This article examines how the politics of scale affect a process of dialogue led by civil society actors over fishing conflicts taking place at the local level in South Asia. The location is the Palk Bay and the fishers are Tamils from India and Sri Lanka. An agreement over fishing rights reached between these fishers in August 2010 remains largely unimplemented, but takes centre stage for this article, which examines the negotiation processes in terms of politics of scale and highlights the various difficulties encountered. Major pitfalls in a dialogue of this sort are the failure to recognise diversity within the population(s) involved and lack of recognition of the linkages of this population with other actors at different scales or levels. In a transboundary context, national and regional identities at times override local identity and interests, thereby making locally constructed solutions difficult, if not impossible, to implement.
AgnewJohn (1997) ‘The Dramaturgy of Horizons: Geographical Scale in the Reconstruction of Italy by the New Italian Political Parties, 1992–95’, Political Geography, 16(2): 99–121.
2.
AgrawalArun (1999) ‘Community-in-Conservation: Tracing the Outlines of an Enchanting Concept’. In
JefferyRogerSundarNandini (Eds), A New Moral Economy for India’s Forests? (pp. 92–108). London: SAGE.
3.
AgrawalArunGoyalSanjeev (2001) ‘Group Size and Collective Action: Third-party Monitoring in Common Pool Resources’, Comparative Political Studies, 34(1): 63–93.
4.
AgrawalArunOstromElinor (2001) ‘Collective Action, Property Rights and Decentralization in Resource Use in India and Nepal’, Politics and Society, 29(4): 485–514.
5.
BaileyConnor (1985) ‘Blue Revolution: The Impact of Technological Innovation on Third World Fisheries’, The Rural Sociologist, 5(4): 259–66.
6.
BavinckMaarten (2001) Marine Resource Management. Conflict and Regulation in the Fisheries of the Coromandel Coast. New Delhi: SAGE.
7.
BavinckMaarten(2003) ‘The Spatially Splintered State: Myths and Realities in the Regulation of Marine Fisheries in Tamil Nadu, India’, Development and Change, 34(4):633–57.
8.
BavinckMaarten(2005) ‘Understanding Fisheries Conflicts in the South–A Legal Pluralist Perspective’, Society and Natural Resources, 18(9): 805–20.
9.
BavinckMaarten(2011a) ‘Governance, Poverty and Social Justice in the Coastal Fisheries of India’. In
PouwN.R.M.BaudIS.A.
(Eds), Local Governance and Poverty in Developing Nations (pp. 115–36). New York: Routledge.
10.
BavinckMaarten(2011b) ‘Wealth, Poverty and Immigration. The Role of Institutions in the Fisheries of Tamil Nadu, India’. In
JentoftSveinArneEide (Eds),> Poverty Mosaics: Realities and Prospects in Small-scale Fisheries (pp. 173–91). Dordrecht: Springer.
11.
BavinckMaartenJohnsonDerek (2008) ‘Handling the Legacy of the Blue Revolution in India: Social Justice and Small-Scale Fisheries in a Negative Growth Scenario’. In
NielsenJenniferDodsonJulian J.FriedlandKevinHamonTory R.MusickJackVerspoorEric (Eds),Reconciling Fisheries with Conservation: Proceedings of the Fourth World Fisheries Congress American Fisheries Society Symposium>(pp. 585–99). Bethesda, MA: American Fisheries Society.
12.
Benda-BeckmannFranz vonBenda-BeckmannKeebet vonGriffithsAnne (2009) ‘Space and Legal Pluralism: An Introduction’. In
Benda-BeckmannFranz vonBenda-BeckmannKeebet vonGriffithsAnne (Eds), Spatializing Law: An Anthropological Geography of Law in Society (pp. 1–29). Farnham: Ashgate.
13.
BerkesFikret (Ed.) (1989) Common Property Resources: Ecology and Community-based Sustainable Development. London: Belhaven Press.
14.
