Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Responding to a recent call for more in-depth qualitative studies of electoral management bodies (EMBs), this article examines formally independent EMBs by using the example of the Election Commission of Thailand (ECT) and the role it played in the recent 2019 election. We argue that in non-democratic regimes with high levels of political polarisation and entrenched elites, formal EMB independence may become part of the problem why elections fail. It creates opportunities for long-term EMB capture by actors who wield power outside of formal politics and are unaccountable to public interest. In case of the ECT, this has led to the decreasing electoral standards culminating in the highly contentious 2019 election where the ECT’s administrative efficiency and effectiveness of voting came secondary to pleasing the entrenched old Thai elite. Its conduct has reduced Thailand’s prospects for a peaceful transition to democratic rule as those who oppose the country’s old elite have increasingly limited opportunities to challenge it through formal means.

Keywords

elections electoral management bodies independence non-democratic regimes Thailand

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ANFREL (2019) The 2019 Thai General Election: A Missed Opportunity for Democracy [online]. Bangkok: The Asian Network for Free Elections. Available at: https://anfrel.org/anfrel-2019-thai-general-election-mission-report/ (accessed 12 December 2019).

Anonymous (2018) Anti-royalism in Thailand since 2006: Ideological shifts and resistance. Journal of Contemporary Asia 48(3): 363–394.

Anna Lawattanatrakul (2019) Voter suppression or mismanagement? Thais face obstacles as overseas voting begins. Prachatai English [online], 15 March. Available at: https://prachatai.com/english/node/7974 (accessed 15 October 2019).

Baker

(2016) The 2014 Thai coup and some roots of authoritarianism. Journal of Contemporary Asia 46(3): 388–404.

Bangkok Post (2019) Students launch campaign to impeach EC. Bangkok Post [online], 29 March. Available at: https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/general/1652624/students-launch-campaign-to-impeach-ec (accessed 21 February 2020).

Bangkok Post (2020) EC defends end to party loan probe. Bangkok Post [online], 25 September. Available at: https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/politics/1991151/ec-defends-end-to-party-loan-probe (accessed 8 December 2020).

Birch

(2011) Electoral Malpractice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Birch

van Ham

(2017) Getting away with foul play? The importance of formal and informal oversight institutions for electoral integrity. European Journal of Political Research 56(3): 487–511.

Blaydes

(2011) Elections and Distributive Politics in Mubarak’s Egypt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

10.

Brownlee

(2007) Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

11.

Connors

(2002) Framing the ‘people’s constitution’. In: McCargo

(ed.) Reforming Thai Politics. Copenhagen: NIAS Press, pp.37–55.

12.

Dressel

(2010) Judicialization of politics or politicization of the judiciary? Considerations from recent events in Thailand. The Pacific Review 23(5): 671–691.

13.

Estévez

Magar

Rosas

(2008) Partisanship in non-partisan electoral agencies and democratic compliance: Evidence from Mexico’s Federal Electoral Institute. Electoral Studies 27(2): 257–271.

14.

Fall

Hounpke

Jinadu

Kambale

(2012) Election Management Bodies in West Africa: A Comparative Study of the Contribution of Electoral Commissions to the Strengthening of Democracy. Somerset West, South Africa: African Books Collective.

15.

Gandhi

(2008) Political Institutions under Dictatorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

16.

Geddes

Wright

Frantz

(2018) How Dictatorships Work: Power, Personalization, and Collapse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

17.

Hartlyn

McCoy

Mustillo

(2008) Explaining the quality of elections in contemporary Latin America. Comparative Political Studies 41(1): 73–98.

18.

International IDEA (2020) Model of Electoral Management: Worldwide [online]. International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. Available at: https://www.idea.int/data-tools/world-view/54 (accessed 17 August 2020).

19.

Isra News (2019) Phopochoro rot thuk yup phak! Lekha kokoto yan mai phop tang chat sanap sanun ngoen ngan to jin [Palang Pracharat survives dissolution! The ECT secretary confirms no foreign donors at the Chinese-style banquet]. Isra News [online], 12 March. Available at: https://www.isranews.org/isranews-news/74616-isranews-74616.html (accessed 24 March 2020).

20.

Khemthong Tonsakulrungruang (2015) The mistake of independence [online]. In: Proceedingss of the Law 2.0: New challenges in Asia 12 Asian Law Institute conference, Taiwan, 21–22 May. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/23881022/The_Mistake_of_Independence (accessed 16 April 2020).

21.

Khemthong Tonsakulrungruang (2019) Thailand’s Tainted Election Commission [blog]. Available at: https://www.newmandala.org/thailands-tainted-election-commission/ (accessed 5 January 2020).

22.

Khemthong Tonsakulrungruang (2020) Anakot Mai: ‘Lawfare’ and Future Forward Party’s Legacy [blog]. Available at: https://www.newmandala.org/anakot-mai-lawfare-and-future-forward-partys-legacy/ (accessed 28 February 2020).

23.

Kuhonta

(2008) The paradox of Thailand’s 1997 ‘people’s constitution’: Be careful what you wish for. Asian Survey 48(3): 373–392.

24.

Little

(2012) Elections, fraud, and election monitoring in the shadow of revolution. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 7(3): 249–283.

25.

McCargo

(2005) Network monarchy and legitimacy crises in Thailand. The Pacific Review 18(4): 499–519.

26.

McCargo

(2014) Competing notions of judicialization in Thailand. Contemporary Southeast Asia 36(3): 417–441.

27.

McCargo

(2019) Democratic demolition in Thailand. Journal of Democracy 30(4): 119–133.

