Investigations reveal that exposure to whole-body vibrations can induce degenerative changes in the lumbar spine. The purpose of this study was to assess the health risk on the basis of predicted forces transmitted in the spine. The forces were simulated by means of a biomechanical model, where ten rigid bodies represent the trunk (5), the neck (4), and the head (1) and one additional body imitates the vibrating seat. As stress examples, the model movements were simulated under sinusoidal and shock containing vibrations in the x- and z-direction. In the lumbar spine the resulting shear force was lower than the compressive force. The peak values of the compressive force were −834 N under the sinusoidal and −1188 N under the shock containing vibration. Assessing the health risk, the predicted spine forces have to be compared with the strength of the spine regarding the age and gender of the worker and the dependence on the number of load cycles.
WikströmBOKjellbergALandströmU.Health effects of long-term occupational exposure to whole-body vibration: A review. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics1994; 14: 273–292.
2.
WilderDGPopeMH. Epidemiological and aetiological aspects of low back pain in vibration environments – an update. Clin. Biomech.1996; 11: 61–73.
3.
AnderssonGBJ. Epidemiologic aspects of low back pain in industry.
4.
AnderssonGBJ. Epidemiologic aspects of low back pain in industry. Spine1981; 6: 53–60.
5.
ChaffinDBParkKS. A longitudinal study of low back pain as associated with occupational lifting factors. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J.1973; 34: 513–525.
6.
LuttmannAJägerMSchooKCLaurigWPuhlversE.Wirkung erhöhter Wirbelsäulenbelastung beim Lastentransport auf die Häufigkeit von Rückenbeschwerden. In: LaurigWGerhardLLuttmannAJägerMNauHE eds. Untersuchungen zum Gesundheitsrisiko beim Heben und Umsetzen Lasten. Schriftenreihe der Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz Fb Nr. 409, Dortmund, 1985: 123–180.
7.
JägerMLuttmannA.The load on the lumbar spine during asymmetrical bi-manual materials handling. Ergonomics1992; 35: 783–805.
8.
MertensH.Das dynamische Verhalten des sitzenden Menschen unter Beschleunigungseinfluß. PdD. Thesis, RWTH Aachen, 1976.
9.
LuoZGoldsmithW.Reaction of human head/neck/torso system to shock. J. Biomechanics1991; 24: 499–510.
10.
FritzM.Abschätzung der in der Wirbelsäule bei Ganz-Korper-Schwingungen wirkenden Kräfte mit Hilfe eines biomechanischen Modells. Z. Arb.wiss. 1996; 50(22 NF): 174–179.
11.
FritzM.Estimation of spine forces under whole-body vibration by means of a biomechanical model and transfer functions. Aviat. Space Environ. Med.1997; 68: 512–519.
12.
NiggBMBobbertM.On the potential of various approaches in load analysis to reduce the frequency of sports injuries. J. Biomechanics1990: 23, Suppl. 1: 3–12.
13.
WittenburgJ.Dynamics of systems of rigid bodies. (Leitfaden der angewandten Mathematik und Mechanik, Bd. 33)Teubner, Stuttgart, 1977.
14.
PanjabiMMBrandRAWhiteAA. Three-dimensional flexibility and stiffness properties of the human thoracic spine. J. Biomechanics1976; 9: 185–192.
15.
MarkolfKL. Stiffness and damping characteristics of the thoracolumbar spine. (In: Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, ed. Proceedings of Workshop on Bioengineering Approaches to Problems of the Spine.), California, 1971; 87–143.
16.
KöhneGZerlettGDuntzeH.Ganzkörperschwingungen auf Erdbaumaschinen. (In: Schriftr. “Humanisierung des Arbeitslebens” 32)Düsseldorf: VDI-Verlag, 1982; 1–366.
17.
FritzM.CaiR.1st eine bequeme Sitzhaltung auch gesund? – Eine elektromyographische und biomechanische Untersuchung. Zbl. Arbeitsmed.1985; 35: 144–151.
18.
HinzBSeidelHBräuerDMenzelGBlüthnerRErdmannU.Bidimensional accelerations of lumbar vertebrae and estimation of pilot study. Clin. Biomech.1988; 3: 241–248.
19.
AlthoffIBrinckmannPFrobinWSandoverJBurtonK.Die Bestimmung der Belastung der Wirbelsäule mit Hilfe einer Präzisionsmessung der Körpergröße. (In: Schriftenreihe der Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz, FB 683) Dortmund1993.
20.
HinzBBlüthnerRMenzelGSeidelH.Estimation of disc compression during transient whole-body vibration. Clin. Biomech.1994; 9: 263–271.
21.
FritzM.Abschätzung der Gefährdung der Wirbelsäule durch Ganz-Körper-Schwingungen anhand der mechanischen Übertragungsfunktion des menschlichen Körpers. Ergo-Med1995; 19: 178–184.
22.
NIOSH, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health: Work practices guide for manual lifting. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Cincinnati, Ohio (DHHS (NIOSH) publication, no. 81 - 122) 1981.
23.
BrinckmannPBiggemannMHilwegD.Fatigue fracture of human lumbar vertebrae. Clin. Biomech.1988; Suppl. 2, S1 – S23.
24.
HanssonTHKellerTSSpenglerDM. Mechanical behaviour of the human lumbar spine. II Fatigue strength during dynamic compressive loading. J Orthop Res1987; 5: 479–487.
25.
LaffertyJF. Analytical model of the fatigue characteristics of bone. Aviat. Space. Environ. Med.1978; 49: 170–174.
26.
MichelMCGuoX-DEGibsonLJMcMahonTAHayesWC. Compressive fatigue behavior of bovine trabecular bone. J. Biomechanics1993; 26: 453–463.
27.
HuttonWCCyronBMStottJRR. The compressive strength of lumbar vertebrae. J. Anat.1979; 4: 753–758.
28.
KazarianLGravesGA. Compressive strength characteristics of the human vertebral centrum. Spine1977; 2: 1–14.
29.
SeidelHBlüthnerRHinzBSchustM, Belastung der Lendenwirbelsäule durch stoBhaltige Ganzkörperschwingungen. Schriftenreihe der Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsmedizin, Forschung FB 01 HK 061, Berlin1995.
30.
FairlyTEGriffinMJ. The apparent mass of the seated human body in the fore-and-aft and lateral directions. J. Sound Vib.1990; 139: 299–306.
31.
NicolKRusterbergD.Pressure distribution on mattresses. Biomechanics1993; 26: 1479–1486.
32.
DIN 45 676: Mechanische Eingangsimpedanz und Übertragungsfunktion des menschlichen Körpers (1987).
33.
ISO 2631–1: Mechanical vibration and shock – Guide to the evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration – Part 1: General requirements (1997).
34.
ISO 7962: Mechanical vibration and shock – Mechanical transmissibility of the human body in the z-direction (1987).
