After surviving military rule for a decade under General Zia ul-Haq, Pakistan again transitioned to democracy in 1988 by holding four relatively free and fair elections, along with several rounds of peaceful power transfers. However, this steady progress of democratisation was cut short by a semi-system actor, the military, which often displays tendencies to intervene in the country’s political system. Using an actor-model of democratisation, this article contends that the military seized power because not enough political pressure was exerted by the weak system actors, which included country’s two largest political parties—Pakistan People’s Party and Pakistan Muslim League (N). Besides this, the actor-model perspective reveals that disunity, party factionalism, weak-intra-party democracy, governmental instability and corruption were responsible for offering the least resistance by the system actors. Furthermore, the article argues that the Muhajirs Quami Movement Party, the anti-system actor, did not have any impactful causal role in the country’s democratic breakdown.
AhmarM. (1996) ‘Ethnicity and State Power in Pakistan: The Karachi Crisis’, Asian Survey, 36: 1031–104.
2.
AlmondG.A. & VerbaS. (1963) The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Chicago, IL: Princeton University Press.
3.
AzharM.M., KhanA.B. & BukhariM.H. (2019) ‘A Comparative Analysis of Intra-party Democracy Within the Major Political Parties of Pakistan, India, and Bangladesh’, Review of Economics and Development Studies, 5(1): 355–64.
4.
BelokrenitskyV.Y. & MoskalenkoV.N. (2013) A Political History of Pakistan, 1947–2007. Karachi: Oxford University Press.
5.
BermanS. (1997) ‘Civil Society and the Collapse of the Weimar Republic’, World Politics, 49(3): 401–29.
6.
BermeoN. (2016) ‘On Democratic Backsliding’, Journal of Democracy, 27(1): 5–19.
7.
BoixC. & StokesS.C. (2003) ‘Endogenous Democratization’, World Politics, 55(4): 517–49.
8.
BurkiS.J. (1999) Pakistan: Fifty Years of Nationhood. 3rd ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
9.
CapocciaG. (2005) Defending Democracy: Reactions to Extremism in Interwar Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
ChaddaM. (2000) Building Democracy in South Asia: India, Nepal and Pakistan. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
12.
ChibaD., MartinL.W. & StevensonR.T. (2015) ‘A Copula Approach to the Problem of Selection Bias in Models of Government Survival’, Political Analysis, 23(1): 42–58.
13.
ChoudhuryG.W. (1969) Constitutional Development in Pakistan. London: Longman.
14.
DiamondL. (2015) ‘Facing Up to the Democratic Recession’, Journal of Democracy, 26(1): 141–55.
15.
DiamondL., HartlynJ., LinzJ.J. & LipsetS.M. (1999). Democracy in Developing Countries: Latin America. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
16.
DiskinA., DiskinH., & HazanR.Y. (2005) ‘Why Democracies Collapse: The Reasons for Democratic Failure and Success’, International Political Science Review, 26(3): 291–309.
17.
EncarnaciónO. (2006) ‘Civil Society and Democracy in Latin America’, Foreign Affairs, 85(5): 172–172.
18.
FortunatoD. & LoftisM.W. (2018) ‘Cabinet Durability and Fiscal Discipline’, American Political Science Review, 112(4): 939–53.
19.
FukuyamaF. (2001) ‘Social Capital, Civil Society and Development’, Third World Quarterly, 22(1): 7–20.
20.
FukuyamaF. (2012) ‘The Future of History: Can Liberal Democracy Survive the Decline of the Middle Class?’, Foreign Affairs, 9(1): 53–61.
21.
GoodsonL.P. (2008) ‘Pakistan After Musharraf: The 2008 Elections’, Journal of Democracy, 19(4): 5–15.
22.
GuntherR., DiamandourosP.N. & PuhleH.J. (1995) The Politics of Democratic Consolidation: Southern Europe in Comparative Perspective. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
23.
HossainI. (2000) ‘Pakistan’s October 1999 Military Coup: Its Causes and Consequences’, Asian Journal of Political Science, 8(2): 35–58.
24.
HowardM.M. (2002) ‘The Weakness of Post-communist Civil Society’, Journal of Democracy, 13(1): 157–69.
25.
HuberJ.D. (1998) ‘How Does Cabinet Instability Affect Political Performance? Portfolio Volatility and Health Care Cost Containment in Parliamentary Democracies’, The American Political Science Review, 92(3): 577–591.
26.
HuntingtonS.P. (1993) The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
27.
IgnaziP. (2020). ‘The Four Knights of Intra-party Democracy: A Rescue for Party Delegitimation’,Party Politics, 26(1): 9–20.
28.
