The social sciences have recently seen the formation and expansion of a new research paradigm—discursive psychology. What will be especially useful now is to detail and invigorate its theory with empirical discourse analysis. One significant area is the notion of attributional explanation, as this occurs commonly in discursive interaction. Accordingly, the present article explores its organizational and functional richness. As data, stretches of interviews are examined in which explanations are presupposed, implied, or described. From a social-constructionist-linguistics perspective, it will be seen that attributional explanation can be hypothetical and negotiable in nature, it can be structured in several layers of a different character each, and it can be associated with self-identity. Findings such as these reveal that natural human attribution is vastly more varied, intricate, and sophisticated than has been realized and that human beings are more resourceful in their sense-making than has been presumed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Antaki, C.
(Ed.). (1988). Analyzing everyday explanation: A case book of methods. London: Sage Ltd.
2.
Antaki, C.
(1994). Explaining and arguing: The social organization of accounts. London: Sage Ltd.
3.
Antaki, C.
, & Leudar, I. (1992). Explaining in conversation: Towards an argument model. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 181-194.
4.
Billig, M.
(1982). Ideology and social psychology: Extremism, moderation and contradiction. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
5.
Billig, M.
(1987). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Buttny, R.
(1993). Social accountability in communication. London: Sage Ltd.
7.
Cole, M.
(1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
Culler, J.
(1983). On deconstruction: Theory and criticism after structuralism. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
9.
Edwards, D.
, & Potter, J. (1990). Nigel Lawson’s tent: Discourse analysis, attribution theory and the social psychology of a fact. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 4-40.
10.
Edwards, D.
, & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage Ltd.
11.
Edwards, D.
, & Potter, J. (1995). Attribution. In R. Harré & P. Stearns (Eds.), Discursive psychology in practice (pp. 87-119). London: Sage Ltd.
12.
Fairclough, N.
(1989). Language and power. London: Longman.
13.
Fairclough, N.
(1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London: Longman.
14.
Gergen, K. J.
(1994). Realities and relationships: Soundings in social construction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
Goffman, E.
(1959). The presentation of the self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
16.
Grace, G.
(1987). The linguistic construction of reality. London: Croom Helm.
17.
Gumperz, J. J.
, & Levinson, S. (Eds.). (1996). Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Harré, R.
, & Gillett, G. (1994). Discursive mind. London: Sage Ltd.
19.
Harré, R.
, & Stearns, P. (1995). Introduction: psychology as discourse analysis. In R. Harré & P. Stearns (Eds.), Discursive psychology in practice (pp. 1-8). London: Sage Ltd.
20.
Harris, R.
(1981). The language myth. London: Gerald Duckworth.
21.
Harvey, J. H.
, Turnquist, D. C., & Agostinelli, G. (1988). Identifying attributions in oral and written explanations. In C. Antaki (Ed.), Analyzing everyday explanation: A casebook of methods (pp. 32-42). London: Sage Ltd.
22.
Harvey, J. H.
, Weber, A. L., & Orbuch, T. L. (1990). Interpersonal accounts: A social psychological perspective. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
23.
Heider, F.
(1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley.
24.
Hilton, D.
(1990). Conversational processes and causal explanation. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 65-81.
25.
Kelley, H.
(1973). The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28, 107-128.
26.
Lallje, M.
(1987). Attribution theory and intercultural communication. In K. Knapp, W. Enninger, & A. Rotthoff (Eds.), Analyzing intercultural communication (pp. 37-50). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
27.
Lemke, J. L.
(1997). Cognition, context, and learning: A social semiotic perspective. In D. Kirshner & J. A. Whitson (Eds.), Situated cognition: Social, semiotic and psychological perspectives (pp. 37-55). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28.
Mead, G. H.
(1977). On social psychology: Selected papers (A. Strauss, Ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29.
Parker, I.
(1992). Discourse dynamics: Critical analysis for social and individual psychology. London: Routledge.
30.
Potter, J.
, & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behavior. London: Sage Ltd.
Shi-xu
. (1995). Cultural perceptions: Exploiting the unexpected of the other. Culture and Psychology, 1, 315-342.
33.
Shi-xu
. (1997). Cultural representations: Analyzing the discourse about the other. New York: Peter Lang.
34.
Shi-xu
. (1998, December). The discourse of mind: A social constructionist linguistics outlook. Paper presented at the American Anthropological Association’s (AAA) 97th Annual Meeting, Philadelphia.
35.
Shweder, R. A.
(1990). Cultural psychology—What is it? In J. W. Stigler, R. A. Shweder, & G. Herdt (Eds.), Cultural psychology: Essays on comparative human development (pp. 1-43). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
36.
Tyler, S. A.
(1995). Prolegomena to the next linguistics. In P. W. Davis (Ed.), Alternative linguistics: Descriptive and theoretical modes (pp. 273-287). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: J. Benjamins.
37.
Van Dijk, T. A.
(1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse and Society, 4, 249-283.
38.
Wertsch, J. V.
(1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
