This article is concerned with how the idea of anachronism can interfere with our thinking about social justice, peace, and human liberation. In the case of Israel/Palestine the idea of anachronism is deployed among liberals, progressives and radical theorists, and activists seeking peace and social justice who express animosity toward religiously motivated settlers and their settlement project. One of the ways in which they differentiate themselves from these settlers is by suggesting that settler actions belong to the past. They also pity Palestinians conceived of as stuck in an oppressive system of settler colonialism that also belongs to the past, preventing them from moving forward. Both perceptions of anachronism limit the ways we can think about human liberation and peace. This article sheds light on a conundrum about who or what belongs to the past, and how thinking in such terms can contribute to the production of a particular moral collective and to the production of enmity. Both perceptions of anachronism frame history as a kind of progress in which peoples or groups might be ranked according to their levels of civilizational attainment, an idea we abandoned long ago as an analytical tool, but seem to have retained as a matter of practical political sympathy and judgment. This temporal conditioning can interfere with the thinking of even some of the most progressive social theorists, and mimics a colonial impulse.
AbramsonL. (2009) What does landscape want? A walk in W.J.T. Mitchell’s holy landscape. Culture, Theory and Critique, 50(2–3): 275–288.
2.
AlcalayA. (1993) After Jews and Arabs: Remaking Levantine Culture, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
3.
AndersonB. (1991[1983]) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, rev. edn. London: Verso.
4.
Asad, T. (2006) Responses. In: Scott D. and Hirschkind C. (eds) Powers of the Secular Modern: Talal Asad and His Interlocutors (Cultural Memory in the Present). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 206–243.
5.
AuerbachJ. (2009) Hebron Jews: Memory and Conflict in the Land of Israel, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
6.
Bhabha H. (1994) Of mimicry and man: The ambivalence of colonial discourse. In: The Location of Culture. London: Routledge, 85–92.
7.
BamyehM. (2003) Palestine: Listening to the inaudible. South Atlantic Quarterly, 102(4): 825–849.
8.
BamyehM. (2009) Anarchy as Order: The History and Future of Civic Humanity, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
9.
BamyehM. (2010) On humanizing abstractions: The path beyond Fanon. Theory, Culture & Society, 27(7–8): 52–65.
10.
Benjamin, W. (1968[1940]) Theses on the philosophy of history. In: Arendt H. (ed.) Illuminations. New York: Schocken Books.
11.
BoyarinJ. (1996) Palestine and Jewish History: Criticism at the Borders of Ethnography, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
12.
ButlerJ. (2008) Sexual politics, torture, and secular time. British Journal of Sociology, 59(1): 1–23.
13.
Campos, M. (2007) Remembering Jewish–Arab contact and conflict. In: Sufian S. and LeVine M. (eds) Reapproaching Borders: New Perspectives on the Study of Israel–Palestine. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
14.
ChakrabartyD. (2000) Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15.
ConnollyW.E. (1999) Why I Am Not a Secularist, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
16.
Cooper, F. and Stoler, A.L. (1997) Tensions of Empire: Colonial Cultures in a Bourgeois World. Berkeley: University of California Press.
17.
DalsheimJ. (2005) Antagonizing settlers in the colonial present of Israel–Palestine. Social Analysis, 49(2): 122–143.
18.
DalsheimJ. (2008a) Twice removed: Mizrahim in Gush Katif. Social Identities, 14(5): 535–551.
19.
Dalsheim, J. (2008b) Recognizing demonized Muslims, recognizing vilified Jews: Are the moral imperatives converging? Paper presented at the Association of Israel Studies Annual Meetings, New York University, New York.
20.
DalsheimJ. (2010) On demonized Muslims and vilified Jews: Between theory and politics. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 52(3): 581–603.
21.
DalsheimJ. (2011) Unsettling Gaza: Secular Liberalism, Radical Religion, and the Israeli Settlement Project, New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
Dalsheim, J. (nd) Theory for praxis: Peacemaking, cunning recognition, and the constitution of enmity. Submitted to Social Analysis.
23.
DalsheimJ.HarelA. (2009) Representing settlers. Review of Middle East Studies, 43(2): 219–238.
Ettinger, Y. and Lior, I. (2011) Menahem Froman, the rabbi of Tekoa, formally establishes ‘Eretz Shalom’. Haatretz.co.il, 27 February.
26.
EubenR. (1999) Enemy in the Mirror: Islamic Fundamentalism and the Limits of Modern Rationalism, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27.
FabianJ. (1983) Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes its Object, New York: Columbia University Press.
28.
FabianJ. (2006) The other revisited. Anthropological Theory, 6(2): 139–152.
29.
