The domestic labour market in India reflects how various classes of women manage their daily lives, whether as employers of domestic workers or as employees. The cultural underpinnings of various intersecting relationships implicated in this scenario have remained underresearched in India. Based on a qualitative study in a specific neighbourhood of New Delhi, this article shows that certain cultural strategies pursued by female employers explain their differential behaviour towards specific groups of maids. Observing that these female employers in Delhi prefer Nepali maids over native Indians, even if the latter are willing to work for lower wages, we set out to analyse why and how these employers evaluate immigrant Nepali maids as sharing ‘our’ culture, while native Indians are classified as the cultural ‘other’.
AdibA. & GuerrierY. (2003) ‘The Interlocking of Gender with Nationality, Race, Ethnicity and Class: The Narratives of Women in Hotel Work’, Gender, Work and Organization, X(4): 413–32.
2.
BakanA. & StasiulisD. (1995) ‘Making the Match: Domestic Placement Agencies and the Racialization of Women’s Household Work’, Signs, XX(2): 303–35.
3.
BakanA. & StasiulisD. (2003) Negotiating Citizenship: Migrant Women in Canada and the Global System. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
4.
BasnetC. (2015) ‘Inter-caste Relations and Intermarriage among Non-Dalit Hill Castes in Eastern Nepal’, Contribution to Nepalese Studies, XLII(1): 167–86.
5.
BasnetC. & SandhyaA.S. (2019) ‘Nepali Domestic Workers in New Delhi: Strategies and Agency’, Dhaulagiri Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, XIII: 49–57.
6.
BauderH. (2001) ‘Culture in the Labor Market: Segmentation Theory and Perspectives of Place’, Progress in Human Geography, XXV(1): 37–52.
7.
BauderH (2005) ‘Habitus, Rules of the Labour Market and Employment Strategies of Immigrants in Vancouver, Canada’, Social and Cultural Geography, VI(1): 81–97.
8.
BeteilleA. (1996) ‘Caste in Contemporary India’. In FullerC. (Ed.), Caste Today (pp. 150–79). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
BhattraiR. (2007) Open Borders, Closed Citizenships: Nepali Labour Migrants in Delhi. The Hague: Institute of Social Studies.
10.
BistaD.B. (1991) Fatalism and Development: Nepal’s Struggle for Modernization. New Delhi: Orient Longman.
11.
CaplanL. (1991) ‘“Bravest of the Brave”: Representations of “The Gurkha” in British Military Writings’, Modern Asian Studies, XXV(3): 571–97.
12.
ChakravartiU. (1993) ‘Conceptualising Brahmanical Patriarchy in Early India: Gender, Caste, Class and State’, Economic and Political Weekly, XXVIII(14): 579–85.
13.
ChakravartiU (1995) ‘Gender, Caste, and Labour: Ideological and Material Structure of Widowhood’, Economic and Political Weekly, XXX(36): 2248–56.
14.
ChopraR. (2006) ‘Invisible Men: Masculinity, Sexuality, and Male Domestic Labor’, Men and Masculinities, IX(2): 152–67.
15.
DattaP. (2004) ‘Push-Pull Actors of Undocumented Migration from Bangladesh to West Bengal: A Perception Study’, The Qualitative Report, IX(2): 335–58.
16.
DevasahayamT.W. (2005) ‘Power and Pleasure around the Stove: The Construction of Gendered Identity in Middle-Class South Indian Hindu Households in Urban Malaysia’, Women’s Studies International Forum, XXVIII(1): 1–20.
17.
DickeyS. (2000) ‘Permeable Homes: Domestic Service, Household Space, and the Vulnerability of Class Boundaries in Urban India’, American Ethnologist, 27(2): 462–89.
18.
DurrenbergerE.P. (2006) ‘Labour’. In CarrierJ. G. (Ed.), A Handbook of Economic Anthropology (pp. 125–40). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
19.
DuttaM. (2006) ‘“Men Not Allowed”: The Social Construction and Rewards of the Work of Domestic Maids of Kolkata. Ottawa: Carleton University (PhD Thesis).
20.
ElsonD. & PearsonR. (1981) ‘“Nimble Fingers Make Cheap Workers”: An Analysis of Women’s Employment in Third World Export Manufacturing’, Feminist Review, VII(1): 87–107.
21.
FishmanP.M. (1978) ‘Interaction: The Work Women Do’, Social Problems, XXV(4): 397–406.
22.
FrantzE. (2008) ‘Of Maids and Madams: Sri Lankan Domestic Workers and their Employers in Jordan’, Critical Asian Studies, XL(4): 609–38.
23.
GellnerD.N.Pfaff-CzarneckaJ. & WhelptonJ. (2008 [1997]) Nationalism and Ethnicity in Nepal. Kathmandu: Vajra Publications.
24.
GranerE. & GurungG. (2003) ‘Arab ko Lahure: Looking at Nepali Labour Migrants to Arabian Countries’, Contributions to Nepalese Studies, XXX(2): 295–325.
25.
GroverS. (2017) Marriage, Love, Caste and Kinship Support: Lived Experiences of the Urban Poor in India. New Delhi: Social Science Press.
26.
GroverS.ChambersT. & JefferyP. (2018) ‘Portraits of Women’s Paid Domestic-Care Labour: Ethnographic Studies from Globalizing India’, Journal of South Asian Development, XIII(2): 123–40.
27.
GuptaC. (2016) The Gender of Caste. Representing Dalits in Print. Seattle and London: University of Washington Press.
28.
GurungS.H. (2009) ‘Nepali Female Migrants and Informalization of Domestic Care Work: Service or Servitude?’, Journal of Workplace Rights, XIV(3): 375–96.