BerkesFikret(Ed.) (2006) ‘From Community-based Resource Management to Complex Systems: The Scale Issue and Marine Commons’, Ecology and Society>, 11(1:45). Available athttp://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art45/(last accessed on 3 March 2013).
15.
BrownJ. ChristopherPurcellMark (2005) ‘There’s Nothing Inherent About Scale: Political Ecology, the Local Trap, and the Politics of Development in the Brazilian Amazon’, Geoforum, 36(5): 607–24.
16.
CMFRI (2012) Marine Fisheries Census for India 2010. Cochin: Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute.
17.
CoxR. Kevin (1998) ‘Spaces of Dependence, Spaces of Engagement and the Politics of Scale, or: Looking for Local Politics’, Political Geography, 17(1): 1–23.
18.
DukesMatthea Johanna Meijnouda (2007) Place, Positioning and European Urban Policy Discourse: Examples of Politics of Scale in ‘Brussels’ and the Netherlands. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdamt. PhD thesis. Available ahttp://dare.uva.nl/record/208632(last accessed on 12 April 2012 ).
19.
GuijtIreneShahMeera Kaul (Eds) (1998) The Myth of Community: Gender Issues in Participatory Development. London: ITDG Publishing.
20.
GuptaCharu(2007) ’Bonded Bodies: Coastal Fisherfolk, Everyday Migrations, and National Anxieties in India and Sri Lanka’, Cultural Dynamics,19(2/3): 237–55.
21.
HardinGarrett (1968) ‘The Tragedy of the Commons’, Science, New Series, 162(3859) (13December): 1243–48.
22.
HerodAndrew (2003) ‘Scale: The Local and the Global’. In
HollowaySarah L.RiceStephen P.ValentineGill (Eds), Key Concepts in Geography (pp. 229–47). London: SAGE.
23.
HornellJames (1922) ‘The Indian Pearl Fisheries of the Gulf of Mannar and Palk Bay’, Bulletin of the Madras Fisheries Department, 16: 1–188.
24.
JayasingheW.T. (2003) Kachchativu and the Maritime Boundary of Sri Lanka. Pannipitiya: Stamford Lake Publication.
25.
JefferyRogerSundarNandini (1999) ‘Introduction’. In
JefferyRogerSundarNandini (Eds), A New Moral Economy for India’s Forests? (pp. 1–22). London: SAGE.
26.
JentoftSvein (2000) ‘The Community: A Missing link in Fisheries Management’, Marine Policy, 24(1): 53–60.
27.
JentoftSveinMcCayJ. Bonnie (1995) ‘User Participation in Fisheries Management Lessons Drawn from International Experiences’, Marine Policy, 19(3): 227–46.
28.
JentoftSveinMcCayJ. BonnieWilsonDouglas C. (1998) ‘Social Theory and Fisheries Co-Management’,Marine Policy, 22(4–5): 423–36.
29.
JentoftSveinPaulOnyango O.IslamMohammad Mahmudu (2010)
‘Freedom and Poverty in the Fishery Commons’, International Journal of the Commons, 4(1): 345–66.
30.
KrishnaSankaran (1999) Postcolonial Insecurities: India, Sri Lanka, and the Question of Nationhood. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
31.
KurienJohn (1978) ‘Entry of Big Business into Fishing: Its Impact on Fish Economy’, Economic and Political Weekly, 13(36):1557–65.
32.
LebelLouisGardenPoImamuraMasao (2005) ‘The Politics of Scale, Position, and Place in the Governance of Water Resources in the Mekong Region’, Ecology and Society, 10(2:18). Available athttp://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss2/art18/(last accessed on 3 March 2013).
33.
LeitnerHelgaSheppardEricSziartoM. Kristin (2008) ‘The Spatialities of Contentious Politics’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 33(2): 157–72.
34.
MarstonA. Sallie (2000) ‘The Social Construction of Scale’, Progress in Human Geography, 24(2): 219–42.