28.

McCargo

Alexander

Desatova

(2017) Ordering peace: Thailand’s 2016 constitutional referendum. Contemporary Southeast Asia 39(1): 65–95.

29.

McCargo

Alexander

(2019) Thailand’s 2019 elections: A state of democratic dictatorship? Asia Policy 14(4): 89–106.

30.

McCargo

Desatova

(2016) Thailand: Electoral intimidation. In: Claes

(ed.) Electing Peace: Violence Prevention and Impact at the Polls. Washington, DC: United Institute of Peace Press, pp.63–96.

31.

Magaloni

(2006) Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and Its Demise in Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

32.

Matichon (2018) Kokoto um rath jaek ngoen khonjon pen nayobai haeng rath mai chai thutjarit leuaktang – mai mi amnat pai sop [ECT defends government’s distribution of money to the poor as a state policy not vote buying – has no powers to investigate]. Matichon [online], 13 December. Available at: https://www.matichon.co.th/politics/news_1271014 (accessed 22 March 2020).

33.

Morgenbesser

(2020) The menu of autocratic innovation. Democratization 27(6): 1053–1072.

34.

Norris

(2015) Why Elections Fail. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

35.

Norris

(2017) Transparency in electoral governance. In: Norris

Nai

(eds) Election Watchdogs: Transparency, Accountability and Integrity. New York: Oxford University Press, pp.4–29.

36.

Norris

(2019) Conclusions: The new research agenda on electoral management. International Political Science Review 40(3): 391–403.

37.

Norris

Wynter

Cameron

(2018) Perceptions of Electoral Integrity, (PEI-6.0) [online]. Harvard Dataverse. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/Q6UBTH (accessed 20 November 2020).

38.

Prachachat Net (2019) ‘Reuangkrai’ rong kokoto sop yup phak ‘phopochoro’ phit 3 praden chatjen [Reuangkrai petitions ECT to dissolve the Palang Pracharat Party for clearly breaking three laws]. Prachachat Net [online], 18 February. Available at: https://www.prachachat.net/politics/news-291494 (accessed 23 March 2020).

39.

Prachatai (2019) Kokoto jaeng khwam ao phit ‘phengwin’ minpramath jao tua triam fong klap khoha patibat nathi mi chop [ECT will file a defamation charge against ‘Penguin’ as he prepares to sue back on accusations of dereliction of duty]. Prachatai [online], 7 April. Available at: https://prachatai.com/journal/2019/04/81953 (accessed 24 March 2020).

40.

Prajak Kongkirati (2019) Overview: Political earthquakes. Contemporary Southeast Asia 41(2): 163–169.

41.

Ricks

(2019) Thailand’s 2019 vote: The general’s election. Pacific Affairs 92(3): 443–457.

42.

Sanook (2019) Mati phutruat chi sathana ‘Big Tu’ mai chai jaonathi un khong rath [Ombudsman’s decision points Big Tu’s status is not a governmental official under another category]. Sanook [online], 14 March. Available at: https://www.sanook.com/news/7710770/ (accessed 24 March 2020).

43.

Schedler

(2002) Elections without democracy: The menu of manipulation. Journal of Democracy 13(2): 36–50.

44.

Thai PBS World (2020) General Prawit accepts invitation to head Palang Pracharat party. Thai PBS World [online], 22 June. Available at: https://www.thaipbsworld.com/general-prawit-accepts-invitation-to-head-palang-pracharat-party/ (accessed 20 August 2020).

45.

Thairath (2019) Prathan kokoto ju yut thalaeng bok hai ro phrung ni lan mai mi kreuangkitlek [The ECT chairman stops counting abruptly saying to wait for tomorrow and announces he does not have a calculator]. Thairath [online], 24 March. Available at: https://www.thairath.co.th/news/politic/1528438 (accessed 24 March 2020).

46.

The Nation (2017) Danger in creating ‘biased’ election body: Somchai. The Nation [online], 20 June. Available at: https://www.nationthailand.com/news/30317750 (accessed 5 January 2020).

47.

The Nation (2019) EC ‘brave’ to send Thai Raksa chart to constitutional court, says former commissioner Somchai. The Nation [online], 1 March. Available at: https://www.nationthailand.com/politics/30365050 (accessed 5 January 2020).

48.

van Ham

Garnett

(2019) Building impartial electoral management? Institutional design, independence and electoral integrity. International Political Science Review 40(3): 313–334.

49.

van Ham

Lindberg

(2015) When guardians matter the most: Exploring the conditions under which electoral management body institutional design affects election integrity. Irish Political Studies 30(4): 454–481.

50.

WeWatch (2019) Kanleuaktang 24 mi.ko. 62 ngoppraman kanleuaktang sung thi sut nai prawatisat [The 24 March 2019 election: The highest election budget in history] [online]. Available at: https://wewatchthailand.org/data/2019/02/1558 (accessed 11 March 2020).

51.

Wood

(2019) Hyper-active Governance: How Governments Manage the Politics of Expertise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

52.

Workpoint News (2019) ‘Winyat’ yun kokoto yup phak phalang pracharath – kan ‘pon ek Prayuth’ kaendidet nayok [Winyat petitions ETC to dissolve the Palang Pracharat Party – opposing Prayuth for PM candidate]. Workpoint News [online], 15 February. Available at: https://workpointnews.com/2019/02/15/ยุบพรรคพลังประชารัฐ-ค้า/ (accessed 23 March 2020).

Election commissions and non-democratic outcomes: Thailand’s contentious 2019 election

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References