29.
GurungS.H. & PurkayasthaB. (2013) ‘Gendered Labour: Experiences of Nepali Women within Pan Co-Ethnic Informal Labour Markets in New York and Boston’. In NildaF. & GuevarraA.R. (Eds), Immigrant Women Workers in the Neoliberal Age (pp. 81–94). Springfield, IL: University of Illinois Press.
30.
Harriss-WhiteB. (2005) India’s Market Society: Three Essays in Political Economy. New Delhi: Three Essays Collective.
31.
HuangS. & YeohB.S. (1998) ‘Maids and Ma’ams in Singapore: Constructing Gender and Nationality in the Transnationalization of Paid Domestic Work’, Geography Research Forum, XVIII: 22–48.
32.
JeelaniG. (2017, 19July) ‘Noida: Mob Violence at Mahagun Moderne Exposes Deep Class Fault Lines. Retrieved from https://www.hindustantimes.com/noida/mobbing-of-noida-society-exposes-deep-class-fault-lines-in-gated-residential-societies/story-2AwGF4MFqaFK721pqsh31I.html
33.
JodhkaS.S. & NewmanK. (2012) ‘In the Name of Globalisation: Meritocracy, Productivity and the Hidden Language of Caste’. In ThoratS. & NewmanK. (Eds), Blocked by Caste: Economic Discrimination in Modern India (pp. 52–87). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
34.
KandiyotiD. (1988) ‘Bargaining with Patriarchy’, Gender and Society, II(3): 274–90.
35.
KumarA. (2010) ‘Illegal Bangladeshi Migration to India: Impact on Internal Security’, Strategic Analysis, XXXV(1): 106–19.
36.
KumarV. (2014) ‘Scavenger Community at the Crossroads: Reflection on State Intervention, Welfare and Abstruse Welfarism’, Indian Journal of Dalit and Tribal Social Work, II(1): 1–11.
37.
LanP.C. (2003) ‘Maid or Madam? Filipina Migrant Workers and the Continuity of Domestic Labor’, Gender & Society, XVII(2): 187–208.
38.
MahantaU. & GuptaI. (2019) Recognition of the Rights of Domestic Workers in India: Challenges and the Way Forward. Singapore: Springer.
39.
MillsM.B. (2003) ‘Gender and Inequality in the Global Labor Force’, Annual Reviews Anthropology, XXXII: 41–62.
40.
NaiduS.C. (2016) ‘Domestic Labour and Female Labour Force Participation’, Economic and Political Weekly, LI (44/45): 101–8.
41.
NathL. (2006) ‘Migration, Insecurity and Identity: The Nepali Dairymen in India’s Northeast’, Asian Ethnicity, VII(2): 129–48.
42.
NgqakayiN.C. (1991) Subjectivity in the ‘Maid’/’Madam’ Relationship and Its Effects on the Occupational Child Care-Giving Functions of the Domestic Worker. Cape Town: University of Cape Town (PhD Dissertation).
43.
OntaP. (1996) ‘Ambivalence Denied: The Making of Rastriya Itihas in Panchayat Era Textbooks’, Contributions to Nepalese Studies, XXIII(1): 213–54.
44.
PalriwalaR. & NeethaN. (2009) Paid Care Workers in India: Domestic Workers and Anganwadi Workers. Research Report. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
45.
PandeyG. (1999) ‘Can a Muslim Be an Indian?’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, XLI(4): 608–29.
46.
QayumS. & RayR. (2003) ‘Grappling with Modernity. India’s Respectable Classes and the Culture of Domestic Servitude’, Ethnography, IV(4): 520–55.
47.
QayumS. & RayR. (2010) ‘Male Servants and the Failure of Patriarchy in Kolkata’, Men and Masculinities, XIII(1): 111–25.
48.
RavichandranB. (2011) ‘Scavenging Profession: Between Class and Caste?’, Economic and Political Weekly, 46(13): 21–5.
49.
RayR. & QayumS. (2009) Cultures of Servitude: Modernity, Domesticity, and Class in India. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
50.
SinghB.N. (2016) ‘Socio-Economic Conditions of Slums Dwellers: A Theoretical Study’, Kaav International Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, III(3): 77–91.
51.
SoumiD. (2014) ‘The Situation in Contractual Work at Domestic Sphere: A Study of the Paid Female Domestic Workers of Howrah, West Bengal, India’, International Research Journal of Social Sciences, III(7): 36–42.
52.
SubbaT.B.SinhaA.C.NepalG.S. & NepalD.R. (2009) Indian Nepalis: Issues and Perspectives. New Delhi: Concept.
53.
ThoratS. & NewmanK. (2012) ‘In the Name of Globalisation: Meritocracy, Productivity and the Hidden Language of Caste’. In ThoratS. & NewmanK. (Eds), Blocked by Caste: Economic Discrimination in Modern India (pp. 52–87). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
54.
TripathiT. (2012) ‘Safai Karmi Scheme of Uttar Pradesh: Caste Dominance Continues’, Economic and Political Weekly, XLVII(37): 26–9.
55.
WhissonM.G. & WeilW. (1971) Domestic Servants: A Microcosm of the ‘Race Problem’. Johannesburg: South African Institute of Race Relations.
56.
YeohB.S.A. & HuangS. (1998) ‘Negotiating Public Space: Strategies and Styles of Migrant Female Domestic Workers in Singapore’, Urban Studies, XXXV(3): 583–602.
57.
YeohB.S.A.HuangS. & Gonzalez IIIJ. (1999) ‘Migrant Female Domestic Workers: Debating the Economic, Social and Political Impacts in Singapore’, International Migration Review, XXXIII(1): 114–36.
