Post-independence Indian science as a medium of national development offers an opportunity to engage with the West beyond the straightjacket of domination and subordination. This ambivalence is reflected in the conception and materialisation of Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs), established under the guidance of Western powers to strengthen India’s technological progress. Being delivered from the West, IITs created conditions of sameness and difference, leading to a situation where the West and India transformed each other, with major implications for ideas of development and nationhood. This article focuses on IITs, particularly IIT Kanpur, as a site of collaboration and contestation, where engineering and politics often crossed, negotiated and resisted each other. This also led to situations where science’s materialisation through machines, such as computers, blurred the experiential difference between the West and India. Such boundary crossings created new scientific subjectivities that traversed beyond the nation and de-territorialised the practice of science.
AbrahamI. (1997) ‘Science and Secrecy in Making of Postcolonial State’, Economic & Political Weekly, 32(33/34): 2136–46.
2.
AhmadA. (1968) ‘Science as a Management Problem’, Economic & Political Weekly, 3(31): 1214–17.
3.
AlvaresC. (1988) ‘Science, Colonialism and Violence: A Luddite View’. In NandyA. (Ed), Science, Hegemony and Violence: A Requiem for Modernity (pp. 31–45). New Delhi: United Nations University.
4.
AndersonW. (2002) ‘Introduction: Postcolonial Technoscience’, Social Studies of Science, 32(5/6): 643–58.
5.
ArnoldD. (2013) Everyday Technology: Machines and the Making of India’s Modernity. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
6.
BassettR. (2009) ‘Aligning India in the Cold War Era: Indian Technical Elites, the Indian Institute of Technology at Kanpur, and Computing in India and the United States’, Technology and Culture, 50(4): 783–810.
7.
BassettR. (2016) The Technological Indian. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
BhabhaH.K. (1994) ‘Of Mimicry and Man: The Ambivalence of Colonial Discourse’. In BhabhaH.K. (Ed), The Location of Culture (pp. 85–92). London: Routledge.
9.
BhabhaH.K. (2006) ‘Signs Taken for Wonders’. In AshcroftB., GriffithsG. & TiffinH. (Eds), The Post-Colonial Studies Reader (pp. 38–43). New York: Routledge.
10.
ChakrabartyD. (2000) Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
11.
ChakrabartyD. (2011) ‘The Muddle of Modernity’, The American Historical Review, 116(3): 663–75.
12.
DahlN.C. (1972) ‘The Collaborative Program at IIT/Kanpur’. In Kanpur Indo-American Program: Final Report (1962–1972) (pp. 1–32). Cambridge, MA: Education Development Center.
13.
FeenbergA. (2003) ‘Democratic Rationalization: Technology, Power, and Freedom’. In ScharffR.C. & DusekV. (Eds), Philosophy of Technology (pp. 652–65). Malden: Blackwell.
14.
FeyerabendP. (1987) Farewell to Reason. London: Verso.
15.
GautamV. (2013) IIT Delhi: A Longitudinal Perspective. New Delhi: Macmillan.
HalfmanR.L. (1972) ‘The Development of the Educational Program at IIT/Kanpur’. In Kanpur Indo-American Program: Final Report (1962–1972) (pp. 33–66). Cambridge, MA: Education Development Center.
18.
HardingS. (1998) Is Science Multicultural? Postcolonialisms, Feminisms, and Epistemologies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
19.
HindD. (2008) The Threat to Reason. London: Verso.
20.
KakodkarA. (2011, April) Taking IITs to Excellence and Greater Relevance. Report of Dr Anil Kakodkar Committee. URL (consulted 12December2021), from http://14.139.60.153/bitstream/123456789/1287/1/HIGHER%20EDUCATION-KakodkarCommitteeReport.pdf
21.
KargonR. & LeslieS. (1996) ‘Translating American Models of the Technical University to India and South Korea’. In BarrereM. (Ed), 20th Century Sciences: Beyond the Metropolis. Vol. 5 (pp. 153–66). Paris: Orstom Editions.
22.
KingA.D. (1970) ‘Elite Education and the Economy: IIT Entrance, 1965–70’, Economic & Political Weekly, 5(35): 1463–72.
23.
LeslieS.W. & KargonR. (2006) ‘Exporting MIT: Science, Technology, and Nation-Building in India and Iran’, Osiris, 21(1): 110–30.
24.
LushabaL.S. (2006) Development as Modernity, Modernity as Development. African Studies Centre Working Paper 69. Leiden: African Studies Centre.
25.
MahalanobisP.C. (1963) ‘Recent Developments in the Organization of Science in India’, Sankhya: The Indian Journal of Statistics, 25(1–2): 67–84.
26.
ManchandaR. (2008) Monastery, Sanctuary, Laboratory: 50 Years of IIT Bombay. New Delhi: Macmillan.
27.
McDermottJ. (2003) ‘Technology: The Opiate of the Intellectuals’. In ScharffR.C. & DusekV. (Eds), Philosophy of Technology (pp. 638–51). Malden: Blackwell.
28.
MehrotraS.P. & SahP.P. (2015) The Fourth IIT: The Saga of IIT Kanpur (1960–2010). Gurgaon: Penguin.
29.
NandyA. (1988) ‘Introduction: Science as a Reason of State’. In NandyA. (Ed), Science, Hegemony and Violence: A Requiem for Modernity (pp. 2–16). New Delhi: United Nations University.
30.
NarasimhaR. (2008) ‘Science, Technology and the Economy: An Indian Perspective’, Technology in Society, 30(3): 330–8.
31.
NehruJ. (1956, April21) ‘Convocation Address in the First Annual Convocation of IIT Kharagpur’. URL (consulted 9December2021), from https://web.scholarsavenue.org/convocation-address-by-shri-jawaharlal-nehru-at-the-first-annual-convocation-held-on-21st-april-1956-a99859b9aaa2
32.
OakleyG.Jr. (1972) ‘Operational Interactions’. In Kanpur Indo-American Program: Final Report (1962–1972) (pp. 83–98). Cambridge, MA: Education Development Center.
33.
PrakashG. (1999) Another Reason: Science and the Imagination of Modern India. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
34.
PrattM.L. (2008) Imperial Eyes: Travel Writing and Transculturation. New York: Routledge.
35.
RostowW.W. (1971) The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto. London: Cambridge University Press.
36.
SarkarN.R. (1946) An Interim Report of the Committee Appointed to Consider the Development of Higher Technical Institutions in India. URL (consulted 9December2021), from https://www.iitsystem.ac.in/sites/default/files/reviewreports/N.R.Sarkar.pdf
37.
ShinG.-W. & MoonR.J. (2018) From Brain Drain to Brain Circulation and Linkage. Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center Working Paper. Stanford: Stanford University. URL (consulted 12December2021), from https://fsi-live.s3.us-west-1.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/brain_drain_to_circulation_and_linkage_0.pdf
38.
ShivaV. (1988) Staying Alive: Women, Ecology and Survival in India. New Delhi: Kali for Women.
39.
TilakB.G. (1922) Bal Gangadhar Tilak: His Writings and Speeches. Introduced by Aurobindo Ghose. Madras: Ganesh and Co.
40.
YokoiK. (2015) ‘The Colombo Plan and the Industrialization in India: Technical Cooperation for Indian Institutes of Technology’. In AkitaS., KrozewskiG. & WatanabeS. (Eds), The Transformation of the International Order of Asia: Decolonization, the Cold War, and the Colombo Plan (pp. 50–71). Abingdon: Routledge.
41.
ZelinskyW. (1975) ‘The Demigod’s Dilemma’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 65(2): 123–43.
