This article examines the institutional, technical, and ontological consequences of plagiarism detection platforms on contemporary academic writing. It argues that services like Turnitin and Grammarly do not simply detect plagiarism but actively reconfigure what counts as authorship, originality, and intellectual integrity. Drawing on historical and media-theoretical perspectives, the article traces plagiarism’s emergence as a culturally contingent offense, showing how its definition has shifted from oral cultures all the way to algorithmically processed patterns. In this transformation, plagiarism detection becomes less a neutral evaluative tool than a form of infrastructural governance that translates interpretive judgment into machinic legibility. Drawing on theorists such as Foucault, Chun, Kittler, Flusser, and Byung-Chul Han, the article situates plagiarism detection within a broader shift from expressive authorship to operational formatting. The article argues that plagiarism detection tools function as psychopolitical instruments, reshaping academic labor through anticipatory compliance and rendering originality as machinic compatibility.
BerardiFranco (2012) The Uprising: On Poetry and Finance. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).
2.
BerardiFranco (2015) And: Phenomenology of the End. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).
3.
BlumSusan D. (2009) My Word!: Plagiarism and College Culture. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
4.
BonatePeter L. (2024) Thoughts on plagiarism and the case against Claudine Gay. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics51: 1–4.
5.
ChunWendy Hui Kyong (2008) Programmability. In: FullerMatthew (ed.) Software Studies: A Lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 224–229.
6.
ChunWendy Hui Kyong (2011) Programmed Visions: Software and Memory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7.
ConleyThomas M. (1990) Rhetoric in the European Tradition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
8.
de CerteauMichel (1984) The Practice of Everyday Life, trans. Steven F. Rendall. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
9.
EdwardsPaul N. (2002) Infrastructure and modernity: Force, time, and social organization in the history of technical systems. In: MisaThomas J.BreyPhilipFeenbergAndrew (eds) Modernity and Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 185–225.
EisensteinElizabeth L. (2005) The Printing Revolution in Early Modern Europe, 2nd edn.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
FlusserVilém (2000) Towards a Philosophy of Photography, trans. MathewsAnthony. London: Reaktion Books.
13.
FlusserVilém (2011) Does Writing Have a Future?, trans. Nancy Ann Roth. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
14.
FoucaultMichel (1971) Orders of discourse, trans. Rupert Swyer. Social Science Information10(2): 7–30.
15.
FoucaultMichel (1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge: And the Discourse on Language, trans. Sheridan SmithA. M.New York, NY: Vintage Books.
16.
FoucaultMichel (1991) Governmentality. In: BurchellGrahamGordonColinMillerPeter (eds) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 87–104.
17.
FoucaultMichel (1998) What is an author? In: FaubionJames D. (ed.) Aesthetics, Method, and Epistemology: Essential Works of Foucault, 1954–1984, Vol. 2. New York, NY: The New Press, pp. 205–222.
18.
GallowayAlexander R. (2004) Protocol: How Control Exists After Decentralization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19.
GaneNicolas (2005) Radical post-humanism: Friedrich kittler and the primacy of technology. Theory, Culture & Society22(3): 25–41.
20.
GitelmanLisa (1999) Scripts, Grooves, and Writing Machines: Representing Technology in the Edison Era. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
GulliferJudy M.TysonGraham A. (2014) Who has read the policy on plagiarism? Unpacking students’ understanding of plagiarism. Studies in Higher Education39(7): 1202–1218.
23.
HanByung-Chul (2015) The Burnout Society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
24.
HanByung-Chul (2017) Psychopolitics: Neoliberalism and New Technologies of Power. London: Verso.
25.
HanByung-Chul (2021) Capitalism and the Death Drive. Cambridge: Polity Press.
HavelockEric A. (1963) Preface to Plato. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
28.
HowardRebecca Moore (1995) Plagiarisms, authorship, and the academic death penalty. College English57(7): 788–806.
29.
JasziPeter (1991) Toward a theory of copyright: The metamorphoses of ‘authorship’. Duke Law Journal1991(2): 455–502.
30.
JulliardKathryn (1994) Perceptions of plagiarism in the use of other authors’ language. Family Medicine26(6): 356–360.
31.
KittlerFriedrich A. (1997) There is no software. In: JohnstonJohn (ed.) Literature, Media, Information Systems. Amsterdam: G+B Arts, pp. 147–155.
32.
KittlerFriedrich A. (1999) Gramophone, Film, Typewriter. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
33.
LacanJacques (1988) The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book II: The Ego in Freud’s Theory and the Technique of Psychoanalysis 1954–1955, trans. TomaselliSylvana. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
OngWalter J. (1958) Ramus, Method, and the Decay of Dialogue: From the Art of Discourse to the Art of Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38.
OngWalter J. (1982) Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. New York, NY: Routledge.
39.
OruçPelin (2022) Documenting Indigenous oral traditions: Copyright for control. International Journal of Cultural Property29: 243–264.
40.
OstrowSaul (1997) Friedrich Kittler: The passage from network to narrative. In: KittlerFriedrich (ed.) Literature, Media, Information Systems. Amsterdam: G+B Arts, pp. ix–xii.
PetersJohn Durham (2015) The Marvelous Clouds: Toward a Philosophy of Elemental Media. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
43.
PflugfelderEhren HelmutReevesJoshua (2024) Surveillance work in (and) teaching technical writing with AI. Technical Communication Quarterly33(2): 99–112.
44.
R3ciprocity.Com-Prof David Maslach (2020) How to deal with idea theft: Academics, PhDs, and scientists that steal intellectual ideas. YouTube, 8January. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qRNhUyBmko8 (accessed 5 June 2025).
45.
RamusPeter (2000) From logic. In: RebhornWayne A. (ed.) Renaissance Debates on Rhetoric. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 153–160.
46.
RoigMiguel (2001) Plagiarism and paraphrasing criteria of college and university professors. Ethics & Behavior11(3): 307–323.
47.
RoseMark (1993) Authors and Owners: The Invention of Copyright. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
WeaverHannah (2024) Experimental Histories: Interpolation and the Medieval British Past. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
53.
WikoffKelly H. (1992) The problematics of plagiarism. PhD Thesis, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, USA. Available at: https://www.proquest.com/docview/304021860 (accessed 21 May 2025).
