Reviving the somewhat forgotten notion of ‘secondary orality’, this paper conceptualizes online conspiracism as a creative, if monstrous, response to the attention economy of social media. Combining classic literature on oral cultures and current research on online subcultures, this paper takes conspiratorial folklore seriously and develops a program of research into its features and into its surprising adaptation to the attention regime of digital media.
AdamicLada A.GlanceNatalie (2005) The political blogosphere and the 2004 US election: Divided they blog. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Link Discovery. New York: ACM, pp. 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1145/1134271.1134277.
2.
AlmalikiMalik (2019) Online misinformation spread: A systematic literature map. In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. New York: ACM, pp. 171–78. https://doi.org/10.1145/3325917.3325938.
AssmanAleida (2006) The printing press and the internet: From a culture of memory to a culture of attention. In: GentzNatashaKramerStefan (eds) Globalization, Cultural Identities and Media Representations. Albany, NY: SUNY, pp. 11–22.
BarabásiAlbert-László (2002) Linked: The New Science of Networks. How Everything Is Connected to Everything Else and What It Means for Business, Science, and Everyday Life. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books. http://books.google.com/books?id=rydKGwfs3UAC&pgis=1.
7.
BarberáPabloJostJohn T.NaglerJonathanTuckerJoshua A.BonneauRichard (2015) Tweeting from left to right: Is online political communication more than an echo chamber?Psychological Science26(10): 1531–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615594620.
8.
BashamLee (2006) Living with Conspiracy. London: Routledge.
9.
BergerJonahMilkmanKatherine L. (2012) What makes online content viral?Journal of Marketing Research49(2): 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.10.0353.
10.
Berners-LeeTim (2010) Long live the web. Scientific American303(6): 80–85.
11.
Berners-LeeTimCailliauRobertGroffJean FrançoisPollermannBernd (1992) World-Wide Web: The information universe. Internet Research2(1): 52–58. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb047254.
12.
BernsteinMichael S.Monroy-HernándezAndrésHarryDrewAndréPaulPanovichKatrinaVargasGregory G. (2011) 4chan and/b: An analysis of anonymity and ephemerality in a large online community. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. ICWSM5(1): 50–57.
BishopJonathan (2014) Representations of ‘trolls’ in mass media communication: A review of media-texts and moral panics relating to ‘internet trolling’. International Journal of Web Based Communities10(1): 7. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJWBC.2014.058384.
17.
BoydstunAmber E.HardyAnneWalgraveStefaan (2014) Two faces of media attention: Media storm versus non-storm coverage. Political Communication31(4): 509–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2013.875967.
18.
BucherTaina (2012) A technicity of attention: How software makes sense. Cultural Machine13: 1–23.
19.
BucherTainaHelmondAnne (2017) The affordances of social media platforms. In: BurgessJeanPoellThomasMarwickAlice (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Social Media. London: Sage.
20.
BushVannevar (1945) As we may think. The Atlantic Monthly176(1): 101–8.
21.
ButlerJudith (1997) Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. London: Routledge.
22.
ÇalişkanKorayCallonMichel (2009) Economization, Part 1: Shifting attention from the economy towards processes of economization. Economy and Society38(3): 369–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140903020580.
23.
CampbellColin (1972) The cult, the cultic milieu and secularization. In: HillM. (ed.) A Sociological Yearbook of Religion in Britain, No. 5. SCM-Canterbury Press Ltd., pp. 119–36.
CarlsonMatt (2015) When news sites go native: Redefining the advertising-editorial divide in response to native advertising. Journalism16(7): 849–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884914545441.
26.
CarmiElinor (2020) Media Distortions. New York: Peter Lang. DOI: 10.3726/b15334.
27.
CastaldoMariaVenturiniTommasoFrascaPaoloGargiuloFloriana (2021) Junk news bubbles modelling the rise and fall of attention in online arenas. New Media & Society, (forthcoming), 146144482097864. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820978640.
28.
CovingtonPaulAdamsJaySarginEmre (2016) Deep neural networks for YouTube recommendations. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems – RecSys ’16, pp. 191–98. https://doi.org/10.1145/2959100.2959190.
29.
