322.
31.
DeanM (1999) Risk, calculable and incalculable. In: LuptonD (ed.) Risk and Sociocultural Theory: New Directions and Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 131–159.
32.
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) (2005) Making Space for Water: Taking Forward a New Government Strategy for Flood and Coastal Management in England, London: Defra.
33.
Entec UK and Greenstreet Berman (2008) Developing the Evidence Base for Flood Resistance and Resilience: Summary Report, London: Defra.
34.
Environment Agency (2009) Flooding in England: A National Assessment of Flood Risk, Bristol: Environment Agency.
35.
EricsonRDoyleABarryD (2003) Insurance as Governance, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
European Environment Agency (2011) Mapping the Impacts of Natural Hazards and Technological Accidents in Europe, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
38.
EwaldF (1991) Insurance and risk. In: BurchillGGordonCMillarP (eds) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, Hemel Hempstead: Harvester, Wheatsheaf, pp. 197–210.
39.
GiddensA (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, Cambridge: Polity.
40.
GiddensA (1998) The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy, Oxford: Polity Press.
41.
GleesonB (2008) Critical commentary. Waking from the dream: An Australian perspective on urban resilience. Urban Studies45(13): 2653–2668.
42.
GrecoM (1993) Psychosomatic subjects and the ‘duty to be well’: Personal agency within medical rationality. Economy and Society22(3): 357–372.
43.
GundersonLHHollingCS (2002) Panarchy, Washington, DC: Island Press.
44.
GuySMarvinS (1999) Understanding sustainable cities: Competing urban futures. European Urban and Regional Studies6(3): 268–275.
45.
HarrisonDMSmershGTSchwartzAL (2001) Environmental determinants of housing prices: The impact of flood zone status. Journal of Real Estate Research21(1/2): 3–20.
46.
HM Government (2011) Understanding the Risks, Empowering Communities, Building Resilience: The National Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management Strategy for England, Session: 2010–2012, Unnumbered Act paper laid before Parliament 23 May 2011.
47.
HollingCS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics4: 1–23.
IPCC (2012) Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation: Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressAvailable at: https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/special-reports/srex/SREX_Full_Report.pdf (accessed 20 August 2015).
50.
IPCC (2014) Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability, IPCC. Available at: http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg2/ (accessed 20 August 2015).
51.
JohnsonCPenning-RowsellEParkerD (2007) Natural and imposed injustices: The challenges in implementing ‘fair’ flood risk management policy in England. The Geographical Journal173(4): 374–390.
52.
JohnsonCPriestS (2008) Flood risk management in England: A changing landscape of risk responsibility?International Journal of Water Resources Development24(4): 513–525.
53.
Johnson CL, Tunstall SM and Penning-Rowsell EC (2004) Crises as Catalysts for Adaptation: Human Response to Major Floods. ESRC Environment and Human Behaviour Research Report RES-221-25-0037. Flood Hazard Research Centre Publication 511. Enfield: Middlesex University.
54.
JohnsonCLTunstallSMPenning-RowsellEC (2005) Floods as catalysts for policy change: Historical lessons from England and Wales. International Journal of Water Resources Development21(4): 561–575.
55.
JosephJ (2013) Resilience as embedded neoliberalism: A governmentality approach. Resilience1(1): 38–52.
56.
KingdonJ (1995) Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies, New York: Harper Collins.
57.
KleinN (2007) The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism, London: Penguin.
58.
KuhlickeCSteinfuhrerA (2013) Searching for resilience or building social capacities for flood risks?Planning Theory and Practice14(1): 114–120.
59.
LamondJPenning-RowsellE (2014) The robustness of flood insurance regimes given increased risk resulting from climate change. Climate Risk Management2: 1–10.
60.
LamondJEProverbsDGHammondFN (2009) Accessibility of flood risk insurance in the UK: Confusion, competition and complacency. Journal of Risk Research12(6): 825–841.
61.
LeachMScoonesIStirlingA (2010) Governing epidemics in an age of complexity: Narratives, politics and pathways to sustainability. Global Environmental Change20(3): 369–377.
62.
LehtonenTKLiukkoJ (2011) The forms and limits of insurance solidarity. Journal of Business Ethics103(1): 33–44.
63.
LemkeT (2001) The birth of bio-politics: Michel Foucault's lecture at the Collège de France on neo-liberal governmentality. Economy and Society30(2): 190–207.
64.
LuebkenUMauchC (2011) Uncertain environments: Natural hazards, risk, and insurance in historical perspective. Environment and History17(1): 1–12.
65.
LuptonD (1999) Risk, London: Routledge.
66.
LuptonD (2006) Sociology and risk. In: MythenGWalklateS (eds) Beyond the Risk Society: Critical Reflections on Risk and Human Security, Maidenhead: Open University Press, pp. 11–24.