InglehartR. & WelzelC. (2005) Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
JaffrelotC. (2015) The Pakistan Paradox: Instability and Resilience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
JalalA. (1999) ‘Pakistan’s Tangle: The Politics of Conflicting Security and Economic Interests. Government and Opposition, 34(1): 78–93.
31.
JalalA. (2024) ‘Does Democracy Have a Future in Pakistan?’, Journal of Democracy, 5(1): 30–42.
32.
JonesP. (2003) The Pakistan’s People Party Rise to Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33.
KhanF. (2007) ‘Corruption and the Decline of the State in Pakistan’, Asian Journal of Political Science, 15(2): 219–47.
34.
KochanekS. A. (2010) ‘Corruption and the Criminalization of Politics in South Asia’. In BrassP.R. (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of South Asian Politics: India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Nepal (pp. 364–81). USA: Routledge.
35.
LepsiusM.R. (1978) ‘From Fragmented Party Democracy to Government by Emergency Decree and National Socialist takeover: Germany’. In LinzJ.J. & StephanA. (Eds) The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes: Europe (pp. 34–79). Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
36.
LevitskyS. & ZiblattD. (2018). How Democracies Die: What History Reveals About Our Future. London: Penguin.
37.
LinzJ. J., & StepanA. (1978) The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
38.
LinzJ. J., & StepanA. (1996) Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-communist Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
39.
LipsetS.M. (1959) ‘Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy’, American Political Science Review, 53(1): 69–105.
40.
MagoneJ.M. (1995) ‘Party Factionalism in New Small Southern European Democracies: Some Comparative Findings from the Portuguese and Greek, Experiences (1974–82)’, Democratization, 2(1): 90–101.
41.
MainwaringS. & Pérez-LiñánA. (2013a) Democracies and Dictatorships in Latin America: Emergence, Survival, and Fall. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
MainwaringS. & Pérez-LiñánA. (2013b) ‘Lessons from Latin America: Democratic Breakdown and Survival’, Journal of Democracy, 24(2): 123–37.
43.
MuftiM. (2015) ‘The Years of a Failed Democratic Transition, 1988–1999’. In LongR.D. (Ed.), A History of Pakistan (pp. 633–78). Karachi: Oxford University Press.
44.
NasrV. (2005) ‘The Rise of Muslim Democracy’, Journal of Democracy, 16(2): 13–27.
45.
New York Times (1992, November27) ‘Bhutto Drawing Thousands in Rail Campaign to Oust Government’. (Consulted 22June2024), from https://www.nytimes.com/1992/11/27/world/bhutto-drawing-thousands-in-rail-campaign-to-oust-government.html.
46.
New York Times (1999, April16) ‘Pakistan Sentences Bhutto to 5 years for Corruption’. (Consulted 22April2024), from https://www.nytimes.com/1999/04/16/world/pakistan-sentences-bhutto-to-5-years-for-corruption.html.
47.
O’DonnellG.A. (1988). Bureaucratic Authoritarianism: Argentina, 1966–1973, in Comparative Perspective. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
48.
O’DonnellG.A. (1992) ‘Traditions, Continuities, and Paradoxes’. In MainwaringS., O’DonnellG. & ValenzuelaJ. S. (Eds.), Issues in Democratic Consolidation: The New South American Democracies in Comparative Perspective (pp. 17–56). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
49.
Pakistan Muslim League (Nawaz). (2002) ‘Constitution of Pakistan Muslim League’. URL (consulted 22June2024), from Constitution of PML(N) | Sardar Mehtab Ahmed Khan (wordpress.com).
50.
Pakistan People’s Party. (2022). History of Pakistan People’s Party. URL (consulted 22June2024), from History: Pakistan Peoples Party (ppp.org.pk).
51.
PowellG.B. (1981) ‘Party Systems and Political System Performance: Voting Participation, Government Stability and Mass Violence in Contemporary Democracies’, The American Political Science Review, 75(4): 861–79.
52.
PrzeworskiA., AlvarezM., CheibubJ.A., & LimongiF. (1996) ‘What Makes Democracies Endure?’Journal of Democracy, 7(1): 39–55.
53.
PrzeworskiA., AlvarezM., CheibubJ.A., & LimongiF. (2000) Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54.
PutnamR.D. (1993) Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
55.
RahatG. & ShapiraA. (2017) ‘An Intra-party Democracy Index: Theory, Design and a Demonstration’, Parliamentary Affairs, 70(1): 84–110.
56.
RaisR.A. (2016) ‘Social Drivers of Democratic Change’. In AhmadI. & RafiqA. (Eds.), Pakistan’s Democratic Transition: Change and Persistence (pp. 95–109). London: Routledge.
57.
RanjanA. (2017) ‘Public Interest and Private Gain in Pakistan: Managing the State Despite Predictions of Failure’, South Asia Research, 37(3): 296–314.
58.
