Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The International Standardization Organization and several countries have published standards that provide guidance on evaluation of human response to vibration in buildings, e.g. ISO 2631-2:1989, BS 6472: 1984, and ANSI S3.29: 1983. This paper demonstrates the application of these standards for the case of vibrations induced in residential homes by transit buses. Difficulties and ambiguities in applying the standards are revealed. Several vibration evaluation methods were applied and compared including rms, rmq, peak, and vibration-dose-value methods. Actual vibration levels measured in 6 residential homes were used to assess the various methods. Two evaluation methods were identified as the most appropriate.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Al-Hunaidi

M.O.

, and Guan

(1996). Digital frequency weighting filters for evaluation of human exposure to building vibration. Noise Control Engineering Journal, March-April issue, (in press).

Al-Hunaidi

M.O.

, Rainer

J.H.

, and Pernica

(1994). Measurement and analysis of traffic-induced vibrations. Transport Noise ‘94 – Proceedings of the International Symposium “Transport Noise and Vibration”, St. Petersburg, Russia, Oct. 4-6, 1994, pp. 103-108.

Al-Hunaidi

M.O.

, and Rainer

J.H.

(1990). Evaluation of measurement limits of transducer mountings in the ground. Canadian Acoustics, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 15-27.

ANSI S3.29 (1983). Guide to the evaluation of human exposure to vibration in buildings (American National Standard). Acoustical Society of America, New York, New York.

BS 6472:1984. Evaluation of human exposure to vibration in buildings (1 to 80 Hz). British Standards Institution.

BS 6841:1987. Measurement and evaluation of human exposure to whole-body mechanical vibration and repeated shock. British Standards Institution.

Griffin

M.J.

(1990). Handbook of Human Vibration. Academic Press.

Howarth

H.V.C.

, and Griffin

M.J.

(1990). The relative importance of noise and vibration from railways. Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 21, pp. 129-134.

Howarth

H.V.C.

, and Griffin

M.J.

(1988). Human response to simulated intermittent railway-induced building vibration. Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 120, pp. 413-420.

10.

ISO 2631-1:1985. Evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration – Part 1: General requirements. International Organization for Standardization.

11.

ISO 2631-2:1989. Evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration – Part 2: Continuous vibration and shock-induced vibration in buildings (1 to 80 Hz). International Organization for Standardization.

12.

ISO 8041:1990. Human response to vibration – Measuring instrumentation. International Organization for Standardization.

13.

McKennel

A.C.

(1970). Noise complaints and community action. Transportation Noises: a Symposium on Acceptability Criteria, University of Washington Press, Seattle, Washington, pp. 228-244.

14.

Yamada

, Sueki

, Okamura

, Hagiwara

, Watanabe

, and Kosaka

(1990). Combined effects on man by low frequency noise and vibration. Proceedings Inter-Noise 90, pp. 1311-1314.

Evaluation of Human Response to Building Vibration Caused by Transit Buses

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References