67.
MaguireBCartwrightS (2008) Assessing a Community's Capacity to Manage Change: A Resilience Approach to Social Assessment, Canberra: Australian Government Bureau of Rural Sciences.
68.
ManyenaSBO'BrienGO'KeefeP (2011) Disaster resilience: A bounce back or bounce forward ability?Local Environment16(5): 417–424.
69.
McEvoyDLindleySHandleyJ (2006) Adaptation and mitigation in urban areas: Synergies and conflicts. Proceedings of the ICE-Municipal Engineer159(4): 185–191.
70.
Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management (2006) Spatial Planning Key Decision ‘Room for the River’. Available at: http://www.ruimtevoorderivier.nl (accessed 3rd June, 2014).
71.
MythenG (2004) Ulrich Beck: A Critical Introduction to the Risk Society, London: Pluto Press.
NiemeyerSPettsJHobsonK (2005) Rapid climate change and society: Assessing responses and thresholds. Risk Analysis25(6): 1443–1456.
74.
O'HarePWhiteI (2013) Deconstructing resilience: Lessons from planning practice. Planning Practice and Research28(3): 275–279.
75.
O'MalleyP (1992) Risk, power and crime prevention. Economy and Society21(3): 252–275.
76.
O'MalleyP (2010) Resilient subjects: Uncertainty, warfare and liberalism. Economy and Society39(4): 488–509.
77.
O'NeillJO'NeillM (2012) Social Justice and the Future of Flood Insurance, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
78.
ParkerDJ (1995) Floodplain development policy in England and Wales. Applied Geography15(4): 341–363.
79.
PeltzmanS (1975) The effects of automobile safety regulation. Journal of Political Economy83(4): 677–726.
80.
PendallRFosterKACowellM (2010) Resilience and regions: Building understanding of the metaphor. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society3(1): 71–84.
81.
Penning-RowsellEPardoeJ (2012) Who benefits and who loses from flood risk reduction?Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy30(3): 448–466.
82.
Penning-RowsellEPriestSJohnsonC (2014) The evolution of UK flood insurance: Incremental change over six decades. International Journal of Water Resources Management30(4): 694–713.
83.
PhillipsonJLoweAProctorER (2012) Stakeholder engagement and knowledge exchange in environmental research. Journal of Environmental Management95(1): 56–65.
ShawK (2012) “Reframing” resilience: Challenges for planning theory and practice. Planning Theory & Practice13(2): 308–312.
91.
ShawKMaythorneL (2012) Managing for local resilience: Towards a strategic approach. Public Policy and Administration28(1): 43–65.
92.
ShawKTheobaldK (2011) Resilient local government and climate change interventions in the UK. Local Environment16(1): 1–16.
93.
SirmansGSZietzENMacPhersonD (2005) The composition of hedonic pricing models. Journal of Real Estate Literature13(1): 3–43.
94.
SmithAStirlingA (2008) Social-Ecological Resilience and Socio-Technical Transitions: Critical Issues for Sustainability Governance. STEPS Working Paper 8, Brighton: STEPS Centre.
95.
SmithAStirlingA (2010) The politics of social-ecological resilience and sustainable socio-technical transitions. Ecology and Society15(1): 11. Available at: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss1/art11/ (accessed 10 June 2014).
96.
SoaneESchubertIChallenorP (2010) Flood perception and mitigation: The role of severity, agency, and experience in the purchase of flood protection, and the communication of flood information. Environment and Planning A42(12): 3023–3038.
97.
ThiekenAHPetrowTKreibichH (2006) Insurability and mitigation of flood losses in private households in Germany. Risk Analysis26(2): 383–395.
98.
TrebyEJClarkbMJPriestSJ (2006) Confronting flood risk: Implications for insurance and risk transfer. Journal of Environmental Management81(4): 351–359.
99.
TullochJLuptonD (2003) Risk and Everyday Life, London: Sage.
100.
WalkerJCooperM (2011) Genealogies of resilience: From systems ecology to the political economy of crisis. Security Dialogue42(2): 143–160.
101.
WhiteI (2010) Water and the City: Risk, Resilience and Planning for a Sustainable Future, London: Routledge.
102.
WhiteI (2013) The more we know, the more we don't know: Reflections on a decade of planning, flood risk management and false precision. Planning Theory and Practice14(1): 106–114.
103.
WhiteIConnellyAGarvinS (2014) Towards best practice in property level flood protection. Town and Country Planning Association84(2): 82–87.
104.
WhiteIO'HareP (2014) From rhetoric to reality: Which resilience, why resilience, and whose resilience in spatial planning?Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy32(5): 934–950.
105.
WilbyRLKeenanR (2012) Adapting to flood risk under climate change. Progress in Physical Geography36: 348–378.
