Against Meritocracy is a meticulous and much needed critique of meritocracy tracing the genealogies of the concept before presenting case studies that demonstrate its continuing ideological power. This review looks at Littler’s analysis within the context of wider understandings of meritocracy and social mobility. It concludes that Littler’s compelling argument of the damage, both ideological and material, caused by the workings of meritocracy needs to be heeded.
BamfieldLHortonT (2009) Understanding Attitudes to Tackling Economic Inequality: An Exploration of the Underlying ‘Drivers’ of Public Attitudes towards Economic Inequality and Welfare Policy, London: The Fabian Society.
2.
Goldthorpe JH and Jackson M (2006) Education based meritocracy: The barriers to its realization. Paper presented at the EQUALSOC conference, 2–3 December 2005, Mannheim.
3.
LareauA (2005) Unequal Childhoods, Los Angeles: University of California Press.
4.
LawlerS (2017) Social mobility talk: Class-making in neo-liberal times. In: LawlerSPayneG (eds) Social Mobility for the 21st Century: Everyone a Winner?, London: Routledge.
5.
Pells R (2016) Private school students have a better chance of being Olympic champions, claims Sir Steve Redgrave. The Independent, 3 August.
6.
ReayD (2017) Miseducation: Inequality, Education and the Working Classes, Bristol: Policy Press.
7.
SchoonIJonesEChengHMaughanB (2012) Family hardship, family instability and children’s cognitive development. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health66: 716–722.
8.
YoungM (1958) The Rise of the Meritocracy, London: Thames & Hudson.
