This article examines the development of colonial law in Malabar between 1792 and 1810. Within the historical context of emerging colonialism as a pivotal factor, it shows that there was no simple unilinear process in the making of colonial law in this region of India, but rather a series of continuities and discontinuities of practices. A clear shift in the logic of governance is identified, however, as new technologies of power, particularly writing and documentation, resulted in several formalities of practices in the making of the colonial state and legal system in India.
AbrahamSanthosh (2007) ‘From Negotiation to the Making of Dominance: Colonial Law in Early British Malabar (1792–93)’. In HanglooRattanlalMuraliA. (eds.), New Themes in Indian History: Art, Politics, Gender, Environment and Culture (pp.160–74). New Delhi: Black & White.
2.
ArnoldDavid (1986) Police Power and Colonial Rule: Madras 1859–1947. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
3.
ArunimaG. (2003) There Comes Papa: Colonialism and the Transformation of Matriliny in Kerala, Malabar, 1850–1940. Hyderabad: Orient Longman.
4.
BaxiUpendra (1992) ‘The State’s Emissary: The Place of Law in Subaltern Studies’. In ChatterjeeParthaPandeyGyanendra (eds.), Subaltern Studies VII (pp. 248–64). Delhi: Oxford University Press.
5.
BaylyC.A. (1988) Indian Society and the Making of the British Empire. The New Cambridge History of India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BaylyC.A. (1993) ‘Knowing the Country: Empire and Information in India’, Modern Asian Studies, 27(1): 3–43.
7.
BaylyC.A. (1999) Empire and Information: Intelligence Gathering and Social Communication in India, 1780–1870. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BrimnesNiels (2003) ‘Beyond Colonial Law: Indigenous Litigation and the Contestation of Property in the Mayor’s Court in the Late Eighteenth-Century Madras’, Modern Asian Studies, 37(3): 513–50.
9.
CerteauMichel de (1988) The Writing of History. Trans. ConleyTom. New York: Columbia University Press.
10.
ChandraSudhir (1998) Enslaved Daughters. Colonialism, Law and Women’s Rights. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
11.
ChatterjeePartha (1993) The Nation and its Fragments: Colonial and Postcolonial Histories. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
12.
CohnBernard (1959) ‘Some Notes on Law and Change in North India’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 8(1) (October): 79–93.
13.
EngelsDagmar (1983) ‘The Age of Consent Act of 1891: Colonial Ideology in Bengal’, South Asia Research, 3(2): 107–34.
14.
FoucaultMichel (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Allen Lane.
15.
GaneshK.N. (2005) ‘From Contact to Conquest’, Review, Indian Economic and Social History Review, 42(4): 564–6.
16.
GuhaRanajit (1987) ‘Chandra’s Death’. In GuhaRanajit (ed.), Subaltern Studies V (pp. 135–65). Delhi: Oxford University Press.
17.
InnesC.A.EvansF.B. (1997 [1908]) Malabar Gazetteers, 2 Vols. Trivandrum: Government of Kerala.
18.
KavirajSudipta (1994) ‘On the Construction of Colonial Power: Structure, Discourse, Hegemony’. In EngelsDagmarMarksShula (eds.), Contesting Colonial Hegemony: State and Society in Africa and India (pp. 19–54). London: British Academic Press.
19.
KurupK.K.N. (2004) Pazhassi Samara Rekhakal (Documents on Pazhassi Struggles) (In Malayalam). Kozhikode: Mathrubhumi.
20.
LoganWilliam (1951 [1887]) Malabar Manual. Madras: Government Press.
21.
LoganWilliam (ed.) (1998 [1879]) A Collection of Treaties, Engagements and Other Papers of Importance Relating to British Affairs in Malabar. Malabar Manual, Vol. III. Thiruvananthapuram: Government Press.
22.
MukhopadhyayAnindita (2006) Behind the Mask: The Cultural Definition of the Legal Subject in Colonial Bengal, 1775–1911. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
23.
MunroThomas (1912) Report on the Revision of Revenue and Judicial System in the Province of Malabar, 4 July 1817. Calicut: Calicut Collectorate Press.
24.
NarayananM.G.S. (ed.) (1987) Vanjeri Grandhavari. Calicut: Calicut University Press. (Calicut University Historical Series, No. 1.)
25.
PaulJohn J. (1991) The Legal Profession in Colonial South India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
26.
RajaP.K.S. (1953) Medieval Kerala. Annamalainagar: Annamalai University Historical Series.
27.
RamanKartik Kalyan (1994) ‘Utilitarianism and the Criminal Law in Colonial India: A Study of the Practical Limits of Utilitarian Jurisprudence’, Modern Asian Studies, 28(4): 750–8.
28.
RavindranT.K. (1969a) Cornwallis System in Malabar. Calicut: Parasparasahayi.
29.
RavindranT.K. (1969b) Malabar under Bombay Presidency. Calicut: Mascot Press.
30.
RossCharles (ed.) (1859) Correspondence of Charles, First Marquis Cornwallis, 3 Vols. Vol. I. London: John Murray.
31.
ShoreJohn (1865) A Report on Judicial System of Malabar. Madras: Madras Government Press.
32.
SinghaRadhika (1998) A Despotism of Law: Crime and Justice in Early Colonial India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
33.
SteinBurton (1985) ‘State Formation and Economy Reconsidered’, Part One, Modern Asian Studies, 19(3): 387–413.
34.
StokesEric (1959) The English Utilitarians and India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
35.
TraversRobert (2005) ‘Ideology and Expansion in Bengal, 1757–1772’, Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 33(1): 7–27.
36.
TraversRobert (2007) Ideology and Empire in Eighteenth-Century India: The British in Bengal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
WashbrookDavid (1981) ‘Law, State and Agrarian Society in Colonial India’, Modern Asian Studies, 15(3): 649–721.
38.
WashbrookDavid (1988) ‘Progress and Problems: South Asian Economic and Social History, c. 1720–1860’, Modern Asian Studies, 22(1): 57–96.
39.
WashbrookDavid (2004) ‘South India 1770–1840: The Colonial Transition’, Modern Asian Studies, 38(3): 476–516.
40.
ZachariaScariaSkariahJoseph (eds.) (1994) Thallasseri Rekhakal, Text with Critical Studies. Kottayam: DC Books.
