Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

People learn about global politics not (solely or even mostly) from conventional teaching in the discipline of International Relations (IR) but from popular culture. We use the television series Game of Thrones to expand upon this premise. We show how representations of the gendered foundations of political authority can be found in popular culture in ways that challenge the division of such knowledge in IR. Game of Thrones and other cultural texts potentially enable different ways of thinking about the world that subvert both the disciplinary mechanisms that divide up knowledge and the related marginalisation of various knowledge claims.

Keywords

global politics IR theory pedagogy popular culture

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baylis

Smith

Owens

(eds) (2014) The Globalization of World Politics, 6th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Becher

Trowler

(2001) Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Culture of Disciplines. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.

Bleiker

(1997) Forget IR theory. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 22(1): 57–85.

Bracewell

(2000) Rape in Kosovo: Masculinity and Serbian nationalism. Nations and Nationalism 6(4): 563–590.

Buzan

Little

(2001) Why international relations has failed as an intellectual project and what to do about it. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 30(1): 19–39.

Carpenter

(2012) Game of Thrones as theory: It’s not as realist as it seems – And that’s good. Foreign Affairs. Available at: http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/137360/charli-carpenter/game-of-thrones-as-theory (accessed 23 August 2013).

Carpenter

(2014) Friday nerd blogging: Call for ISA paper proposals on ‘Game of Thrones’. Blog post on The Duck of Minerva, 9 May. Available at: http://www.whiteoliphaunt.com/duckofminerva/2014/05/friday-nerd-blogging-call-for-isa-paper-proposals-on-game-of-thrones.html (accessed 28 May 2014).

Der Derian

Shapiro

(eds) (1989) International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics. Lanham, MD: Lexington.

Devetak

(2012) An introduction to International Relations: The origins and changing agendas of a discipline. In: Devetak

Burke

George

(eds) An Introduction to International Relations, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.1–20.

10.

Ditum

(2012) Feminist fantasies. Available at: http://sarahditum.com/2012/06/04/feminist-fantasies/ (accessed 23 August 2013).

11.

Drezner

(2011) What can Game of Thrones tell us about our world’s politics? Foreign Policy. Available at: http://drezner.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2011/06/23/what_can_game_of_thrones_tell_us_about_our_worlds_politics (accessed 23 August 2013).

12.

Drezner

(2012) How Game of Thrones found its political groove. Foreign Policy. Available at: http://drezner.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2012/06/05/how_game_of_thrones_found_its_political_groove (accessed 23 August 2013).

13.

Drezner

(2013) Ideas, identity and Game of Thrones. Foreign Policy. Available at: http://drezner.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2013/06/09/ideas_identity_and_game_of_thrones (accessed 23 August 2013).

14.

Dunne

Kurki

Smith

(eds) (2013) International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

15.

Edkins

Zehfuss

(eds) (2014) Global Politics: A New Introduction, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.

16.

Elshtain

(1987) Women and War. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

17.

Enloe

(2000 [1989]) Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics, 2nd edn. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

18.

Foucault

(1977 [1975]) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (trans. Sheridan

). London: Penguin.

19.

Frieden

Lake

Schultz

(2013) World Politics: Interests, Interactions, Institutions. New York: W.W. Norton.

20.

Goldstein

Pevehouse

(2012) International Relations, 10th edn. London: Pearson.

21.

Grayson

Davies

Philpott

(2009) Pop goes IR? Researching the popular culture – World politics continuum. Politics 29(3): 155–163.

22.

Hannah

Wilkinson

(2014) Zombies and IR: A critical reading. Politics. Epub ahead of print 23 October. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9256.12077. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1467-9256/earlyview (accessed 29 October 2014).

23.

Hansen

(2001) Gender, nation, rape: Bosnia and the construction of security. International Feminist Journal of Politics 3(1): 55–75.

24.

Henderson

(2014) Game of Thrones: Too much racism and sexism – So I stopped watching. The Guardian. Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2014/apr/29/game-of-thrones-racism-sexism-rape (accessed 26 August 2014).

25.

Hodge

(2012) Geek Girl Con 2012 on Game of Thrones. Gender Focus. Available at: http://www.gender-focus.com/2012/08/29/geek-girl-con-2012-on-game-of-thrones/ (accessed 23 August 2013).

26.

Holsti

(1985) The Dividing Discipline: Hegemony and Diversity in International Theory. Winchester, MA: Allen & Unwin.

27.

Hooper

(2001) Manly States: Masculinities, International Relations and Gender Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.

28.

Jackson

Sørensen

(2013) Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches, 5th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

29.

Kantola

Dahl

(2005) Gender and the state: From differences between to differences within. International Feminist Journal of Politics 7(1): 49–70.

30.

Kiersey

Neumann

(eds) (2013) Battlestar Galactica and International Relations. London: Routledge.

31.

Kristensen

(2012) Dividing discipline: Structures of communication in international relations. International Studies Review 14(1): 32–50.

32.

