Janet Harbord and Peter Mortimore
are at the Institute of Education of
the University of London. In this paper
they discuss the research needs of local
education authorities in the London
region, and the difficulties which they
currently face in trying to meet them.
Such research, they conclude, is
becoming more client led and this
implies that its findings need to be
disseminated more widely whilst also
being targeted to specific audiences.
They make some suggestions for
achieving this.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Audit Commission (1989) Losing an Empire, Finding a Role: the LEA of the Future. Audit Commission: London .
2.
Brewer, M.B. ( 1983) 'Evaluation: past and present' in Struening, E. L. and Brewer, M. B. (eds.) The University Edition of the Handbook of Evaluation Research, Sage: Beverly Hills, Ca l.
3.
Cordingley, P. and Riley, K. (1992) Local Authority Education Services: Threats, Challenges and Opportunities, The Institute of Local Government Studies : Birmingham University.
4.
Department of Education and Science (1992) White Paper: Choice and Diversity, HMSO: London.
5.
Glass, G.V. and Worthen, B.R. (1971) 'Evaluation and Research: similarities and differences ' in Curriculum Theory Network, Fall, 149-65.
6.
Goddard, D. and Leaske, M. (1992) The Search for Quality: Planning for Improvement and Managing Change, Paul Chapman Publishing Limited: London.
7.
Hargreaves, D. (1990) 'Shedding a tier', Times Educational Supplement, 9 November.
8.
Lancaster, D. (1990) 'Managing Computers as a Resource in Secondary Schools', in Saran, R. and Trafford, V. (eds.) Research in Education Management and Policy: Retrospect and Prospect, Falmer Press: Lewes.
9.
Nuttall, D., Thomas, S., and Goldstein, H. (1992) 'Report on Analysis of 1990 Examination Results' for the Association of Metropolitan Authorities, AMA:London.
10.
Macdonald, B. (1976) 'Evaluation and control of education' in Tawney, D. (ed.) Curriculum Evaluation Today: Trends and Implications, Macmillan Educational:London, 125-36.
11.
Ranson, S. (1992) The Role of Local Government in Education: Assuring quality and accountability, Longman:Essex.
12.
Riley, K. (1992) Quality — Education Indicators and the Search for Quality, Local Government Management Board: Birmingham.
13.
Streatfield, D. (1992) 'The Long March Towards Technology: Administrative and Managerial Computing in LEAs and Schools in England and Wales', International Journal of Educational Management6, 1, 17-24.