How can sovereignty provide the premises to think outside of sovereignty? In other words, how is it possible to perceive of resistance to sovereignty which itself is deemed to have been caught up in the double bind of sovereignty? With a critical appraisal of theories on the ‘state of exception’ in conversation with Robert Jungk’s consideration of the ‘nuclear state’, I account for the nuclear state of exception which has acquired sovereignty in several nations in the post-Second World War scenario, before going on to consider ‘spaces of exception’ to it. I then provide a critical appraisal of studies of resistance. Using the case of a public hearing on the Koodankulam nuclear power plant in south India, I account for how ways of conceptualizing contestation and challenges in the shadows of sovereignty can be pursued in what I describe as a case of ‘sovereignty without hegemony’.
AbrahamI. (1998) The Making of the Indian Atom Bomb: Science, Secrecy and the Postcolonial State, London: Zed Books.
2.
Abu-LughodL. (1986) Veiled Sentiments: Honor and Poetry in a Bedouin Society, Berkeley: University of California Press.
3.
Abu-LughodL. (1990) The romance of resistance: Tracing transformations of power through Bedouin women. American Ethnologist, 17(1): 41–55.
4.
Agamben, G. (1998) Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life, trans. Heller-Roazen D. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
5.
Agamben, G. (1999) Potentialities: Collected Essays in Philosophy, trans. Heller-Roazen D. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
6.
Agamben, G. (2005) State of Exception, trans. Attell K. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
AhearnL.M. (2001) Invitations to Love: Literacy, Love Letters, and Social Change in Nepal, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
8.
Alavi, H. (1982) State and class under peripheral capitalism. In: Alavi H and Shanin T (eds) Introduction to the Sociology of ‘Developing’ Societies. New York: Monthly Review Press, pp. 289–307.
9.
AronowitzS. (1988) Science as Power: Discourse and Ideology in Modern Society, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
10.
Balibar, E. (2002) Three concepts of politics: emancipation, transformation, civility. In: Politics and the Other Scene. London: Verso.
BayatA. (2013) Life as Politics: How Ordinary People Change the Middle East, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
13.
BeckU. (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, London: Sage.
14.
Beck, U. (2006) The Cosmopolitan Vision, trans. Cronin C. Cambridge: Polity Press.
15.
BidwaiP.VanaikA. (1999) South Asia on a Short Fuse: Nuclear Politics and the Future of Global Disarmament, New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
16.
Calhoun, C. (ed.) (1992) Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17.
ChakrabartyD. (2007) “In the name of politics’”: Democracy and the power of the multitude in India. Public Culture, 19(1): 35–57.
18.
ChatterjeeP. (1993) Nationalist Thought and the Colonial World: A Derivative Discourse, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
19.
ChatterjeeP. (2004) The Politics of the Governed, New York: Columbia University Press.
20.
ComaroffJ. (1993) Modernity and its Malcontents: Ritual and Power in Postcolonial Africa, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21.
Das, V. (1995) Suffering, legitimacy and healing. In: Critical Events: An Anthropological, Perspective on Contemporary India. Delhi: Oxford University Press, pp. 136–174.
22.
De CerteauM. (1988) The Practices of Everyday Life, Berkeley: University of California Press.
FortunK. (2001) Advocacy after Bhopal: Environmentalism, Disaster, New Global Orders, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25.
FoucaultM. (1982) The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4): 777–795.
26.
Foucault, M. (1988) Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977--1978, ed. Senellart M, trans. Burchell G. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
27.
Foucault, M. (1990) The History of Sexuality, vol. 1: An Introduction, trans. Hurley R. London: Vintage.
28.
Foucault, M. (2010) The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978--1979, trans. Burchell G. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
29.
Goyal, S.L. (2002) Court Master c/o The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice R.P. Sethi and Mr. Justice Arijit Pasayat, writ petition (civil) no.286/2002.
30.
