Subjective Assessment of the Vibration Discomfort Produced by Different Hand Held Machines

Abstract

A subjective method of paired comparisons was developed to compare the discomfort caused by the vibration from hand-held power tools with the predictions obtained using the procedures recommended by standards for the evaluation of human exposure to hand-transmitted vibration. Fiteen trained subjects were exposed in the laboratory to seven different vibration exposures produced by five hand-held tools (one of the tools was used in two positions) and an electrodynamic vibrator.

The good agreement observed between and within subjects shows that they can reliably rank vibration dicomfort produced by different hand-held tools. For five vibration exposures out of seven, the rank deduced from the subjective assessments was in accord with the rank of the predicted evaluations derived from the frequency-weighted acceleration values measured. An exposure with highly impulsive vibration was rated as being much more annoying than it was foreseen by the current procedures of evaluation. The operator's position proved to be an important factor in the perception of the discomfort.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

International Standard Organisation (1986) – ISO 5349. Guidelines for the measurement and the assessment of human exposure to hand-transmitted vibration.

Association Française de Normalisation (1986) – AFNOR NF E 90-402. Guide pour l'évaluation de l'exposition des individus à des vibrations transmises par les mains.

Starck

(1984). Characteristics of vibration, hand grip force, and hearing loss in vibration syndrome. Institut of Occupational Health, Helsinky, Finland. Kupion Yliopiston Julkaisuja. Publication of the University of Kupio.

Starck

(1984). High impulse acceleration levels in hand-held vibratory tools. Scand. J. Work. Environ. Health. 10, 171–178.

Schäfer

Dupuis

Hartung

(1984). Acute effects of shock-type vibration transmitted to the hand-arm system. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health, 55, 49–59

Broydé

Bitsch

Donati

(1986). Experimental design to assess the operator's subjective reaction to hand-held vibrating tools. Paper presented at the United Kingdom Informal Group on Human Response to Vibration, session 2, Loughborough, 22–23 September.

Griffin

M.J.

Macfarlane

C.R.

Norman

C.D.

(1982). The transmission of vibration to the hand and the influence of gloves - Vibration effects on the hand and arm in industry. Ed. by Brammer

A.J.

Taylor

, John Wiley & Sons.

Kendall

(1975). Rank correlation methods. Fourth edition Charles Griffin & Co. Ltd., London and High Wycombe.

Miwa

(1967). Evaluation methods for vibration effect. Part 3. Measurements of threshold and equal sensation contours on hand for vertical and horizontal sinusoidal vibration. Industrial Health, Vol. 5, no 3–4.

10.

Reynolds

D.D.

Standlee

K.G.

Angevine

E.N.

(1977). Hand-arm vibration, part iii: Subjective response characteristics of individuals to hand-induced vibration. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 51(2), 267–282.

11.

Gemne

Saraste

(1987). Bone and joint pathology in workers using hand-held vibrating tools. An overview. Scand. Work Environ. Health, 13, 290–300.

12.

Pyykkö

Hyvärinen

Färkkila

(1982). Studies on the etiological mechanism of the vascopastic component of the vibration syndrome. Vibration effects on the hand and arm in industry. Ed. by Brammer

A.J.

Taylor

John Wiley & Sons.

13.

Nishiyama

Watanabe

(1981). Temporary threshold shift of vibratory sensation after clasping a vibrating handle. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health, 49, 21–33.