Postcolonial science studies entails ostensibly contradictory critical and empirical commitments. Science studies scholars influenced by Bruno Latour and Isabelle Stengers embrace forms of realist, radical empiricism, while postcolonial studies scholars influenced by Jacques Derrida trace the limits of the knowable. This essay takes their common use of the term cosmopolitics as an unexpected point of departure for reconciling Derrida’s program with Stengers’s and Latour’s. I read Derrida’s critique of hospitality and Stengers’s and Latour’s ontological politics as necessary complements for conceiving a care-oriented subalternist cosmopolitics, a process of composing common worlds that remains attentive to the limits of representation.
AppiahKA (2005) The Ethics of Identity, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2.
Archibugi D (ed.) (2003) Debating Cosmopolitics. New York: Verso.
3.
ArendtH (1982) Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4.
BakerG (2010) The ‘double law’ of hospitality: Rethinking cosmopolitan ethics in humanitarian intervention. International Relations24(1): 87–103.
5.
BarnettC (2005) Ways of relating: Hospitality and the acknowledgement of otherness. Progress in Human Geography29(1): 5–21.
6.
BeckU (2004) The truth of others: A cosmopolitan approach. Common Knowledge10(3): 430–449.
7.
BeckU (2005) Neither order nor peace: A response to Bruno Latour. Common Knowledge11(1): 1–7.
8.
Beck U and Grande E (2010) Varieties of second modernity: The cosmopolitan turn in social and political theory and research. The British Journal of Sociology 61(3): 409–443.
9.
BryantLR (2011) The Democracy of Objects, Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press.
10.
Bryant LR, Srnicek N and Harman G (eds) (2011) The Speculative Turn: Continental Materialism and Realism. Melbourne: re.press.
11.
CandeaM (2008) Fire and identity as matters of concern in Corsica. Anthropological Theory8(2): 201–216.
12.
Candea M and da Col G (2012) The return to hospitality. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 18(S1): S1–S19.
13.
Carrithurs M, Candea M, Sykes K, Holbraad M and Venkatesan S (2010) Ontology is just another word for culture: Motion tabled at the 2008 Meeting of the Group for Debates in Anthropological Theory, University of Manchester. Critique of Anthropology 30(2): 152–200.
14.
ChakrabartyD (2000) Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
15.
ChakrabartyD (2002) Habitations of Modernity: Essays in the Wake of Subaltern Studies, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
ChakrabartyD (2009) The climate of history: Four theses. Critical Inquiry35(2): 197–222.
17.
Cheah P and Robbins B (eds) (1998) Cosmopolitics: Thinking and Feeling beyond the Nation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
18.
ClarkN (2011) Inhuman Nature: Sociable Life on a Dynamic Planet, London: SAGE.
19.
Critchley S and Kearney R (2001) Series editors’ preface. In: Derrida J, On Cosmopolitanism and Forgiveness. New York: Routledge, vii–xii.
20.
Crutzen PJ and Stoermer EF (2000) The anthropocene. Global Change Newsletter 41(1): 17–18.
21.
De la CadenaM (2010) Indigenous cosmopolitics in the Andes: Conceptual reflections beyond ‘politics’. Cultural Anthropology25(2): 334–370.
22.
DeLandaM (2002) Intensive Science and Virtual Philosophy, New York: Continuum.
23.
Deleuze G and Guattari F (1987 [1980]) A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
24.
Deleuze G and Guattari F (1994) What is Philosophy? New York: Columbia University Press.
25.
DerridaJ (2001) On Cosmopolitanism and Forgiveness, New York: Routledge.
26.
DerridaJ (2002) The animal that therefore I am (more to follow). Critical Inquiry28(2): 369–418.
27.
Derrida J and Dufourmantelle A (2000) Of Hospitality. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
28.
EspositoR (2008) Bíos: Biopolitics and Philosophy, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
29.
EspositoR (2011) Immunitas: The Protection and Negation of Life, Cambridge: Polity Press.
30.
FleckL (1981 [1935]) Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31.
FortunK (2003) Ethnography in/of/as open systems. Reviews in Anthropology32: 171–190.
32.
Foucault M (1977) Intellectuals and power: A conversation between Michel Foucault and Gilles Deleuze. In: Bouchard DF (ed.) Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews by Michel Foucault. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 205–217.
33.
