This study examines the effects of powerful versus powerless speech styles on employment interview outcomes, extending and refining research by Wiley and Eskilson. Undergraduate and professional respondents listened to one of eight audiotaped interviews manipulated by speech style, interviewer gender, and interviewee gender and evaluated the interviewees’ dynamism, social attractiveness, competence, and employability on Likert-type scales. Results indicate that a powerful speech style results in positive attributions of competence and employability and that professional respondents evaluated the speech styles differently than did undergraduates. Implications for the employment interview are discussed, and directions for future research are also identified.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adler, R.
(1992). Communicating at work (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
2.
Adler, S.
(1987). Bidialectalism? Mandatory or elective?Asha, 29, 41-42.
3.
Arvey, R. D.
, & Campion, J. E. (1982). The employment interview: A summary and review of recent research. Personnel Psychology, 35, 281-322.
4.
Arvey, R. D.
, Miller, H. W., Gould, R., & Burch, P. (1987). Interview validity for selecting sales clerks. Personnel Psychology, 40, 1-12.
5.
Atkins, C. P.
(1993). Do employment recruiters discriminate on the basis of nonstandard dialect?Journal of Employment Counseling, 30, 108-118.
6.
Baron, R. A.
(1987). Interviewer’s moods and reaction to job applicants: The influence of affective states on applied social judgments. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17, 911-926.
7.
Baron, R. A.
(1993). Interviewers’ moods and evaluations of job applicants: The role of applicant qualifications. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 253-271.
8.
Barr, S. H.
, & Hitt, M. A. (1986). A comparison of selection decision models in manager versus student samples. Personnel Psychology, 39, 599-617.
9.
Bradac, J. J.
, Hemphill, M., & Tardy, C. (1981). Effects of “powerful” & “powerless” speech upon judgments of victims and villains. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 45, 327-341.
10.
Bradac, J. J.
, Konsky, C. W., & Elliott, N. D. (1976). Verbal behavior of interviewees: The effects of several situational variables on verbal productivity, disfluency, and lexical diversity. Journal of Communication Disorders, 9, 211-225.
11.
Bradac, J. J.
, & Mulac, A. (1984). A molecular view of powerful and powerless speech styles: Attributional consequences of specific language features and communicator intentions. Communication Monographs, 51, 307-319.
12.
Bradac, J. J.
, Mulac, A., & Thompson, S. A. (1995). Men’s and women’s use of intensifiers and hedges in problem-solving interaction: Molar and molecular analyses. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28, 93-116.
13.
Bradac, J. J.
, & Street, R. (1990). Powerful and powerless styles of talk: A theoretical analysis of language and impression formation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 23, 195-242.
14.
Buckely, M. R.
, & Eder, R. W. (1988). B. M. Springbett and the notion of the “snap decision” in the interview. Journal of Management, 14, 59-69.
15.
Campion, M. A.
, & Campion, J. E. (1987). Evaluation of an interview skills training program in a natural field experiment. Personnel Psychology, 40, 675-691.
16.
Campion, M. A.
, Pursell, E. D., & Brown, B. K. (1988). Structured interviewing: Raising the psychometric properties of the employment interview. Personnel Psychology, 41, 25-42.
17.
Carli, L. L.
(1990). Gender, language, and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 941-951.
18.
DeVellis, R. F.
(1991). Scale development: Theory and applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19.
Dipboye, R. L.
(1982). Self-fulfilling prophecy in the selection-recruitment interview. Academy of Management Review, 7, 579-586.
20.
Dipboye, R. L.
, Fontenelle, G. A., & Garner, K. (1984). Effects of previewing the application on interview process and outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 118-128.
21.
Dougherty, T. W.
, Ebert, R. J., & Callender, J. C. (1986). Policy capturing in the employment interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 9-15.
22.
Dreher, G. F.
, Ash, R. A., & Hancock, P. (1988). The role of traditional research design in underestimating the validity of the employment interview. Personnel Psychology, 43, 315-327.
23.
Einhorn, L. J.
(1981). An inner view of the job interview: An investigation of successful communicative behaviors. Communication Education, 30, 217-228.
24.
Erickson, B.
, Lind, A. E., Johnson, B. C., & O’Barr, W. M. (1978). Speech style and impression formation in a court setting: The effects of “powerful” and “powerless” speech. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 266-279.
25.
Fay, C. H.
, & Latham, G. P. (1982). Effects of training and rating scales on rating errors. Personnel Psychology, 35, 106-116.
26.
Forsythe, S.
, Drake, M. F., & Cox, C. E. (1985). Influence of applicant’s dress on interviewer’s selection decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 374-378.
27.
Gibbons, P.
, Busch, J., & Bradac, J. (1991). Powerful versus powerless language: Consequences for persuasion, impression formation, and cognitive response. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 10, 115-133.
28.
Gilmore, D.
, Beehr, T., & Love, K. (1986). Effects of applicant sex, applicant physical social attractiveness, type of rater and type of job on interview decisions. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 59, 103-109.
29.
Gordon, M. E.
