One of the most intractable problems confronting South Asian states and societies has been the presence of secessionist movements and insistent demands for a state of one's own. Though societies and states tend to react violently when faced with such demands, many serious issues are embedded in secessionist demands, as well as in the responses to these demands, above all issues of justice and injustice. The present article seeks to trace out the key issues involved in demands for secession, exploring reasons for why and when such demands arise in the first place. Examined within the wider context of international law, specific scenarios in South Asia are considered to propel a debate about whether secession can be argued to be a right, and in what circumstances. It is proposed that the concept of secession has, in effect, to be extricated from narrow agendas of national security, war against terror, and military strategy, and placed within the wider domain of normative political theory, which can indeed find justifications for demanding secession.
Bakshi, P.M. (2007) The Constitution of India. Delhi: Universal Law Publishers .
2.
Buchanan, Allen (1991) Secession: The Morality of Political Divorce from Fort Sumter to Lithuania and Quebec. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press .
3.
Buchanan, Allen (1997) ‘ Theories of Secession ’. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 26(1): 30–61 .
4.
Buchanan, Allen (2004) Justice, Legitimacy and Self-Determination. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
5.
Bazaz, Prem Nath (1954) The History of Struggle for Freedom in Kashmir. New Delhi: Kashmir Publishing House .
6.
Behera, Navnita Chaddha (2007) Demystifying Kashmir. New Delhi: Pearsons .
7.
Brilmayer, Lea (1991) ‘ Secession and Self-Determination: A Territorial Interpretation ’. Yale Journal of International Law, 16(1): 177–202 .
8.
Census of India (2001) ‘Data on Religion’. URL (consulted April, 2007), from www.censusindia.net/religion
9.
Chalk, Peter (2003) ‘The Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam: Insurgency in Sri Lanka’. In Rajat Ganguly and Ian Macduff (eds.), Ethnic Conflict and Secessionism in South and Southeast Asia: Causes, Dynamics, Solutions (pp. 128–65). New Delhi: Sage .
10.
Chandhoke, Neera (1999) Beyond Secularism: The Rights of Religious Minorities. New Delhi: Oxford University Press .
11.
de Silva, Kingsley (2004) ‘Terrorism and Political Agitation in Post-colonial South Asia: Jammu-Kashmir and Sri Lanka’. In Ramesh Thakur and Oddny Wiggen (eds.), South Asia in the World: Problem-Solving Perspectives on Security, Sustainable Development and Good Governance (pp. 84–103). Tokyo and New York: United Nations University Press .
12.
Dugard , John and Raic, David (2006) ‘The Role of Recognition in the Law and Practice of Secession’. In Marcelo G. Kohen (ed.), Secession: International Law Perspectives (pp. 94–137). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
13.
Evans, Alexander (2002) ‘ A Departure from History: Kashmiri Pandits, 1990–2001 ’. Contemporary South Asia, 11(1): 19–37 .
14.
Gans, Chaim (2003) The Limits of Nationalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
15.
Gurr, Ted Robert (2000) Peoples Versus States: Minorities at Risk in the New Century. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press .
16.
Hennayake, Shantha K. (1991) ‘ Opportunity Missed in the Ethno-nationalist Crisis ’. Asian Survey, 33(2): 157–64 .
17.
Idris, Iffat (2006) ‘Settling the Kashmir Conflict: The Internal Dimension’. In Waheguru Pal Singh Sidhu , Bushra Asif and Cyrus Samii (eds.), Kashmir: New Voices, New Approaches (pp. 203–24). Boulder: Lynne Rienner .
18.
Jenkins, Simon (2006) ‘ Pay Homage to Catalonia ’. The Hindu, 22 June, p. 13 .
19.
Kohen, Marcelo G. (2006) ‘Introduction’. In Marcelo G. Kohen (ed.), Secession: International Law Perspectives (pp. 1–20). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
20.
Lustick, Ian S. , Miodownik, Dan and Eidelson, Roy J. (2004) ‘ Secessionism in Multicultural States: Does Sharing of Power Prevent or Encourage it? ’. American Political Science Review, 98(2): 208–29 .
21.
Lynch, Allen C. (1999) ‘Woodrow Wilson and the Principle of National Self-determination as Applied to Habsburg Europe’. In Henry Huttenbach and Francesco Privitera (eds.), Self-Determination: From Versailles to Dayton. Its Historical Legacy (pp. 15–30). Bologna: University of Bologna and Longo Editore Ravenna .
22.
Marshall, Monty G. and Gurr, Ted R. (2005) ‘Peace and Conflict 2005’. University of Maryland, Center for International Development and Conflict Management, URL (consulted October, 2007), from http://www.makabylie.info
23.
Norman, Wayne (1998) ‘The Ethics of Secession as the Regulation of Secessionist Politics’. In Margaret Moore (ed.), National Self-determination and Secession (pp. 34–61). Oxford: Oxford University Press .
24.
Orentlicher, Diane F. (2003) ‘International Responses to Separatist Claims: Are Democratic Principles Relevant?’. In Stephen Macedo and Allen Buchanan (eds.), Secession and Self-Determination (pp. 19–49) New York: New York University Press .
25.
Philpott, Daniel (1995) ‘ In Defense of Self-determination ’. Ethics, 105(2): 352–85 .
26.
Reddy, B. Murlidhar (2007) ‘ Sri Lanka's Muslims: Out in the Cold ’. The Hindu, 30 July, p. 10 .
27.
Swami, Praveen (2002), ‘ The Long Haul ’. Frontline, 19(16): 3–16 .
28.
Tancredi, Antonello (2006) ‘A Normative “Due Process” in the Creation of States through Secession’. In Marcelo G. Kohen (ed.), Secession: International Law Perspectives (pp. 171–207). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
29.
Teson, Fernando R. (1998) A Philosophy of International Law. Boulder: Westview Press .
30.
UN General Assembly Resolution (1970) Declaration on the Principles of International Law on Friendly Relations and Cooperation Among States in Accordance with the Charter of the United Nations. 24 October 1970. A/Res/2625, XXV. URL (consulted July, 2007), from http://www.un.org
31.
UN General Assembly Resolution (1995) Declaration in Commemoration of the Fiftieth Anniversary of the United Nations. 9 November 1995. A/Res/50/6. URL (consulted July, 2007), from http://www.un.org
32.
Van Beek, Martijn (2004) ‘Dangerous Liaisons: Hindu Nationalism and Buddhist Radicalism in Ladakh’. In Satu P. Limaye , Mohan Malik and Robert G. Wirsing (eds.), Religious Radicalism and Security in South Asia (pp. 193–218). Honolulu: Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies .
