Debate about the future of local education authorities (LEAs) needs to embrace wider issues than the merits of particular management structures. How will LEAs be able to add most value in the future circumstances in which they will be operating? This article explores from first principles the issue of local educational leadership, and suggests three broad purposes to which LEAs can make a positive contribution: the provision of high-quality education, the development of a learning society and the building of capacity at institutional level. The article concludes that local educational leadership is itself essentially an educational process.
Audit Commission
(1999) Held in Trust: The LEA of the Future. London: Audit Commission.
3.
Bass, B.M.
and Avolio, B.J. (eds) (1994) Improving Organisational Effectiveness Through Transformational Leadership. London: Sage.
4.
Bollen, R.
(1996) ‘School Effectiveness and School Improvement: The Intellectual and Policy Context’, in D. Reynolds, R. Bollen, B. Creemers, D. Hopkins, L. Stoll and N. Lagerweij (eds) Making Good Schools: Linking School Effectiveness and School Improvement, pp. 1–20. London: Routledge.
5.
Caldwell, B.J.
(1997) ‘Global Trends and Expectations for the Further Reform of Schools’, in B. Davies and L. Ellison (eds) School Leadership for the Twenty-first Century, pp. 243–257. London: Routledge.
6.
Carr, W.
and Hartnett, A. (1996) Education and the Struggle for Democracy.Buckingham: Open University.
7.
Chapman, J.
and Aspin, D. (1997) ‘Autonomy and Mutuality: Quality Education and Self-Managing Schools’, in T. Townsend (ed.) Restructuring and Quality: Issues for Tomorrow’s School, pp. 61–77. London: Routledge.
8.
Cowen, R.
(1981) International Yearbook of Education33. Paris: UNESCO.
9.
Cresson, E.
(1998) Learning for Active Citizenship.Brussels: Commission of the European Union.
10.
Department for Education and Employment
(1999) Tackling Social Exclusion: Empowering People and Communities for a Better Future.A speech by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett MP, Secretary of State for Education and Employment, 16 June 1999. London: DfEE.
11.
Doherty, G.
(ed.) (1994) Developing Quality Systems in Education.London: Routledge.
12.
Epstein, J.L.
, Coates, L., Salinas, K.C., Sanders, M.G. and Simon, B.S. (1997) School, Family and Community Partnerships: Your Handbook for Action.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
13.
Hentschke, G.
and Davies, B. (1997) ‘Reconceptualising the Nature of Self-Managing Schools’, in B. Davies and L. Ellison (eds) School Leadership for the Twenty-first Century, pp. 23–35. London: Routledge.
14.
Johnson, S.M.
(1996) Leading to Change: The Challenge of the New Superintendency. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
15.
Kelly, A.V.
(1995) Education and Democracy.London: Paul Chapman.
16.
Lang, D.
(1999) ‘A New Theory of Leadership’, Educational Management & Administration27(2): 167–181.
17.
McLean, M.
(1995) Educational Traditions Compared.London: David Fulton.
18.
Ranson, S.
(1994) Towards the Learning Society.London: Cassell.
19.
Ranson, S.
(ed.) (1998) Inside the Learning Society.London: Cassell.
20.
Riley, K.
, Docking, J. and Rowles, D. (1998) ‘LEAs on probation: Will they Make the Grade?’, Education Review12(1): 30–34.
21.
Sallis, E.
(1993) Total Quality Management in Education. London: Kogan Page.
22.
Singleton, D.
(1998) ‘Do LEAs have a Future? An Ofsted Assessment’, Education Review12(1): 227–225.
23.
Smyth, J.
(ed.) (1993) A Socially Critical View of the Self-Managing School. London: Falmer.
24.
Stoll, L.
, Reynolds, D., Creemers, B. and Hopkins, D. (1996) ‘Merging School Effectiveness and School Improvement: Practical Examples’, in D. Reynolds, R. Bollen, B. Creemers, D. Hopkins, L. Stoll, and N. Lagerweij (eds) Making Good Schools: Linking School Effectiveness and School Improvement,pp. 113–145. London: Routledge.
25.
Thody, A. (1998) Lessons from the Past: Portents for the Future of Educational Leadership?Lincoln School of Management Working Paper 20. Lincoln: University of Lincolnshire and Humberside.
