Bioacoustics is an interdisciplinary field bridging biological and acoustic sciences, which uses sound technologies to record, preserve, and analyse large datasets of animal communications. But it is also a world, made of the meanings created through inter- and intra-species communication. This article empirically explores a variety of bioacoustics research, including interviews with researchers, as part of a broader qualitative study, in order to theorize the expanding sense and sensation of a global biosphere and sonic data. By giving a sustained and detailed account of the science of bioacoustics, particularly how its modes of measurement allow for a new way of understanding what is involved in the de-centred modes of hearing that re-centre acts of listening and, by extension, the nature of the relation between researcher and researched, the article contributes to methodological discussions regarding the longstanding questions of how researchers and scientists are implicated in the knowledge and objects they collectively produce.
AdamsMCoxTMooreGCroxfordBRefaeeMSharplesS (2006) Sustainable soundscapes: Noise policy and the urban experience. Urban Studies43(13): 2385–2398.
2.
AllenM (2010) VoxNet: Reducing latency in high data rate applications. In: GauraEGirodLBruseyJAllenMChallenG (eds) Wireless Sensor Networks: Deployments and Design Frameworks, London: Springer, pp. 115–158.
3.
AltringhamJD (1996) Bats: Biology and Behaviour, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
AsdalK (2008) Subjected to Parliament: The laboratory of experimental medicine and the animal body. Social Studies of Science38(6): 899–917.
5.
AugustTHarveyMLightfootPKilbeyDPapadopoulosTJepsonP (2015) Emerging technologies for biological recording. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society115(3): 731–749.
6.
BaptistaLFGauntSL (1997) Bioacoustics as a tool in conservation studies. In: ClemmonsJRBuchholzR (eds) Behavioral Approaches to Conservation in the Wild, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 212–242.
7.
BarlowKEBriggsPAHaysomKAHutsonAMLechiaraNLRaceyPAWalshALLangtonSD (2015) Citizen science reveals trends in bat populations: The national bat monitoring programme in Great Britain. Biological Conservation182: 14–26.
8.
BarrowsEM (2011) Animal Behavior Desk Reference: A Dictionary of Animal Behavior, Ecology, and Evolution, 3rd edn. London: CRC Press.
9.
BayneEMHabibLBoutinS (2008) Impacts of chronic anthropogenic noise from energy sector activity on abundance of songbirds in the boreal forest. Conservation Biology22(5): 1186–1193.
10.
BenschopR (2007) Memory machines or musical instruments? Soundscapes, recording technologies and reference. International Journal of Cultural Studies10(4): 485–502.
11.
BerlantL (2011) Cruel Optimism, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
12.
BernsteinMH (1998) On Moral Considerability: An Essay on Who Morally Matters, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
BerryNO'ConnorWHolderiedMWJonesG (2004) Detection and avoidance of harp traps by echolocating bats. Acta Chiroptologica6(2): 335–346.
14.
BlesserBSalterLR (2007) Spaces Speak: Are You Listening?, London: MIT Press.
15.
BlumsteinDTMennillDJCleminsPGirodLYaoKet al.(2011) Acoustic monitoring in terrestrial environments using microphone arrays: Applications, technological considerations and prospectus. Journal of Applied Ecology48(3): 758–767.
16.
BolhuisJJWynneCDL (2009) Can evolution explain how minds work?.. Nature458: 832–833.
17.
BorkerALHalbertPMcKownMWTershyBRCrollDA (2015) A comparison of automated and traditional monitoring techniques for marbled murrelets using passive acoustic sensors. Wildlife Society Bulletin39(4): 813–818.
18.
BruyninckxJ (2012) Sound sterile: Making scientific field recordings in ornithology. In: PinchTBijsterveldK (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Sound Studies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 127–150.
19.
BruyninckxJ (2015) Trading twitter: Amateur recorders and economies of scientific exchange at the Cornell Library of Natural Sounds. Social Studies of Science45(3): 344–370.
20.
BullerH (2013) Individuation, the mass and farm animals. Theory, Culture & Society30(7–8): 155–175.
ChandolaT (2012) Listening in to water routes: Soundscapes as cultural systems. International Journal of Cultural Studies16(1): 55–69.
23.
ChandrasekeraTYoonS-YD'SouzaN (2015) Virtual environments with soundscapes: A study on immersion and effects of spatial abilities. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design42: 1003–1019.
24.
ChiewF (2014) Posthuman ethics with Cary Wolfe and Karen Barad: Animal compassion as trans-species entanglement. Theory, Culture & Society31(4): 51–69.
25.
