This article critically engages the postsecular turn in feminism by focusing on recent contributions by Judith Butler, Rosi Braidotti, and Saba Mahmood, whose stance can be seen as symptomatic of the postsecular moment. The article demonstrates that their conjoint theoretical moves have unintended yet important implications, which are left unexamined. Whilst recognizing the importance of the effort of postsecular feminism to think of agency beyond the limitations of Eurocentric theorizing, the article argues that it remains unclear whether the particular conceptualization of agency, as detached from autonomy, can have counter-hegemonic effects. The article is concerned with the politics that the postsecular turn in feminism authorizes, and for this purpose it questions to what extent postsecular feminist theorizing risks the neutralization of critical social theory itself, because abandoning autonomy as the foundation of political subjectivity does not allow for the interrogation of arbitrary authorities and the social inequalities that they sustain.
AbbasS (2013) The echo chamber of freedom: The Muslim women and the pretext of agency. boundary 240(1): 155–189.
2.
Abu-LughodL (2002) Do Muslim women really need saving? Anthropological reflections on cultural relativism and its others. American Anthropologist104(3): 783–790.
ArnasonJP (1989) The imaginary constitution of modernity. Revue européenne des sciences sociales86: 323–337.
5.
AsadT (1993) Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
6.
AsadT (1998 [1973]) Anthropology and the Colonial Encounter, Amherst, NY: Humanity Books.
7.
AsadT (2003) Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
8.
AsadT (2006) Responses. In: ScottDHirschkindC (eds) Powers of the Secular Modern: Talal Asad and His Interlocutors, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 206–303.
9.
BangstadS (2010) Saba Mahmood and anthropological criticism after virtue. Theory, Culture & Society28(3): 28–54.
10.
BhimjiF (2009) Identities and agency in religious spheres: A study of British Muslim women’s experience. Gender, Place and Culture16(4): 365–380.
11.
BilgramiA (2004) Secularism and relativism. boundary 231(2): 173–196.
12.
BrackeS (2008) Conjugating the modern/religious, conceptualizing female religious agency: Contours of a ‘post-secular’ conjuncture. Theory, Culture & Society25(6): 51–67.
13.
BraidottiR (2008) In spite of the times: The postsecular turn in feminism. Theory, Culture & Society26(6): 1–24.
14.
BrownW (2008) Regulating Aversion: Tolerance in the Age of Identity and Empire, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15.
ButlerJ (2004) Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence, London: Verso.
16.
ButlerJ (2008) Sexual politics, torture and secular time. The British Journal of Sociology59(1): 1–23.
17.
ButlerJ (2009) Frames of War: When Is Life Grievable?, London: Verso.
18.
ButlerJ (2009) The sensibility of critique: Response to Asad and Mahmood. In: AsadTBrownWButlerJMahmoodS (eds) Is Critique Secular? Blasphemy, Injury and Free Speech, Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 101–136.
ChakrabartyD (1995) Radical histories and the question of Enlightenment rationalism: Some recent critiques of ‘subaltern studies’. Economic and Political Weekly30(14): 751–759.
21.
ChakrabartyD (2000) Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22.
CloughPTHalleyJ (2007) The Affective Turn: Theorizing the Social, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
23.
ConnollyWE (1999) Why I Am Not a Secularist, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
24.
CooperM (2008) Orientalism in the mirror: The sexual politics of anti-westernism. Theory, Culture & Society25(6): 25–49.
25.
DeebL (2006) An Enchanted Modern: Gender and Public Piety in Shi’i Lebanon, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26.
DirlikA (1999) Is there history after Eurocentrism? Globalism, postcolonialism, and the disavowal of history. Cultural Critique42: 1–34.
27.
FadilN (2009) Managing affects and sensibilities: The case of not-handshaking and not-fasting. Social Anthropology/Anthropologie Sociale17(4): 439–454.
28.
FraserN (1985) What’s critical about critical theory? The case of Habermas and gender. New German Critique35: 97–131.
29.