GuhaR. (1997) Dominance without Hegemony: History and Power in Colonial India, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
GustersonH. (2004) People of the Bomb: Portraits of America’s Nuclear Complex, Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.
32.
HabermasJ. (1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33.
Hansen, T.B. and Stepputat, F. (eds) (2006) ‘Sovereignty revisited’, Annual Review of Anthropology 35: 295--315.
34.
HardimanD. (2003) Gandhi: In his Time and Ours, New Delhi: Permanent Black.
35.
HuysmansJ. (2008) The jargon of exception – on Schmitt, Agamben and the absence of political society. International Political Sociology, 2(2): 165–183.
36.
JenningR.J. (2011) Sovereignty and political modernity: A genealogy of Agamben’s critique of sovereignty. Anthropological Theory, 11(23): 23–61.
37.
Jungk, R. (1979) The Nuclear State, trans. Mosbacher E. London: John Calder.
KaurR. (2012b) Nuclear power vs. people power.. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 9 July.
42.
KuletzV. (1998) The Tainted Desert: Environmental and Social Ruin in the American West, New York: Routledge.
43.
Kundu, A. (2003) India’s National Security under the BJP/NDA: ‘Strong at Home, Engaged Abroad’. Brussels: European Institute for Asian Studies. Available at: http://www.eias.org/sites/default/files/kunduindia2.pdf (accessed February 2013).
44.
LatourB. (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
45.
MascoJ. (2006) The Nuclear Borderlands, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
46.
MascoJ. (2008) “Survival is your business”: Engineering ruins and affect in nuclear America. Cultural Anthropology, 23(2): 361–398.
47.
MbembeA. (2001) On the Postcolony, Berkeley: University of California Press.
48.
MbembeA. (2003) Necropolitics. Public Culture, 15(1): 11–40.
49.
MichaelM. (2006) Technoscience and Everyday Life: The Complex Simplicities of the Mundane, Maidenhead: Open University Press.
50.
O’HanlonR. (1988) Recovering the subject: Subaltern studies and histories of resistance in colonial South Asia. Modern Asian Studies, 22: 189–224.
51.
OngA. (1987) Spirits of Resistance and Capitalist Discipline: Factory Women in Malaysia, Albany: State University of New York Press.
52.
PerkovichG. (2000) India’s Nuclear Bomb: The Impact on Global Proliferation, New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
53.
PetrynaA. (2002) Life Exposed: Biological Citizens after Chernobyl, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
54.
RahejaG.G.GoldA.G. (1994) Listen to the Heron’s Words: Reimagining Gender and Kinship in North India, Berkeley: University of California Press.
55.
Rajan SR (1999) Bhopal: vulnerability, routinization, and the chronic disaster. In: Oliver-Smith A and Hoffman M (eds) The Angry Earth: Disaster in Anthropological Perspective. New York: Routledge, pp. 257–277.
56.
Ramana, M.V. (2008) India's nuclear enclave and the practice of secrecy. In: Abraham I (ed.) South Asian Cultures of the Bomb: Atomic Publics and the State in India and Pakistan. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
57.
RamanaM.V.RaoD.B. (2013) The environmental impact assessment process for nuclear facilities: An examination of the Indian experience. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30(4): 268–271.
58.
Robbins, B. (ed.) (1993) The Phantom Public Sphere. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
59.
Sabu, K. (2011) The age of meta/physical struggle. HOT SPOTS, 3.11 politics in disaster Japan. Cultural Anthropology. Available at: http://www.culanth.org/?q=node/422 (accessed February 2013).
60.
SaganS.D. (1996/97) Why do states build nuclear weapons? Three models in search of a bomb. International Security, 21: 73–85.
61.
SchmittC. (1985 [1927]) Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty, trans. Schwab G, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
62.
ScottJ.C. (1990) Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
63.
SerresM.with LatourB. (1995) Conversations on Science, Culture and Time, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
