Despite strong constitutional safeguards and promises, malnutrition persists in major Indian conurbations such as Mumbai and manifests as a group phenomenon concentrated in certain slum pockets that remain institutionally isolated. Based on a detailed study of four slums in Mumbai, this article uses the entitlement approach developed by Amartya Sen to examine how group identity affects group differentials in achievement of basic capabilities. Irrespective of similar initial endowments, some groups were found able to achieve upward mobility over time, whereas others remained constantly vulnerable. This may be because the access to various resources and the ability to translate them into functioning assets are mediated in various ways, depending on people’s multiple identities, which sometimes constitute barriers. The article concludes that to alleviate malnutrition, proactive state agency and public transfers are needed to enhance deprived groups’ prospects to build on their basic capabilities to improve their lives.
AgarwalBina (1996) A Field of One’s Own: Gender and Land Rights in South Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
AlamgirM. (1980) Famine in South Asia: Political Economy of Mass Starvation. Cambridge: Gunn and Hain.
3.
AppasamyP.GuhanSHemaR.MajumdarManabiVaidyanathanA. (1996) Social Exclusion from a Welfare Rights Perspective in India. Geneva: ILO Publications. (IILS-UNDP Research Series 106).
4.
BirnerRegina (2007) Improving Governance to Eradicate Hunger and Poverty. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (2020 Focus Brief on World’s Poor and Hungry People).
5.
De WaalA. (1990) ‘A Re-assessment of Entitlement Theory in the Light of the Recent Famines in Africa’, Development and Change, 21(3): 469–90.
6.
DrezeJeanSenAmartya (1989) Hunger and Public Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7.
DrydykJay (2011) ‘Responsible Pluralism, Capabilities and Human Rights’, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 12(1): 39–61.
8.
GoreCharles (1993) ‘Entitlement Relations and “Unruly” Social Practices: A Comment on the Work of Amartya Sen’, Journal of Development Studies, 29 (3): 429–60.
9.
HossainMoazzem (2014) ‘Building Responsible Social Protection in South Asia: India’s Food Security Act as a New Direction’, South Asia Research, 34(2), July: 133–53.
10.
HussainAthar (1992) ‘Reviews’, The Economic Journal, 102(414): 1251–4.
11.
IIPS (2009) Health and Living Conditions in Eight Indian Cities, NFHS-3. Mumbai: International Institute for Population Sciences.
12.
IPC (2007) The Challenge of Inequality, Poverty in Focus. Brasilia: International Poverty Centre.
13.
JustinoP.LitchfieldJ. (2003) Economic Exclusion and Discrimination: The Experiences of Minorities and Indigenous Peoples. London: Minority Rights Group International.
14.
LaderchiCaterina RuggeriSaithRuhiStewartFrances (2003) ‘Does It Matter that We Do not Agree on the Definition of Poverty? A Comparison of Four Approaches’, Oxford Development Studies, 31(3): 243–74.
15.
MalekarAnosh (2006, October) ‘Empty Belly of Bhandup’. Info Change News and Features. URL (consulted 6November2008), from www.infochangeindia.org
16.
MinhasGitanjali (2011, February14) ‘Malnutrition Killing Children in India’s Shanghai’. Governance Now. URL (consulted 19June2012), from www.governancenow.com
17.
NayakPurushottam (2000) ‘Understanding the Entitlement Approach to Famine’, Journal of Assam University, 5(1): 60–5.
18.
NussbaumMartha C. (2011) ‘Capabilities, Entitlements, Rights: Supplementation and Critique’, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 12(1): 23–37.
19.
ODI (2001) ‘Economic Theory, Freedom and Human Rights: The Work of Amartya Sen’. London: Overseas Development Institute. (ODI Briefing Paper).
20.
O’NeilTammiePironLaure-Helene (2003) ‘Rights-based Approach to Tackling Discrimination and Horizontal Inequality’. London: Overseas Development Institute. (Background Paper Poverty and Public Policy Group).
21.
OsmaniS.R. (1993) ‘The Entitlement Approach to Famine: An Assessment’. Helsinki: World Institute for Development Economic Research (WIDER Working Paper No. 107).
22.
SenAmartya (1981) Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
23.
SenAmartya (1984) Resources, Values and Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
SenAmartya (1986) ‘Food, Economics and Entitlements’. Helsinki: World Institute for Development Economics Research. (WIDER Working Paper No. 1).
25.
SenAmartya (1990) ‘Gender and Cooperative Conflict’. In TinkerIrene (Ed.), Persistent Inequalities: Women and World Development (pp. 123–49). New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
SenAmartya (1999) Development and Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
SenAmartya (2006) Identity and Violence: The Illusion of Destiny. New York: Norton.
28.
SmithMatthew LongshoreSewardCarolina (2009) ‘The Relational Ontology of Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach: Incorporating Social and Individual Causes’, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 10(2): 213–35.
29.
SolankiGopika (2011) Adjudication in Religious Family Laws: Cultural Accommodation, Legal Pluralism, and Gender Equality in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
StewartFrances (1999, June14–15) ‘Crisis Prevention: Tackling Horizontal Inequalities’. Paper Presented at the World Bank Conference on Evaluation and Poverty Reduction, Washington, DC.
31.
StewartFrances (2004, September5–7) ‘Groups and Capabilities’. Paper Presented at the Fourth Conference on the Capability Approach: Enhancing Human Security in Pavia, Italy.
32.
WanderleyLilian Outtes (2001, June5–7) ‘Sen’s Capability Approach: A Meaningful Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility’. Paper Presented in the Seminar on Justice and Poverty: Examining Sen’s Capability Approach, Cambridge, MA: Von Hugal Institute.
