Context is usually employed to explain voting behaviour, but the way in which it affects people remains obscure. Previous studies have stressed that awareness of the context might indirectly account for political environments’ influence. People aware of their context are expected to be more affected by the relative prevalence of party supporters in their place of residence compared with unaware citizens. By employing stacked logistic regression models (and using Italian National Election Studies data), it is shown that people aware of parties’ settlement in their municipalities are more likely to vote consistently with their surrounding political context.
AgnewJ (1996) Mapping politics: How context counts in electoral geography. Political Geography15(2): 129–146.
2.
BallarinoGSchadeeHMSVezzoniC (2009) Classe sociale e voto in italia. Rivista Italiana Di Scienza Politica39(2): 263–293.
3.
BanduraA (1973) Aggression: A Social Learning Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4.
BarisioneM (2001) Interesse per la politica, appartenenza di coalizione e giudizio sui leader: gli effetti della campagna elettorale. Rivista Italiana Di Scienza Politica31(3): 503–542.
5.
BaybeckBHuckfeldtR (2002) Urban contexts, spatially dispersed networks, and the diffusion of political information. Political Geography21(2): 195–220.
6.
BaybeckBMcClurgSD (2005) What do they know and how do they know it? An examination of citizen awareness of context. American Politics Research33(4): 492–520.
7.
BelloJRolfeM (2014) Is influence mightier than selection? Forging agreement in political discussion networks during a campaign. Social Networks36(1): 134–146.
8.
BerelsonBRLazarsfeldPFMcPheeWN (1954) Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
9.
BooksJWPrysbyCL (1991) Political Behavior and the Local Context. New York: Praeger.
10.
BosLVan der BrugW (2010) Public images of leaders of anti-immigration parties: Perceptions of legitimacy and effectiveness. Party Politics16(6): 777–799.
CorbettaP (2006) Variabili sociali e scelta elettorale. Il tramonto dei ‘cleavages’ tradizionali. Rivista Italiana Di Scienza Politica36(3): 415–430.
13.
De SioLCataldiMDe LuciaF (2013) Le Elezioni Politiche 2013. Roma: Cise.
14.
Delli CarpiniMXKeeterS (1996) What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
15.
DiamantiI (2003) Bianco, Rosso, Verde E. Azzurro. Bologna: Il Mulino.
16.
GalliG (ed.) (1968) Il Comportamento Elettorale in Italia. Bologna: Il Mulino.
17.
HaythornthwaiteC (2005) Social networks and Internet connectivity effects. Information, Community & Society8(2): 125–147.
18.
HightonB (2000) Residential mobility, community mobility, and electoral participation. Political Behavior22(2): 109–120.
19.
HuckfeldtR (1979) Political participation and the neighborhood social context. American Journal of Political Science23(3): 579–592.
20.
HuckfeldtRSpragueJ (1987) Networks in context: The social flow of political information. American Political Science Review81(4): 1197–1216.
21.
HuckfeldtRSpragueJ (1995) Citizens, Politics and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
JohnstonRJPattieCJ (1998) Composition and context: Region and voting in Britain revisited during Labour’s 1990s’ revival. Geoforum29(3): 309–329.
23.
MancosuM (2016) Contexts, networks, and voting behavior: The social flow of political communication in Italy. Italian Political Science Review/rivista Italiana Di Scienza Politica46(3): 335–354.
24.
MancosuMVezzoniC (2017a) Actor-partner interdependence models (APIM) and voting behavior: Methodology and applications. Political Psychology. Epub ahead of print 17January. DOI: 10.1111/pops.12400.
25.
MancosuMVezzoniC (2017b) ‘Blood is thicker than water’: Interpersonal influence, selection, and the role of family in forging Italians’ political agreement. International Journal of Communication11: 647–688.
MutzDCMondakJJ (2006) The workplace as a context for cross-cutting political discourse. Journal of Politics68(1): 140–155.
28.
NirL (2011) Disagreement and opposition in social networks: Does disagreement discourage turnout?Political Studies59(3): 674–692.
29.
OrbellJM (1970) An information-flow theory of community influence. Journal of Politics32(2): 322–338.
30.
PassarelliGTuortoD (2012) The Lega Nord goes south: The electoral advance in Emilia-Romagna: A new territorial model?Political Geography31(7): 419–428.
31.
PattieCJohnstonR (2000) People who talk together vote together: An exploration of contextual effects in Great Britain. Annals of the Association of American Geographers90(26): 41–66.
32.
PattieCJJohnstonRJ (2003) Local battles in a national landslide: Constituency campaigning at the 2001 British General Election. Political Geography22(4): 381–414.
33.
PattieCJJohnstonRJSchipperMPottsL (2015) Are regions important in British elections? Valence politics and local economic contexts at the 2010 general election. Regional Studies49(9): 1561–1574.
34.
PetersenMA (2009) Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Review of Financial Studies22(1): 435–480.
35.
PutnamR (1966) Political attitudes and the local community. American Political Science Review60(3): 640–654.
RolfeM (2012) Voter Turnout: A Social Theory of Political Participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
38.
SchmittHSanzABraunD (2008) The micro-foundations of second-order election theory: Theoretical reconstructions and empirical tests. Paper presented Staff Seminar at CEVIPOFF, Paris, 9–11 December.
39.
Solé-OlléA (2006) The effects of party competition on budget outcomes: Empirical evidence from local governments in Spain. Public Choice126(1–2): 145–176.
40.
Van der BrugW (2004) Issue ownership and party choice. Electoral Studies23(2): 209–233.
41.
Van der BrugWMughanA (2007) Charisma, leader effects and support for right-wing populist parties. Party Politics13(1): 29–51.
42.
Van der BrugWVan der EijkCFranklinM (2007) The Economy and the Vote: Economic Conditions and Elections in Fifteen Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
Van der EijkCFranklinM (1996) Choosing Europe? The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, p.28.
44.
Van der EijkCVan der BrugWKrohMFranklinM (2006) Rethinking the dependent variable in voting behavior: On the measurement and analysis of electoral utilities. Electoral Studies25(3): 424–447.
45.
VezzoniC (2014) Italian National Election Survey 2013: A further step in a consolidating tradition. Rivista Italiana Di Scienza Politica44(1): 81–108.
46.
VezzoniCMancosuM (2016) Diffusion processes and discussion networks: An analysis of the propensity to vote for the 5 star movement in the 2013 Italian election. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties26(1): 1–21.
