This article argues for a reconceptualization of leadership. Possible substitutes for leadership are reviewed along with a number of existing dualisms. These are rejected in favour of the claim that the leadership of organizations is most appropriately understood as a distributed, rather thanas a focused, phenomenon. Various attributes, dimensions and applications of distribution are then considered, and a revised approach to action and influence in organizations centred on conjointly performed activities is thenproposed. For this new formulation a summary is provided of the core concepts of, and recent developments in, activity theory. It is shown that two particular advantages of this approach include the helpful model it provides for contextual analysis—an aspect sorely neglected by the field of leadership—and its focus on the evolving division of labour in organizations, the prime mover for tracking emerging patterns of distributed leadership.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Archer, M.S.
(1995) Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
Argyris, C.
(1979) ‘How Normal Science Methodology Makes Leadership Research Less Additive and Less Applicable’, in J.G. Hunt and L.L. Larson (eds) Crosscurrents in Leadership, pp. 47–73. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
3.
Barnard, C.I.
(1982) The Functions of the Executive.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bass, B.M.
and Steidlmeier, P. (1999) ‘Ethics, Character, and Authentic Transformational Leadership Behavior’, Leadership Quarterly10(2): 181–217.
6.
Blackler, F.
(1993) ‘Knowledge and the Theory of Organizations: Organizations as Activity Systems and the Reframing of Management’, Journal of Management Studies30(6): 863–884.
7.
Brown, M.H.
and Hosking, D.-M. (1986) ‘Distributed Leadership and Skilled Performance as Successful Organization in Social Movements’, Human Relations39(1): 65–79.
8.
Bryman, A.
(1996) ‘Leadership in Organizations’, in S.R. Clegg, C. Hardy and W. Nord (eds) Handbook of Organization Studies, pp.276–292. London: Sage.
9.
Burns, J.M. (1996) Empowerment for Change: A Conceptual Working Paper, The James MacGregor Burns Academy of Leadership, University of Maryland. <http:/www.academy.umd.edu/scholarship/casl/klspocs/jburn_p1.htm>
10.
Calder, B.J.
(1977) ‘An Attribution Theory of Leadership’, in B.M. Staw and G.R. Salancik (eds) New Directions in Organizational Behavior,pp. 179–204. Chicago, IL: St Clair.
11.
Clift, R.
, Zenz, K., Schacht, M. and Thurston, P.W. (1995) ‘Leadership and Change’, in R.T. Clift and P.W.Thurston (eds) Advances inEducational Administration, vol. 4, pp. 1–18. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
12.
Engestrm, Y.
(1999a) ‘Activity Theory and Individual and Social Transformation’, in Y. Engestrm, R. Meittinen and R.-L. Punamäki (eds) Perspectives on Activity Theory, pp. 19–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Engestrm, Y.
(1999b) ‘Expansive Visibilization of Work: An Activity-Theoretical Perspective’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work8(1): 63–93.
14.
Fukuyama, F.
(1992) The End of History and the Last Man.Harmondsworth: Penguin.
15.
Gee, J.P.
, Hull, G. and Lankshear, C. (1996) The New Work Order: Behind the Language of the New Capitalism.Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
16.
Gibb, C.A.
(1954) ‘Leadership’, in G. Lindzey (ed.) Handbook of Social Psychology, vol. 2, pp. 877–917. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
17.
Gibb, C.A.
(1968) ‘Leadership’, in G. Lindzey and E. Aronson(eds) Handbook of Social Psychology, vol. 4, 2nd edn, pp. 205–283. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
18.
Grey, C.
(1999) ‘“We are All Managers Now”; “WeAlways Were”: On the Development and Demise of Management’, Journal of Management Studies36(5): 561–585.
19.
Gronn, P.
(1982) ‘Neo-Taylorism in Educational Administration?’, Educational Administration Quarterly18(4): 17–35.
20.
Gronn, P.
(1984) ‘On Studying Administrators at Work’, Educational Administration Quarterly20(1): 115–129.
21.
Gronn, P.
(1986) ‘Politics, Power and the Management of Schools’, in E. Hoyle and A. McMahon (eds) The Management of Schools, pp. 45–54. London: Kogan Page.
22.
Gronn, P.
(1987) ‘Obituary for Structured Observation’, Educational Administration Quarterly23(2): 78–81.
23.
Gronn, P.
(1996) ‘From Transactions to Transformations: A New World Order in the Study of Leadership?’, Educational Management &Administration24(1): 7–30.
24.
Gronn, P.
(1999a) ‘Substituting for Leadership: The Neglected Roleof the Leadership Couple’, Leadership Quarterly10(1): 41–62.
25.
Gronn, P.
(1999b) ‘Systems of Distributed Leadership in Organisations’, paper presented to the Organisation Theory SIG at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal.
26.
Gronn, P.
(1999c) The Making of Educational Leaders.London: Cassell.
27.
Gronn, P.
and Ribbins, P. (1996) ‘Leaders in Context: Postpositivist Approaches to Understanding Educational Leadership’, Educational Administration Quarterly32(3): 452–473.
28.
Hallinger, P.
and Heck, R. (1999) ‘Can Leadership Enhance Effectiveness?’, in T. Bush, L. Bell, R. Bolam, R. Glatter and P. Ribbins (eds) Educational Management: Redefining Theory, Policy and Practice, pp. 178–190. London: Paul Chapman.
29.