35.
Meinzen-DickSuseela RuthDi GregorioMonica
(Eds) (2004) Collective Action and Property Rights for Sustainable Development. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (2020 Focus, 11). Available athttp://www.ifpri.org/sites/default/files/pubs/2020/focus/focus11/focus11.pdf (last accessed on 12 April 2012).
36.
O’ReillyKathleen (2011) ‘Development is Seductive’, Environment and Planning, A43(12): 2788–800.
37.
OstromElinor (1998) ‘A Behavioural Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action’. Presidential Address, American Political Science Association, 1997, American Political Science Review, 92(1): 1–22.
38.
OstromElinor (2000)‘ Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3): 137–58.
39.
PinkertonEvelyn (Ed) (1989) Co-operative Management of Local Fisheries: New Directions for Improved Management and Community Development. Vancouver: UBC Press.
40.
PrettyJules(2003) ‘Social Capital and the Collective Management of Resources’, Science, 302(5652), 12December: 1912–14.
41.
RamK. (1991) Mukkuvar Women. Gender, Hegemony, and Capitalist Transformation in a South Indian Fishing Village. London: Zed Books.
42.
RobertsMichael (2013) ‘Towards Citizenship in Thāmilīlam: Sri Lanka’s Tamil People of the North, 1983–2010’, South Asia Research, 33(1): 57–76.
43.
SathyapalanJyothisJeenaSrinivasan T.ScholtensJoeri (2008) Fishing Fleet Reduction and its Livelihood Implications: A Case Study of Palk Bay Resource Users in the East Coast of Tamil Nadu, India.Working Document, UNTRS & FAO of the United Nations.Rome: FAO.
44.
ScholtensJoeriBavinckMaartenSoosaiS. Agustine (2012) ‘Fishing in Dire Straits, Transboundary Incursions in Palk Bay’, Economic and Political Weekly, 47(25): 87–96.
45.
SmithNeil (1992) ‘Geography, Difference and the Politics of Scale’. In
DohertyJoeGrahamElspethMalekMohammed H. (Eds), Postmodernism and the Social Sciences (pp. 57–79). London: Macmillan.
46.
SteinbergE. Philip (1999) ‘The Maritime Mystique: Sustainable Development, Capital Mobility and Nostalgia in the World-Ocean’, Environment and Planning D: Society & Space, 17(4): 403–26.
47.
SubramanianAjantha (2003) ‘Communities, Class, and Conservation: Development Politics on the Kanyakumari Coast’, Conservation and Society, 1(2): 177–208.
48.
SubramanianAjantha (2009) Shorelines: Space and Rights in South India. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
SuryanarayanV. (2005) Conflict over Fisheries in the Palk Bay Region. New Delhi: Lancer.
51.
SwyngedouwErik (1997) ‘Neither Global nor Local: “Glocalization” and the Politics of Scale’. In
CoxKevin (Ed.), Spaces of Globalization: Reasserting the Power of the Local (pp. 137–66). New York: Guilford Press.
52.
SwyngedouwErik (2004) ‘Scaled Geographies: Nature, Place and the Politics of Scale’. In
SheppardEricMcMasterRobert B. (Eds), Scale Geographic Inquiry Nature, Society, and Method (pp. 129–53). Victoria: Blackwell.
53.
VivekanandanV. (2001) ‘Crossing Maritime Borders: The Problem and Solution in the Indo-Sri Lankan Context’. In
ICSFIOI (Eds), Forging Unity: Coastal Communities and the Indian Ocean’s Future (pp. 76–89). Chennai: International Collective in Support of Fish Workers.
54.
VivekanandanV. (2004) Fishing for a Favour: Netting a Lesson. Trivandrum: South Indian Federation of Fishermen Societies.
55.
VivekanandanV. (2010) ‘Trawl Brawl’. In Samudra.Report No. 57: 24–7.Chennai: International Collective in Support of Fishworkers.