Mingst

Arreguín-Toft

(2014) Essentials of International Relations, 6th edn. New York: W.W. Norton.

33.

Nau

(2015) Perspectives on International Relations, 4th edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

34.

Nexon

Neumann

(eds) (2006) Harry Potter and International Relations. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

35.

Peterson

(1992) Security and Sovereign States: What is at stake in taking feminism seriously? In: Peterson

(ed.) Gendered States: Feminist (Re)Visions of International Relations Theory. London and Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, pp.31–64.

36.

Rosenberg

(2011a) Game of Thrones: HBO shows the ugly edge of fantasy. The Atlantic. Available at: http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2011/04/game-of-thrones-hbo-shows-the-ugly-edge-of-fantasy/237033/ (accessed 23 August 2013).

37.

Rosenberg

(2011b) Realpolitik in a fantasy world. Foreign Policy. Available at: http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/07/18/realpolitik_in_a_fantasy_world (accessed 26 August 2014).

38.

Rowley

(2015) Popular culture and the politics of the visual. In: Shepherd

(ed.) Gender Matters in Global Politics: A Feminist Introduction to International Relations, 2nd edn. London: Routledge, pp.361–374.

39.

Rowley

Shepherd

(2012) Contemporary politics: Using the ‘F’ word and teaching gender in international relations. In: Gormley Heenan

Lightfoot

(eds) Teaching Politics and International Relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, pp.146–161.

40.

Rowley

Weldes

(2012) The evolution of international security studies and the everyday: Suggestions from the Buffyverse. Security Dialogue 43(6): 513–530.

41.

Ruane

James

(2012) The International Relations of Middle Earth: Learning from The Lord of the Rings. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.

42.

Russell

(2002) Writing in the Academic Disciplines: A Curricular History. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

43.

Sachleben

(2014) World Politics on Screen: Understanding International Relations through Popular Culture. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.

44.

Saideman

(2013) The Game of Thrones and popular understandings of international relations. e-IR. Available at: http://www.e-ir.info/2013/03/22/the-game-of-thrones-and-popular-understandings-of-international-relations/ (accessed 23 August 13).

45.

Shapiro

(2009) Cinematic Geopolitics. London: Routledge.

46.

Shapiro

(2013) Studies in Transdisciplinary Method: After the Aesthetic Turn. London: Routledge.

47.

Shepherd

(2010) Feminist security studies. In: Denemark

(ed.) International Studies Encyclopedia, [EV-GE]. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp.2181–2201.

48.

Shepherd

(2013) Gender, Violence and Popular Culture: Telling Stories. London: Routledge.

49.

Smith

(2000) The discipline of international relations: Still an American social science? British Journal of Politics and International Relations 2(3): 374–402.

50.

Smith

(2013) Introduction: Diversity and disciplinarity in international relations theory. In: Dunne

Kurki

Smith

(eds) International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.1–13.

51.

Smith

Owens

Baylis

(2014) Introduction. In: Baylis

Smith

Owens

(eds) The Globalization of World Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.1–34.

52.

Steans

(2003) Engaging from the margins: Feminist encounters with the ‘Mainstream’ of international relations. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 5(3): 428–454.

53.

Sylvester

(2007) Anatomy of a footnote. Security Dialogue 38(4): 547–558.

54.

Sylvester

(2010) Tensions in feminist security studies. Security Dialogue 41(6): 607–614.

55.

Sylvester

(2013) Experiencing the end and afterlives of International Relations/theory. European Journal of International Relations 19(3): 609–626.

56.

The Opinioness of the World (2011) Here there be sexism: Game of Thrones Season 1 and Gender. Available at: http://opinionessoftheworld.com/2011/06/20/game-of-thrones-and-gender/ (accessed 23 August 2013).

57.

Tickner

(2010) You may never understand: Prospects for feminist futures in international relations. Australian Feminist Law Journal 32(1): 9–20.

58.

Tickner

(2014) Gender in world politics. In: Baylis

Smith

Owens

(eds) The Globalization of World Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.258–273.

59.

Waever

(2013) Still a discipline after all these debates? In: Dunne

Kurki

Smith

(eds) International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.306–328.

60.

Waltz

(1979) Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

61.

Weber

(1999) IR: The resurrection: Or new frontiers of incorporation. European Journal of International Relations 5(4): 435–450.

62.

Weber

(2002) Flying planes can be dangerous. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 31(1): 129–147.

63.

Weber

(2006) Imagining America at War: Morality, Politics and Film. London: Routledge.

64.

Weber

(2010) International Relations Theory: A Critical Introduction. London: Routledge.

65.

Weldes

(1999) Going cultural: Star Trek, state action and popular culture. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 28(1): 117–134.

66.

Weldes

(ed.) (2003) To Seek Out New Worlds: Exploring Links between Science Fiction and World Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

67.

Zalewski

(2007) Do we understand each other yet? Troubled feminist encounters with(in) international relations. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 9(2): 302–312.

Lessons from Westeros: Gender and power in Game of Thrones

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References