Hardy, C.
and Clegg, S.R. (1999) ‘Some Dare Call it Power’, in S.R. Clegg and C. Hardy (eds) Studying Organization: Theory and Method, pp. 368–387. London: Sage.
30.
Heath, C.
and Luff, P. (1998) ‘Convergent Activities: Line Controland Passenger Information on the London Underground’, in Y. Engestrmand T. Middleton (eds) Cognition and Communication at Work, pp. 96–129. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Hodgson, R.C.
, Levinson, D.J. and Zaleznik, A. (1965) The Executive Role Constellation: An Analysis of Personality and Role Relations in Management.Boston, MA: Harvard University, Graduate School of Business Administration.
32.
Hunt, J.G.
(1999) ‘Transformational/Charismatic Leadership’sTransformation of the Field: An Historical Essay’, Leadership Quarterly10(2): 129–144.
33.
Hutchins, E.
and Klausen, T. (1998) ‘Distributed Cognition in an Airline Cockpit’, in Y. Engestrm and T. Middleton (eds) Cognition and Communication at Work, pp. 15–34. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Jaques, E.
(1989) Requisite Organization: The CEO’s Guide to Creative Structure and Leadership. Arlington, VA: Cason Hall.
35.
Jermier, J.
and Kerr, S. (1997) ‘“Substitutes for Leadership: Their Meaning and Measurement”— Contextual Recollections andCurrent Observations’, Leadership Quarterly8(1): 95–101.
36.
Kerr, S.
and Jermier, J. (1978) ‘Substitutes for Leadership: TheirMeaning and Measurement’, Organization and Human Performance22: 374–403.
37.
Lakomski, G.
(1998) ‘Leadership, Distributed Cognition and the Learning Organisation’, in O. Johansson and L. Lindberg (eds) Exploring New Horizons in School Leadership: Conference Proceedings, March 25–27, 1998, pp. 98–111. Ume universitet: Centrum for Skolledarutveckling.
38.
Lakomski, G.
(1999a) ‘Against Leadership: A Concept Without a Cause’, in P. Begley and P. Leonard (eds) The Values of Educational Administration,pp. 36–50. London: Falmer.
39.
Lakomski, G. (1999b) ‘Leadership: Can we Manage Without it?’Inaugural professorial lecture, University of Melbourne, 10 August.
40.
Lakomski, G.
and Evers, C.W. (1999) ‘Values, Socially Distributed Cognition, and Organizational Practice’, in P. Begley (ed.) Valuesand Educational Leadership, pp. 165–181. New York: SUNY Press.
41.
Leont’ev, A.N.
(1978) Activity, Consciousness and Personality, tr. M.J. Hall. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
42.
Leont’ev, A.N.
(1981) Problems of the Development of the Mind.Moscow: Progress Publishers.
43.
Lord, R.G.
and Maher, K.J. (1993) Leadership and Information Processing: Linking Perceptions to Performance. London: Routledge.
44.
Meindl, J.R.
(1995) ‘The Romance of Leadership as a Follower-Centric Theory: A Social Constructionist Approach’, Leadership Quarterly6(3): 329–341.
45.
Miller. E.J.
(1998) ‘The Leader with the Vision: Is Time Running Out?’, in E.B. Klein, F. Gabelnick and P. Herr (eds) The Psychodynamics of Leadership, pp. 3–25. Madison, CT: Psychosocial Press.
46.
Miner, J.B.
(1975) ‘The Uncertain Future of the Leadership Concept: An Overview’, in J.G. Hunt and L.L. Larson (eds) Leadership Frontiers,pp. 197–208. Kent, OH: Kent State University Press.
47.
Mintzberg, H.
(1973) The Nature of Managerial Work.New York: Harper & Row.
48.
Pfeffer, J.
(1977) ‘The Ambiguity of Leadership’, Academy of Management Review2: 104–114.
49.
Robinson, V.M.J.
(forthcoming) ‘Embedding Leadership in Task Performance’, in K.-C. Wong and C. Evers (eds) Leadership for Quality Schooling. London: Falmer.
50.
Sayer, A.
and Walker, R. (1992) The New Social Economy: Reworking theDivision of Labor. London: Blackwell.
51.
Shamir, B.
(1999) ‘Leadership in Boundaryless Organizations: Disposable or Indispensable?’, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology8(1): 49–71.
52.
Star, S.L.
and Strauss, A. (1999) ‘Layers of Silence, Arenas of Voice: The Ecology of Visible and Invisible Work’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work8(1): 9–30.
53.
Strauss, A.
(1985) ‘Work and the Division of Labor’, Sociological Quarterly26(1): 1–19.
54.
Thomas, A.B.
(1993) Controversies in Management. London: Routledge.
55.
Thomas, A.R.
, Willis, Q. and Phillips, D. (1981) ‘Observational Studies of Australian School Administrators: Methodological Issues’, Australian Journal of Education25: 55–72.
56.
Vygotsky, L.S.
(1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, ed. M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner and E. Souberman. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
57.
Weick, K.
(1995) Sensemaking in Organizations.London: Sage.
58.
Weick, K.
and Roberts, K.H. (1993) ‘Collective Mind in Organizations: Heedful Interrelating on Flight Decks’, Administrative ScienceQuarterly38(3); 3577–3581.
59.
Yukl, G.
(1999) ‘An Evaluation of Conceptual Weaknesses in Transformational and Charismatic Leadership Theories’, Leadership Quarterly10(2): 285–305.