Cottman-Fields M, Brereton M and Roe P (2013) Virtual birding: Extending an environmental pastime into the virtual world for citizen science. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM, pp. 2029–2032.
26.
CristE (1996) Naturalists' portrayals of animal life: Engaging the verstehen approach. Social Studies of Science26(4): 799–838.
27.
CristE (2004) Can an insect speak? The case of the honeybee dance language. Social Studies of Science34(1): 7–43.
28.
DarwinC (1886) The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals, New York: D. Appleton and Company.
29.
De CoenselBBotteldoorenD (2007) The rhythm of the urban soundscape. Noise and Vibration Worldwide38(9): 11–17.
30.
DespretV (2013) Responding bodies and partial affinities in human–animal worlds. Theory, Culture & Society30(7/8): 66–91.
FarinaALattanziEMalavasiRPierettiNPiccioliL (2011a) Avian soundscapes and cognitive landscapes: Theory, application and ecological perspectives. Landscape Ecology26(9): 1257–1267.
33.
FarinaAPierettiNPiccioliL (2011b) The soundscape methodology for long-term bird monitoring: A Mediterranean Europe case-study. Ecological Informatics6(6): 354–363.
34.
FongJ (2016) Making operative concepts from Murray Schafer's soundscapes typology: A qualitative and comparative analysis of noise pollution in Bangkok, Thailand, and Los Angeles, California. Urban Studies53(1): 173–192.
35.
FrieseCClarkeAE (2012) Transposing bodies of knowledge and technique: Animal models at work in reproductive sciences. Social Studies of Science42(1): 31–52.
36.
GaglianoMMancusoSRobertD (2012) Towards understanding plant bioacoustics. Trends in Plant Science17(6): 323–325.
37.
GallagherM (2015) Field recording and the sounding of spaces. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space33(3): 560–76.
38.
GiraudEHollinG (2016) Care, laboratory beagles and affective utopia. Theory, Culture & Society33(4): 27–49.
39.
GogalaM (2014) Sound or vibration, an old question of insect communication. In: CocroftRBGogalaMHillPSMWesselA (eds) Studying Vibrational Communication, Berlin: Springer, pp. 31–46.
40.
GrimshawMGarnerT (2015) Sonic Virtuality: Sound as Emergent Perception, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41.
HaggardP (2008) Human volition: Towards a neuroscience of will. Nature Reviews Neuroscience9: 934–946.
42.
HarawayD (2008) When Species Meet, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
43.
HenriquesJ (2011) Sonic Bodies: Reggae Sound Systems, Performance Techniques, and Ways of Knowing, London: Bloomsbury.
44.
HerbstCTStoegerASFreyRLohschellerJTitzeIRGumpenbergerMFitchWT (2012) How low can you go? Physical production mechanism of elephant infrasonic vocalizations. Science337(6094): 595–599.
45.
HinchliffeSKearnesMBDeganMWhatmoreS (2005) Urban wild things: A cosmopolitical experiment. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space23(5): 643–658.
46.
HoppSLOwrenMJEvansCS (2012) Animal Acoustic Communication: Sound Analysis and Research Methods, London: Springer.
47.
KattiMWarrenPS (2004) Tits, noise and urban bioacoustics. Trends in and Evolution19(3): 109–10.
48.
KindaGBSimardYGervaiseCMarsJIFortierL (2015) Arctic underwater noise transients from sea ice deformation: Characteristics, annual time series, and forcing in Beaufort Sea. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America138(4): 2034–2045.
49.
KronenbergJ (2014) Environmental impacts of the use of ecosystem services: Case study of birdwatching. Environmental Management54(3): 617–630.
50.
LaioloP (2010) The emerging significance of bioacoustics in animal species conservation. Biological Conservation143(7): 1635–1645.
51.
Lameira AR, Hardus ME, Mielke A, Wich SA and Shumaker RW (2016) Vocal fold control beyond the species-specific repertoire in an orang-utan. Scientific Reports. Epub ahead of print, 27 July. DOI: 10.1038/srep30315.
52.
LorimerJ (2012) Multinatural geographies for the Anthropocene. Progress in Human Geography36(5): 593–612.
53.
LynchME (1988) Sacrifice and the transformation of the animal body into a scientific object: Laboratory culture and ritual practice in the neurosciences. Social Studies of Science18(2): 265–289.
54.
MaloneNWadeAHFuentesARileyEPRemisMRobinsonCJ (2014) Ethnoprimatology: Critical interdisciplinarity and multispecies approaches in anthropology. Critique of Anthropology34(1): 8–29.
55.
MeloniM (2014) How biology became social, and what it means for social theory. The Sociological Review62: 593–614.
56.