CraneRileySornetteDidier (2008) Robust dynamic classes revealed by measuring the response function of a social system. PNAS105(41): 15649–53. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0803685105.
30.
CroganPatrickKinsleySamuel (2012) Paying attention: Toward a critique of the attention economy. Culture Machine13: 1–29.
31.
DafaureMaxime (2020) The ‘Great Meme War’: The alt-right and its multifarious enemies. Angles10: 0–28. https://doi.org/10.4000/angles.369.
DouglasKaren M.SuttonRobbie M.CichockaAleksandra (2017) The psychology of conspiracy theories. Current Directions in Psychological Science26(6): 538–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417718261.
GillespieTarleton (2016) #trendingistrending when algorithms become culture. In: SeyfertRobertRobergeJonathan (eds) Algorithmic Cultures: Essays on Meaning, Performance and New Technologies. London: Routledge, pp. 52–75.
40.
GlickPeter (2005) Choice of scapegoats. In: DovidioJohn F.GlickPeterRudmanLaurie A. (eds) On the Nature of Prejudice: Fifty Years after Allport. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 244–61.
41.
GoodyJack (2010) Myth, Ritual and the Oral. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
GuadagnoRosanna E.RempalaDaniel M.MurphyShannonOkdieBradley M. (2013) What makes a video go viral? An analysis of emotional contagion and internet memes. Computers in Human Behavior29(6): 2312–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.04.016.
HilgartnerStephenBoskCharles L. (1988) The rise and fall of social problems: A public arenas model. American Journal of Sociology94(1): 53–78. https://doi.org/10.1215/00166928-43-1-2-61.
48.
HindmanMatthew (2009) The Myth of Digital Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
49.
HineGabriel EmileOnaolapoJeremiahCristofaroEmiliano deKourtellisNicolasLeontiadisIliasSamarasRiginosStringhiniGianlucaBlackburnJeremy (2017) Kek, cucks, and God Emperor Trump: A measurement study of 4chan’s politically incorrect forum and its effects on the web. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Web and Social Media, ICWSM 2017, pp. 92–101. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.841769.
50.
HorneBenjamin D.AdaliSibel (2017) This just in: Fake news packs a lot in title, uses simpler, repetitive content in text body, more similar to satire than real news. The 2nd International Workshop on News and Public Opinion at ICWSM. http://arxiv.org/abs/1703.09398.
51.
HowardRobert Glenn (2008) The vernacular web of participatory media. Critical Studies in Media Communication25(5): 490–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295030802468065.
52.
KhamisSusieAngLawrenceWellingRaymond (2017) Self-branding, ‘micro-celebrity’ and the rise of social media influencers. Celebrity Studies8(2): 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/19392397.2016.1218292.
53.
KnightPeter (2000) Conspiracy Culture: From the Kennedy Assassination to The X-Files. London: Routledge.
54.
LanhamRichard A. (2006) The Economics of Attention: Style and Substance in the Age of Information. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
LazerDavidPentlandAlexAdamicLadaAralSinanBarabasiAlbert-LaszloBrewerDevonChristakisNicholas, et al. (2009) Computational social science. Science323(5915): 721–23. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1167742.
LeskovecJureBackstromLarsKleinbergJon (2009) Meme-tracking and the dynamics of the news cycle. Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Paris: ACM, pp. 497–506. https://doi.org/10.1145/1557019.1557077.
McCombsMaxwell E.ShawDonald L. (1972) The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly36(2): 176. https://doi.org/10.1086/267990.
69.
McLuhanMarshall (1964) Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: McGraw-Hill.
70.
MehtaAranyakSaberiAminVaziraniUmeshVaziraniVijay (2007) AdWords and generalized on-line matching. 46th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS’05) V (August): 26
4–73. https://doi.org/10.1109/SFCS.2005.12.
71.
MerrinWilliam (2019) President troll: Trump, 4Chan and memetic warfare. In: Happer, Catherine, Hoskins, Andrew, and Merrin, William (eds) Trump’s Media War. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 201–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94069-4_13.
NewcombHoraceHirschPaul M. (1983) Television as a cultural forum. Quarterly Review of Film & Video8(3): 45–55.
77.
O’ReillyTim (2007) What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. International Journal of Digital Economics65 (March): 17–37.