GourgourisG (2008a) Antisecularist failures: A counterresponse to Saba Mahmood. Public Culture20(3): 453–459.
30.
GourgourisS (2008b) Detranscendentalizing the secular. Public Culture20(3): 437–445.
31.
GrosfoguelR (2009) A decolonial approach to political-economy: Transmodenity, border thinking and global coloniality. Kult6: 10–38.
32.
HallwardP (2001) Absolutely Postcolonial: Writing between the Singular and the Specific, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
33.
HanssenB (2000) Critique of Violence: Between Poststructuralism and Critical Theory, London: Routledge.
34.
HartWD (2000) Edward Said and the Religious Effects of Culture, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
HemmingsC (2005) Invoking affect: Cultural theory and the ontological turn. Cultural Studies19(5): 548–567.
36.
HollywoodA (2004) Gender, agency and the divine in religious historiography. The Journal of Religion84(4): 514–528.
37.
IrigarayL (1993) Divine women. In: Sexes and Genealogies, trans Gill GC, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 55–72.
38.
KaplanE (2004) With God on Our Side: George W. Bush and the Christian Right, New York: The New Press.
39.
KlassenP (2004) Agency, embodiment and scrupulous women (review article). Journal of Religion84: 592–603.
40.
LeezenbergM (2010) How ethnocentric is the concept of the postsecular? In: MolendijkALBeaumontJJedanC (eds) The Religious, the Political and the Urban., Leiden: Brill, pp. 91–112.
41.
LinkerD (2005) The Theocons: Secular America under Siege, New York: Anchor Books.
42.
MahmoodS (2001) Feminist theory, embodiment, and the docile agent: Some reflections on the Egyptian Islamic revival. Cultural Anthropology16(2): 202–236.
43.
MahmoodS (2003) Ethical formation and the politics of individual autonomy in contemporary Egypt. Social Research70(3): 1501–1530.
44.
MahmoodS (2005) The Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
45.
MahmoodS (2006) Secularism, hermeneutics, and empire: The politics of Islamic reformation. Public Culture18(2): 323–347.
McLennanG (2010) The postsecular turn. Theory, Culture & Society27(4): 3–20.
48.
MignoloW (2000) Local Histories/Global Design: Coloniality, Border Thinking and Subaltern Knowledge, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
49.
NandyA (2002) Time Warps: The Insistent Politics of Silent and Evasive Pasts, London: Hurst.
50.
NandyA (2003) The Romance of the State and the Fate of Dissent in the Tropics, New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
51.
Rinaldo R (2006) Feminism in uncertain times: Islam, democratization, and women activists in Indonesia. Paper presented at the 8th Annual Conference on Globalization held at the University of Chicago, 11 April. Available at: http://cas.uchicago.edu/workshops/scg/conference/2006/index.html (accessed August 2013).
52.
RobbinsB (2013a) Is the postcolonial also postsecular?boundary 240(1): 245–262.
53.
RobbinsB (2013b) Why I am not a postsecularist. boundary 240(1): 56–76.
54.
RoseneilS (1995) The coming of age of feminist sociology: Some issues of practice and theory for the next twenty years. The British Journal of Sociology46(2): 191–205.
SmithAPWhistlerD (2010) After the Postsecular and the Postmodern: New Essays in Continental Philosophy of Religion, Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
57.
TaylorC (2007) A Secular Age, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
58.
Vasilaki R (2012) Provincializing IR? Prospects and Deadlocks in post-Western IR Theory. Millennium – Journal of International Studies 41(1): 3–22.
59.
Vasilaki R (2013) Between Postcolonialism and Radical Historicism: the Contested Muslim Political Subject. In: Nash G Kerr-Koch K and Hackett S (eds) Postcolonialism and Islam. Theory, Literature, Culture, Society and Film. London: Routledge, pp. 65–75.
60.
WaggonerM (2005) Irony, embodiment, and the ‘critical attitude’: Engaging Saba Mahmood’s critique of secular morality. Culture and Religion6(2): 237–261.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
