In a study of the annoyance due to low frequency noise, 75 subjects (consisting of 21 complainants and 54 controls) carried out a magnitude estimation task and rated the annoyance due to lower-level low frequency noise (55dB–75dB). After allowing for a threshold effect, it was found that the E-weighted sound pressure level was, in general, the best predictor of lower-level low frequency noise annoyance. However, it was not a significantly better predictor than any of the other nine noise measures considered. The widely available dB(A) noise measure was therefore suggested as a useful predictor of group annoyance due to lower-level low frequency noise.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BryanM.E.TempestW. (1972) New Scientist53, 584–586. Does Infrasound make drivers drunk?.
2.
MullinS. (1972) New Scientist53, 709. Infrasound's Effects.
3.
BirneyJ.G. (1972) New Scientist54, 101. Infrasound.
4.
Anon. (1973) (September) Noise and Vibration Bulletin239. Supermarket.
5.
Anon. (1973) (March) Noise and Vibration Bulletin84. The infrasonic bus.
6.
Anon. (1973) (November) Noise and Vibration Bulletin286. Oil-fired boiler.
7.
BruelP.V.OlesonH.P. (1973) Bruel and Kjaer Technical ReviewNo.3, 14–25. Infrasonic measurements.
8.
Anon. (1976) (October) Noise and Vibration Bulletin269–270. Hum.
9.
Anon. (1977) (April) Noise and Vibration Bulletin98–99. Mystery noise.
10.
Anon. (1977) (19 June) The Sunday Mirror. Have you heard the hum?.
11.
Anon. (1977) (26 June) The Sunday Mirror. Hounded by this nagging noise.
12.
Anon. (1977) (3 July) The Sunday Mirror. Hum – that mystery noise drives sobbing wife out of the house.
13.
ScottR. (1978) (September) Noise and Vibration Bulletin, 266–268. Annoyance caused by Low Frequency Sound.
14.
BronerN. (1978) Journal of Sound and Vibration58(4), 483–500. The Effects of Low Frequency Noise on People – A Review.
15.
HoodR.A.LeventhallH.G. (1971) Acustica25, 10–13. Field Measurement of Infrasonic Noise.
16.
TempestW.Acustica29, 205–209. Loudness and annoyance due to Low Frequency Noise.
17.
BryanM.E. (1976) Infrasound and Low Frequency Vibration (TempestW., ed) 65–96. Low Frequency Annoyance. London: Academic Press.
18.
LeventhallH.G.KyriakidesK. (1976) Infrasound and Low Frequency Vibration. (TempestW., ed) 1–18. Environmental Infrasound: Its Occurrence and Measurement. London:Academic Press.
19.
BronerN. (1978) Applied Acoustics11, 129–146. Low Frequency and Infrasonic Noise in Transportation.
20.
BryanM.E. (1971) Proceedings of the Autumn Meeting of the British Acoustical Society, November 71–109. Annoyance effects due to low frequency sound.
21.
VasudevanR.N.GordonC.G. (1977) Applied Acoustics10, 57–69. Experimental study of annoyance due to low frequency environmental noise.
22.
BronerN.LeventhallH.G. (1978) Acoustics Letters2, 16–21. Low frequency noise annoyance and the dB(A).
23.
BronerN.LeventhallH.G. (1980) Journal of Sound and Vibration73(2), 271–277. A modified PNdB for assessment of low frequency noise.
24.
StevensS.S. (1956) Am Journal of Psychology69(1), 1–25. The Direct Estimation of Sensory Magnitudes – Loudness.
25.
StevensS.S. (1972) Journal of the Acoustical Society of America51(2.2), 575–601. Perceived Level of noise by Mark VII and Decibels (E).
26.
HigginsT.H. (1976) U.S. D.O.T. F.A.A. Report No. FAA-RD-76-1, Nov. Human Response to Sound: The Calculation of Perceived Level, PLdB (noisiness or loudness) directly from physical measures.
27.
ISO (1970), R.507. Procedure for describing aircraft noise around an airport.
28.
WalfordR.E. (1978) Diploma of Chelsea College, University of London. Acoustical aspects of some hum complainants.
29.
MarksL.E.StevensJ.C. (1968) Perception and Psychophysics4(5), 315–318. The Form of the Psychophysical Function Near Threshold.
30.
ISO (1971), R.1996. Assessment of noise with respect to community response.
