Abstract
In a continuing study of the annoyance due to low frequency noise, 75 subjects (21 actual complainants and 54 controls) carried out a magnitude estimation task and rated the annoyance due to lower-level low frequency noise. Previous experience with the magnitude estimation task was found to influence subsequent rating behaviour, and a threshold effect (i.e. a steepening of the psychophysical function as threshold was approached) occurred, which was accounted for by the inclusion of a threshold constant, po, in the psychophysical relationship. The results indicated that no significant difference occurred between the actual complainants and a control group when they rated annoyance in the laboratory. The annoyance growth was described by ψ = k(pA−po)0–694, 55 < OASPL (dB) < 75, 20 < FREQUENCY (Hz) < 90 (where ψ = the subjective annoyance, pA = the A-weighted sound pressure in Pa, and k = a constant). However, the complainants seemed more predisposed to complain or express dissatisfaction and were more likely to rate a given noise as unacceptable. Furthermore, they were more likely to do so for stimuli within the 30–50 Hz frequency range.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