, Slade, L. A., & Schmitt, N. (1986). The “science of the sophomore” revisited: From conjecture to empiricism. Academy of Management Review, 11, 191-202.
30.
Graves, L. M.
, & Powell, G. N. (1988). An investigation of sex discrimination in recruiters’ evaluations of actual applicants. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 20-29.
31.
Hall, J. L.
, & Frederickson, W. A. (1979). Sex-role stereotyping, a function of age and education as measured by a perceptual-projective device. Sex Roles, 5, 77-84.
32.
Harris, M. M.
(1989). Reconsidering the employment interview: A review of recent literature and suggestions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 42, 691-726.
33.
Hopper, R.
, & Williams, F. (1973). Speech characteristics and employability. Speech Monographs, 40, 296-302.
34.
Hosman, L. A.
(1989). The evaluative consequences of hedges, hesitations, and intensifiers: Powerful and powerless speech styles. Human Communication Research, 15, 383-406.
35.
Hosman, L. A.
, & Siltanen, S. A. (1994). The attribution and evaluative consequences of powerful and powerless speech styles: An examination of the “control over others” and “control of self” explanations. Language & Communication, 14, 287-298.
36.
Hosman, L. A.
, & Wright, J. W. II. (1987). The effects of hedges and hesitations in impression formation in a simulated courtroom context. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 51, 173-188.
37.
Huffcutt, A. I.
, & Arthur, W., Jr. (1994). Hunter and Hunter (1984) revisited: Interview validity for entry-level jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2, 184-190.
38.
Janz, T.
(1989). The patterned behavior description interview: The best prophet of the future is the past. In R. W. Eder & G. R. Ferris (Eds.), The employment interview: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 158-168). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
39.
Johnson, C.
, & Vinson, L. (1987). “Damned if you do, damned if you don’t?” Status, powerful speech, and evaluations of female witnesses. Women’s Studies in Communication, 10, 37-44.
40.
Kacmar, K.
, Delery, J., & Ferris, G. (1992). Differential effectiveness of applicant impression management tactics on employment interview decisions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1250-1272.
41.
Kinicki, A. J.
, & Lockwood, C. A. (1985). The interview process: An examination of factors recruiters use in evaluating job applicants. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 26, 117-125.
42.
Lin, T.
, Dobbins, G. H., & Farh, J. (1992). A field study of race and age similarity effects on interview ratings in conventional and situational interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 363-371.
43.
Macan, T. H.
, & Dipboye, R. L. (1994). The effects of the application on processing of information from the employment interview. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1291-1314.
44.
Maurer, S. D.
, & Fay, C. (1988). Effect of situational interviews, conventional structured interviews, and training on interview rating agreement: An experimental analysis. Personnel Psychology, 41, 329-344.
45.
McCroskey, J. C.
, & Mehrely, R. S. (1969). The effects of disorganization and nonfluency on attitude change and source credibility. Speech Monographs, 36, 13-21.
46.
McMullen, L. M.
, & Pasloski, D. D. (1992). Effects of communication apprehension, familiarity of partner, and topic on selected “woman’s language” features. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 21, 17-30.
47.
Mulac, A.
, & Bradac, J. (1995). Women’s style in problem-solving interactions: Powerless or simply feminine? In P. J. Kalbfleisch & M. J. Cody (Eds.), Gender, power, and com munication in human relationships (pp. 83-104). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
48.
Parson, C. K.
, & Liden, R. C. (1984). Interviewer perceptions of applicant qualifications: A multivariate field study of demographic characteristics and nonverbal cues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 557-568.
49.
Ralston, S. M.
, Redmond, M. V., & Pickett, T. A. (1993). An exploratory study of recruiters’ self-ratings of interpersonal communication and applicants’ decisions about employment. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 77, 135-142.
50.
Rasmussen, K. G.
(1984). Nonverbal behavior, verbal behavior, résumé credentials, and selection interview outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 551-556.
51.
Slevin, K. E.
, & Wingrove, C. R. (1983). Similarities and differences among three generations of women in attitudes toward the female role in contemporary society. Sex Roles, 9, 609-624.
52.
Ugbah, S. D.
, & Evuleocha, S. U. (1992). The importance of written, verbal, and nonverbal communication factors in employment interview decisions. Journal of Employment Counseling, 29, 128-137.
53.
White, C. S.
(1986). Role-played relationships between assertiveness and mock interviewing success. Psychological Reports, 59, 563-569.
54.
Wiley, M. G.
, & Eskilson, A. (1985). Speech style, gender stereotypes, and corporate success: What if women talk more like men?Sex Roles, 12, 993-1007.
55.
Wright, J. W., Jr.
, & Hosman, L. A. (1983). Language style and sex bias in the courtroom: The effects of male and female use of hedges and intensifiers on impression formation. Southern Speech Communication Journal, 48, 137-152.
56.
Zahn, C. J.
, & Hopper, R. (1985). Measuring language attitudes: The speech evaluation instrument. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 4, 113-123.
57.
Zedeck, S.
, Tziner, A., & Middlestadt, S. E. (1983). Interviewer validity and reliability: Individual analysis approach. Personnel Psychology, 36, 355-370.