Fanon, F. (1963[1961]) The Wretched of the Earth, trans. C. Farrington. New York: Grove Press.
30.
Fanon, F. (1967) Black Skins, White Masks, trans. C.L. Markmann. New York: Grove Press.
31.
Foucault, M. (1988[1984]) The ethic of care for the self as a practice of freedom: An interview with Michel Foucault (conducted by R. Fornet-Betancourt et al., trans. J.D. Gauthier). In: Bernauer J. and Rasmussen D. (eds) The Final Foucault. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32.
Freedland J. (2012) An exclusive corner of Hebron. The New York Review of Books, 23 February.
33.
GraeberD. (2002) The new anarchists. New Left Review, 13: 61–73.
34.
Gramsci, A. (1971) Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci, ed. Q. Hoare and G.N. Smith. New York: International Publishers.
35.
Grewal, I. and Kaplan, C. (1994) Scattered Hegemonies: Postmodernity and Transnational Feminist Practices. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
36.
HandelmanD. (2004) Nationalism and the Israeli State: Bureaucratic Logic in Public Events, Oxford: Berg.
37.
HardingS. (1991) Representing fundamentalism: The problem of the repugnant cultural other. Social Research, 58(2): 373–393.
38.
KhazzoomA. (2005) Did the Israeli state engineer segregation? On the placement of Jewish immigrants in development towns in the 1950s. Social Forces, 84(1): 115–134.
39.
Lazaroff, T. (2012) A sheikh, settlers and MPs meet in Hebron Hills tent. The Jerusalem Post, 7 July.
40.
Lustick, I. (1994) Preface to the 1994 edition. In: For the Land and the Lord: Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel. New York: Council on Foreign Relations Books.
41.
MahmoodS. (2005) Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
42.
Mayne, H. (2012) Nofharim: An ethnography of women in a Jewish West Bank settlement. Master’s thesis, University of Florida.
43.
MehtaU. (1990) Liberal strategies of exclusion. Politics and Society, 18: 427–454.
44.
MemmiA. (1967) The Colonizer and the Colonized, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
45.
NandyA. (1983) The Intimate Enemy: Loss and Recovery of Self under Colonialism, Delhi: Oxford University Press.
46.
NimniE. (2003) The Challenge of Post-Zionism: Alternatives to Israeli Fundamentalist Politics, London: Zed.
47.
NusseibehS. (2011) What is a Palestinian State Worth?, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48.
OngA. (1993) On the edge of empires: Flexible citizenship among Chinese in diaspora. positions, 11(3): 745–778.
49.
OngA. (2006) Neoliberalism as Exception: Mutations in Citizenship and Sovereignty, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
ScottD. (2004) Conscripts of Modernity: The Tragedy of Colonial Enlightenment, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
56.
Scott, D. and Hirschkind, C. (eds) (2006) Powers of the Secular Modern: Talal Asad and His Interlocutors. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
57.
ShafirG. (1989) Land, Labor and the Origins of the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict, 1882–1914, New York: Cambridge University Press.
58.
ShenhavY. (2010) The Time of the Green Line [bemalkodet hakav ha yarok]: Towards a Jewish Political Thought, Tel Aviv: Am Oved (Hebrew).
59.
StarrettG. (2003) Violence and the rhetoric of images. Cultural Anthropology, 18(3): 398–428.
60.
Taylor, C. (1994) The politics of recognition. In: Gutman A. (ed.) Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
61.
TaylorC. (2002) Modern social imaginaries. Public Culture, 14(1): 91–124.
62.
TaylorC. (2007) A Secular Age, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
63.
Van der Veer, P. (2006) Pim Fortuyn, Theo van Gogh, and the politics of tolerance in the Netherlands. In: De Vries H. and Sullivan L.E. (eds) Political Theologies: Public Religions in a Post-Secular World. New York: Fordham University Press.
64.
Warschawski, M. (2005) On the Border, trans. L. Laub. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
65.
Watzman, H. (2011) The Mideast maverick: Sari Nusseibeh proposes an interim route to peace in the Midddle East. Chronicle of Higher Education, 30 January.
66.
Weinreich, M. (1980) History of the Yiddish Language, trans. S. Noble. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
67.
WhiteH. (1987) The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourses and Historical Representation, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
68.
WolfeP. (1999) Settler Colonialism and the Transformation of Anthropology: The Politics and Poetics of an Ethnographic Event, London: Cassell.
69.
YiftachelO. (2006) Ethnocracy: Land and Identity Politics in Israel/Palestine, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
70.
Zertal, I. and Eldar, A. (2007) Lords of the Land: The War for Israel’s Settlement in the Occupied Territories 1967–2007. New York: Nation Books.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