78.
OngWalter S.J. (1982) Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. London: Methuen.
79.
PapasavvaAntonisZannettouSavvasCristofaroEmiliano deStringhiniGianlucaBlackburnJeremy (2020) Raiders of the Lost Kek: 3.5 years of augmented 4chan posts from the Politically Incorrect Board. 14th International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM 2020). http://arxiv.org/abs/2001.07487.
80.
PariserEli (2011) The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. New York: Penguin Press.
PhillipsWhitney (2015) This Is Why We Can’t Have Nice Things: Mapping the Relationship between Online Trolling and Mainstream Culture. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
PlantinJean-ChristopheLagozeCarlEdwardsPaul N.SandvigChristian (2018) Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook. New Media & Society20(1): 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816661553.
RiederBernhard (2020) Engines of Order: A Mechanology of Algorithmic Techniques. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
89.
RogersRichard (2013) Digital Methods. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
90.
RogersRichard (2018) Otherwise engaged: Social media from vanity metrics to critical analytics. International Journal of Communication12 (732942): 450–72.
91.
RogersRichard (2019) Doing Digital Methods. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
92.
SchachafPninaHaraNoriko (2010) Beyond vandalism: Trolls in Wikipedia. Journal of Information Science36(3): 357–70.
ShifmanLimor (2013) Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
95.
ShuKaiSlivaAmyWangSuhangTangJiliangLiuHuan (2017) Fake news detection on social media: A data mining perspective. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter19(1): 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3137597.3137600.
96.
SimonHerbert A. (1971) Designing organizations for an information rich world. In: GreenbergerM. (ed.) Computers, Communications, and the Public Interest. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 37–72.
97.
SinghVivekDasguptaRupanjalSonagraDarshanRamanKarthikGhoshIsha (2017) Automated fake news detection using linguistic analysis and machine learning. International Conference on Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling, & Prediction and Behavior Representation in Modeling and Simulation (SBP-BRiMS). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.16825.67687.
TerranovaTiziana (2012) Attention, economy and the brain. Culture Machine13: 1–19.
102.
TutersMarc (2019) LARPing & liberal tears: Irony, belief and idiocy in the deep vernacular web. In: FielitzMaikThurstonNick (eds) Post-Digital Cultures of the Far Right. Bielefeld Verlag, pp. 37–48. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839446706-003.
Van EsKarin (2020) YouTube’s operational logic: ‘The view’ as pervasive category. Television and New Media21(3): 223–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476418818986.
105.
VenturiniTommaso (2012) Great expectations: méthodes quali-quantitative et analyse des réseaux sociaux. In: FourmentrauxJean-Paul, (ed.), L’Ère post-media. Humanités digitales et cultures numeriques. Paris: Hermann, Vol. 104, pp. 39–51. https://doi.org/10.4000/lectures.9619
106.
VenturiniTommaso (2019) From fake to junk news, the data politics of online virality. In: BigoDidierIsinEnginRuppertEvelyn (eds) Data Politics: Worlds, Subjects, Rights. London: Routledge, pp. 123–144.
107.
VenturiniTommasoLatourBruno (2010) The social fabric: Digital traces and quali-quantitative methods. In: Proceedings of Future En Seine 2009. Paris: Editions Future en Seine, pp. 87–101.
108.
VenturiniTommasoJacomyMathieuMeunierAxelLatourBruno (2017) An unexpected journey: A few lessons from sciences Po médialab’s experience. Big Data & Society4(2), 205395171772094. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717720949.
109.
VenturiniTommasoJensenPabloLatourBruno (2015) Fill in the gap: A new alliance for social and natural sciences. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation18(2): 11. https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.2729
110.
VosoughiSoroushRoyDebAralSinan (2018) The spread of true and false news online. Venturini, Tommaso (2019)Science359(6380): 1146–51. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559.
111.
WebsterJames (2014) The Marketplace of Attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
112.
WhiteMimi (2003) Flows and other close encounters with television. In: ParksLisaKumarShanti (eds) Planet TV: A Global Television Reader. New York: New York University Press, pp. 94–110.
113.
WilliamsRaymond (1974) Television. Technology and Cultural Form. London: Routledge.