MerchantNDFristrupKMJohnsonMPTyackPLWittMJBlondelPParksSE (2015) Measuring acoustic habitats. Methods in Ecology and Evolution6(3): 257–265.
57.
MichaelM (2012) Anecdote. In: LuryCWakefordN (eds) Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social, London: Routledge, pp. 25–35.
58.
MichaelMBirkeL (1994) Enrolling the core set: The case of the animal experimentation controversy. Social Studies of Science24(1): 81–95.
59.
MundyR (2009) Birdsong and the image of evolution. Society and Animals17: 206–223.
60.
NelsonNC (2013) Modeling mouse, human, and discipline: Epistemic scaffolds in animal behavior genetics. Social Studies of Science43(1): 3–29.
61.
O'Connell-RodwellCEWoodJDWymanMRedfieldSHartLAPuriaS (2012) Antiphonal vocal bouts associated with departures in free-ranging African elephant family groups (Loxodonta africana). Bioacoustics21(3): 215–224.
62.
Obrist MK, Pavan G, Sueur J, Riede K, Llusia D and Marquez R (2010) Bioacoustics approaches in biodiversity inventories. In: Eymann J, Degreef J, Häuser CL, Monje JC, Samyn Y and Vandan Spiegel D (eds) Manual on Field Recording Techniques and Protocols for all Taxa Biodiversity Inventories. ABC Taxa 8(1): 68–99.
63.
PijanowskiBCFarinaAGageSHDumyahnSLKrauseBL (2011) What is soundscape ecology? An introduction and overview of an emerging new science. Landscape Ecology26(9): 1213–1232.
64.
PortforsCV (2007) Types and functions of ultrasonic vocalizations in laboratory rats and mice. Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science46(1): 28–34.
65.
RadickG (2007) The Simian Tongue: The Long Debate about Animal Language, Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
RempelRSHobsonKAHolbornGWilgenburgSLVElliottJ (2005) Bioacoustic monitoring of forest songbirds: Interpreter variability and effects of configuration and digital processing methods in the laboratory. Journal of Field Ornithology76(1): 1–11.
68.
RosenJ (2017) Sustainability: A greener future. Nature546(7659): 565–567.
69.
Savage-RumbaughSWambaKWambaPWambaN (2007) Welfare of apes in captive environments: Comments on, and by, a specific group of apes. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science10(1): 7–19.
70.
SchaferRM (1994) The Soundscape, Rochester, VT: Destiny Books.
71.
ServickK (2014) Eavesdropping on ecosystems. Science343(6173): 834–837.
72.
ShadlenMNGoldJL (2004) The neurophysiology of decision making as a window on cognition. In: GazzanigaMS (ed.) The Cognitive Neurosciences III, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1229–1243.
73.
SlabbekoornHPeetM (2003) Birds sing at a higher pitch in urban noise. Nature424(267).
SouléME (1985) What is conservation biology?.. Bioscience35: 727–734.
76.
StieglerB (1994) Technics and Time, I: The Fault of Epimetheus, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
77.
SwedbergR (2014) The Art of Social Theory, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
78.
SzostakRGnoliCLópez-HuertasM (2016) The needs of interdisciplinary research. In: Interdisciplinary Knowledge Organization, Berlin: Springer International, pp. 35–64.
79.
TegelerAKMorrisonMLSzewczakJM (2012) Using extended-duration audio recordings to survey avian species. Wildlife Society Bulletin36(1): 21–29.
80.
TønnessenM (2015) The biosemiotic glossary project: Agent, agency. Biosemiotics8: 125–143.
81.
TowseyMWimmerJWilliamsonIRoeP (2014) The use of acoustic indices to determine avian species richness in audio-recordings of the environment. Ecological Informatics. (21, 110–119.
82.
UptonB (2015) The Aesthetic of Play, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
83.
Von UexküllJ (1982) Glossary. Semiotica42(1): 83–87.
84.
Von Uexküll J (2010) A Foray into the Worlds of Animals and Humans, with A Theory of Meaning, trans. O'Neil JD. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
85.
WaltersCLCollenALucasTMrozKSayerCAJonesKE (2013) Challenges of using bioacoustics to globally monitor bats. In: AdamsRPedersenSC (eds) Bat Evolution, Ecology, and Conservation, New York: Springer, pp. 479–499.
86.
WarrenPSKattiMErmannMBrazelA (2006) Urban bioacoustics: It's not just noise. Animal Behaviour71(3): 491–502.
87.
WatsonMC (2016) On multispecies mythology: A critique of animal anthropology. Theory, Culture & Society33(5): 159–172. DOI: 0263276416637128.
88.
WolfeC (2010) What Is Posthumanism?, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
