The Effect of Auditory Processing on the Development of Low Level Low Frequency Noise Criteria

Abstract

The role played by loudness in the assessment of annoyance is seen to effect an intensity dominated concept current in noise assessment practices. Such dominance is not supported by the complex processing nature of the auditory system.

The individual is placed within a context which requires the auditory system to align the person to external stimuli whilst maintaining the production of appropriate behaviours. Development of the concepts associated with audition is a pre-requisite to establishing viable noise assessment criteria. The limitations of present day criteria, with an accepted assumption of intensity as the key parameter, are accentuated when assessments are made of low level low frequency noise. Once the individual is viewed as an active processor, bodily parameters may also serve to provide indices which are derived from the amount of ‘processor work’.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Benton

(1982). Problems in the assessment of low level low frequency noise. Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics: Spring Conference, University of Surrey.

Borredon

(1980). Physiological effects of infra sound in our everyday environment. Proceedings of the conference on low frequency noise and hearing. Aalborg, Denmark.

Cherry

(1953). Some experiments on the reception of speech with one and with two ears. J.A.S.A., 25, 945–949.

Cohen

M.F.

Schubert

L.P.

(1979). Microstructure of the detection threshold curve. Presented to meeting of Acoust. Soc. Am.

Cardozo

B.L.

Van Lieshout

J.M.

(1981). Estimates of annoyance of sounds of different character. Applied Acoustics, 14, 323–329.

Egen

. (1954). Some factors affecting multichannel listening. J.A.S.A., 26, 774–782.

Elliot

(1958). Ripple effect in the audiogram. Nature, 181, 1076.

Frost

G.P.

(1980). An investigation into the microstructure of the auditory threshold between 1 and 2 kHz. M.Sc. dissertation. Chelsea College, University of London.

Hopkinson

R.G.

Hawkes

R.J.

(1978). Adaptation of Distracting Stimuli in the Urban Environment: A Laboratory Study, Final Report to SSRC on research project HR 859 University College London.

10.

Howarth

Ellis

(1961). The relative intelligibility threshold for one's own and other people's homes. Quart. J. Exp. Psychol., 13, 236–240.

11.

Johnson

(1980). The effects of high level infrasound. Proceedings of the conference on low frequency noise and hearing. Aalbo*g, Denmark.

12.

Kemp

D.T.

Chum

(1980). Properties of the Generator of Stimulated Acoustic Emissions, Hearing Research 2, 213–232.

13.

Kerrich

. (1969). Multiple Ratings of Sound Stimuli. J.A.S.A., 45, 1014–1017.

14.

Kryter

K.D.

(1970). The effects of Noise on Man, Academic Press.

15.

Leventhall

H.G.

(1980). Annoyance caused by low frequency low level noise. Proceedings of the conference on low frequency noise and hearing. Aalborg, Denmark.

16.

Moray

(1970). Listening and Attention, Penguin Science of Behaviour.

17.

Oswald

. (1964). Discriminative responses to stimulation during Human Sleep, Brain, 83, 440–453.

18.

Plotkin

Odling-Smee . (1979). The role of learning in the modification of Behaviour. Advances in Behavioural Studies.

19.

Reese

. (1944). The relative annoyance produced for various bands of noise. P.B. 270–307 Psycho. Acoust. Lab. Harvard University.

20.

Stevens

S.S.

(1936). A scale for the measurement of a psychological magnitude: Loudness. Psych. Review, 43, 405–416.

21.

Tokita

(1980). Low frequency noise pollution problems in Japan. Proceedings of the conference on low frequency noise and hearing, Aalborg, Denmark.

22.

Treisman

(1964). Selective Attention in Man. British Medical Bulletin, Vol.20, pp. 12–16.

23.

Warren

R.M.

(1970). Perceptual restoration of missing speech sounds. Science, N.Y. 167,392–393.