GilroyP (2010) Planetarity and cosmopolitics. The British Journal of Sociology61(3): 620–626.
34.
GuhaR (2002) History at the Limit of World-History, New York: Columbia University Press.
35.
HägglundM (2008) Radical Atheism: Derrida and the Time of Life, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
36.
HarawayDJ (2008) When Species Meet, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
37.
HarmanG (2009) Prince of Networks: Bruno Latour and Metaphysics, Melbourne: re.press.
38.
HarmanG (2011) The Quadruple Object, Winchester: Zero Books.
39.
HarveyD (2000) Cosmopolitanism and the banality of geographic evils. Public Culture12(2): 529–564.
40.
HaydenC (2005) Bioprospecting’s representational dilemma. Science as Culture14(2): 185–200.
41.
Kant I (1991 [1795]) Perpetual peace: A philosophical sketch. In: Reiss H (ed.) Kant: Political Writing, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 93–130.
42.
KellySK (2004) Derrida’s cities of refuge: Toward a non-utopian utopia. Contemporary Justice Review7(4): 421–439.
43.
Kirksey SE and Helmreich S (2010) The emergence of multispecies ethnography. Cultural Anthropology 25(4): 545–576.
44.
LatourB (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45.
LatourB (1988) The Pasteurization of France, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46.
LatourB (1993) We Have Never Been Modern, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47.
Latour B (1999a) Circulating reference: Sampling the soil in the Amazon forest. In: Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 24–79.
48.
LatourB (1999b) Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49.
LatourB (2004a) Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
50.
LatourB (2004b) Whose cosmos, whose cosmopolitics? Comments on the peace terms of Ulrich Beck. Common Knowledge10(3): 450–492.
51.
LatourB (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52.
Latour B and Woolgar S (1986 [1979]) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
53.
MeillassouxQ (2008) After Finitude: An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency, New York: Continuum.
54.
Melville H (1969 [1853]) Bartleby the scrivener: A tale of Wall Street. In: Berthoff W (ed.) Great Short Works of Herman Melville. New York: HarperCollins, 39–40.
55.
MitchellT (2002) Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity, Berkeley: University of California Press.
56.
Montag W (1998) Can the subaltern speak and other transcendental questions. Cultural Logic 1(2). Available at: http://clogic.eserver.org/1-2/montag.html (accessed January 2012).
57.
Morgan D and Banham G (eds) (2007) Cosmopolitics and the Emergence of a Future. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
58.
MortonT (2011) Here comes everything: The promise of object-oriented ontology. Qui Parle: Critical Humanities and Social Sciences19(2): 163–190.
59.
PopperK (1959 [1934]) The Logic of Scientific Discovery, New York: Routledge.
60.
Puig de la BellacasaM (2011) Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things. Social Studies of Science41(1): 85–106.
61.
RheinbergerH-J (1997) Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
62.
Rose DB (ed.) (2009) Writing in the anthropocene. Australian Humanities Review 47.
63.
SerresM (2007 [1980]) The Parasite, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
64.
Spivak GC (1974) Translator’s preface. In: Derrida J Of Grammatology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, ix–lxxxvi.
65.
Spivak G C (1988) Can the subaltern speak? In: Nelson C and Grossberg L (eds) Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 271–313.
66.
Stengers I (2005) The cosmopolitical proposal. In: Latour B and Weibel P (eds) Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 994–1003.
67.
StengersI (2010) Cosmopolitics I, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
68.
StengersI (2011) Cosmopolitics II, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
69.
StrathernM (1996) Cutting the network. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute2(3): 517–535.
70.
Viveiros de CastroE (1998) Cosmological deixis and Amerindian perspectivism. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute4(3): 469–488.
71.
Viveiros de CastroE (2004) Exchanging perspectives: The transformation of objects into subjects in Amerindian ontologies. Common Knowledge10(3): 463–484.
72.
Von UexküllJ (2010 [1934]) A Foray into the Worlds of Animals and Humans, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
73.
WatsonMC (2011) Cosmopolitics and the subaltern: Problematizing Latour’s idea of the commons. Theory, Culture & Society28(3): 55–79.
74.
WatsonMC (2012) Staged discovery and the politics of Maya hieroglyphic things. American Anthropologist114(2): 282–296.
75.
WestmorelandMW (2008) Interruptions: Derrida and hospitality. Kritike2(1): 1–10.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
