Focusing on a subject the author has extensively engaged with over the years (most notably in his 2010 study Der Diener), the article develops the notion of service as a cultural technique, and the media-theoretical figure of the servant as its servomechanism. The analysis follows three distinct scenarios that highlight, via different channels of perception (acoustic, optic and haptic), the interplay between corporeal practices and media objects in the production of specific cultural effects. In each of the examples chosen, service implies highly regulated networks of recursive operational chains that regulate in their turn the production and distribution of power and knowledge. Thus, Krajewski argues, despite, or rather, precisely because of their apparent marginality and invisibility, the ‘small gestures’ of service join the ranks of already established, elementary symbolic techniques such as reading or writing.
BebelA. ([1892] 1996) Die Frau und der Sozialismus (Die Frau in der Vergangenheit, Gegenwart und Zukunft)Vol. 10/2. München: K.G. Saur.
2.
Foucault, M. ([1982] 2002) ‘The Subject and Power’, pp. 326–348 in Power: Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, Volume 3, ed. J. Faubion. London: Penguin.
3.
HackländerF.W. ([1854] 1875) Europäisches Sklavenleben. F. W. Hackländers Werke. Erste Gesammt-Ausgabe, Stuttgart: U. Kröner.
4.
HechtJ.J. (1956) The Domestic Servant Class in Eighteenth-century England, London: Routledge & Paul.
5.
Hegel, G.W.F. ([1807] 1988) Phänomenologie des Geistes, ed. H. Wessels and H. Clairmont. Vol. 414. Philosophische Bibliothek. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.
6.
Kafka, F. ([1915] 1995) ‘Before the Law’, trans. W. and E. Muir, in Franz Kafka: The Complete Stories, ed. N. Glatzer. New York: Schocken Books.
7.
Kafka, F. ([1917] 2011) ‘A Message from the Emperor’, trans. M. Harman, The New York Review of Books 58(14): 41.
8.
Lamont-BrownR. (2000) John Brown: Queen Victoria’s Highland Servant, Stroud: Sutton.
9.
MachoT. (2005) Die Bäume des Alphabets. Neue Rundschau116(2): 66–80.
10.
MarshallD. (1949) The English Domestic Servant in HistoryVol. G 13. General series. London: Philip.
11.
MayeH. (2010) Was ist eine Kulturtechnik?Zeitschrift für Medien- und Kulturforschung1(1): 121–135.
12.
McLuhanM. (1964) Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man, New York: McGraw-Hill.
13.
PorterR. (1990) English Society in the Eighteenth Century, The Penguin Social History of Britain. London: Penguin.
14.
RobbinsB. (1986) The Servant’s Hand: English Fiction from Below, New York: Columbia University Press.
15.
SchmittC. ([1954] 2008) Gespräch über die Macht und den Zugang zum Machthaber, Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
16.
SchüttpelzE. (2006) Die medienanthropologische Kehre der Kulturtechniken. Archiv für Mediengeschichte6: 87–110.
Skrine, P. (1985) ‘Das Bild des Dieners in der deutschen Literatur des 17. Jahrhunderts’, pp. 245–257 in W. Brückner, P. Blickle, and D. Breuer (eds) Literatur und Volk im 17. Jahrhundert. Probleme populärer Kultur in Deutschland. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
19.
TreitschkeH. (1875) Der Socialismus und seine Gönner, Berlin: Georg Reimer.