RiazA. (2020) ‘The Pathway of Democratic Backsliding in Bangladesh’, Democratization, 28(1): 179–97.
59.
RizviH. (2000) Military, State and Society in Pakistan. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
60.
RosenblumN. (2008) On the Side of Angels. Chicago, IL: Princeton University Press.
61.
SartoriG. (1976) Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62.
SattarA. & BaigR. (2001) ‘Civil Society in Pakistan: A Preliminary Report on the CIVICUS Index on Civil Society’. Occasional Paper Series, 1 (11).
63.
ScarrowS.E. (2005) Political Parties and Democracy in Theoretical and Practical Perspectives. Implementing Intra-Party Democracy. Washington, DC: National Institute for International Affairs. URL (consulted 1April2025), from https://www.ndi.org/sites/default/files/1951_polpart_scarrow_110105_5.pdf
64.
SchattschneiderE.E. (1942) Party Government. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
65.
SchmitterP.C. (2017) ‘The Role of Elites in Democratization’, Journal of Chinese Political Science, 23(1): 33–46.
66.
SeligsonM.A. (2000) ‘Toward a Model of Democratic Stability: Political Culture in Central America’, Estudios interdisciplinarios de América Latina y el Caribe, 11(2): 5–29.
67.
ShafqatS. (1996) ‘Pakistan Under Benazir Bhutto’, Asian Survey, 36(7): 655–672.
68.
ShafqatS. (1997) Civil–Military Relations in Pakistan: From Zulfikar Ali Bhutto to Benazir Bhutto. New York: Routledge.
69.
ShafqatS. (2020). ‘The Formation, Development and Decay of the Pakistan Muslim League’. In MuftiM., ShafqatS. & SiddiquiN. (Eds.), Pakistan’s Political Parties: Surviving Between Dictatorship and Democracy (pp. 23–40). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
70.
ShahA. (2004). ‘Civil Society in the Service of an Authoritarian State’. In AlagappaM. (Ed.), Civil Society and Political Change in Asia: Expanding and Contracting Democratic Space (pp. 357–88). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
71.
ShahA. (2014) The Army and Democracy: Military Politics in Pakistan. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
72.
ShahA. (2019) ‘Pakistan: Voting Under Military Tutelage’, Journal of Democracy, 30(1): 128–42.
73.
ShahA.A. & ZakoriA. (2020) The Primacy of Political Parties in the Democratic System of Pakistan and the Role of Pakistan People’s Party. Mauritius: LAP (LAMBERT Academic Publishing).
74.
ShahM.A. (1998) ‘The Emergence of the Muhajir Quami Movement (MQM) in Pakistan and its Implications for Regional Security’, The Round Table: The Commonwealth Journal of International Affairs, 87(348): 505–19.
75.
SmithA. (2003) ‘Election Timing in Majoritarian Parliaments’, British Journal of Political Science, 33(3): 397–418.
TocquevilleA. (2002) Democracy in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
82.
TudorM. (2016) ‘Enduring Challenges to Democracy’. In AhmadI. & RafiqA. (Eds.), Pakistan’s Democratic Transition: Change and Persistence (pp. 39–52). London: Routledge.
83.
TudorM. & SlaterD (2016) ‘The Content of Democracy: Nationalist Parties and Inclusive Ideologies in India and Indonesia.’ In BermeoN. & YasharD. (Eds.), Parties, Democracy and Movements in the Developing World (pp. 2–60). New York: Cambridge University Press.
84.
UllahM.F. (2018, March18) ‘“Democracy Begins at Home”: Intra-party Elections in Pakistan’. Data Stories. URL (consulted 3August2024), from https://www.datastories.pk/democracy-begins-home-intra-party-elections-pakistan/
85.
von dem BergeB. & PoguntkeT. (2017) ‘Varieties of Intra-party Democracy: Conceptualization and Index Construction’. In ScarrowS., WebbP. & PoguntkeT. (Eds.), Organizing Political Parties: Representation, Participation and Power (pp. 136–157). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
86.
WaldnerD., & LustE. (2018) ‘Unwelcome Change: Coming to Terms with Democratic Backsliding’, Annual Review of Political Science, 21: 93–113.
87.
WayL. (2014) ‘Civil Society and Democratization’, Journal of Democracy, 25(3): 35–43.
88.
WinichakulT. (2008) ‘Toppling Democracy’, Journal of Contemporary Asia, 38(1): 11–37.
89.
ZaidiS.A. (2002) ‘Politics of Opportunism’, Economic & Political Weekly, 37(44–5): 4539–40.
90.
ZariskiR. (1960) ‘Party Factions and Comparative Politics: Some Preliminary Observations’, Midwest Journal of Political Science, 4(1): 27–51.
91.
ZiringL. (2003) Pakistan: At the Crosscurrent of History. Oxford: Oneworld Publications.
