This work examines the effect of gender stereotypes on the perception of language by drawing together findings from the fields of speech perception, gender studies, and social psychology. Results from two speech perception experiments are reviewed that show that listeners’ stereotypes about gender, as activated by the faces and voices of speakers, alter the listeners’ perception of the fricatives /s/ and /∫/ . One experiment employs auditory-only consonant-vowel-consonant (CVC) tokens and the other employs audiovisual stimuli created from the same tokens synthesized with talking faces. This effect of stereotypes on low-level speech processing must be accounted for in models of perception, cognition, and the relationship between the physical and social environment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Berry, D. S.
, & Zebrowitz McArthur, L. (1985). Some components and consequences of a babyface. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(2), 312-323.
2.
Berscheid, E.
(1993). Forward. In A. E. Beall & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of gender (pp. vii-xvii). New York: Guilford.
3.
Bladon, R.A.W.
, Henton, C. G., & Pickering, J. B. (1984). Towards an auditory theory of speaker normalization. Language and Communication, 4(1), 59-69.
4.
Chomksy, N.
, & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.
5.
Coates, J.
(1993). The acquisition of gender-differentiated language. In Women, men, and language (chap. 7, pp. 141-167). London: Longman.
6.
Edwards, J. R.
(1979). Social class differences and the identification of sex in children’s speech. Journal of Child Language, 6, 121-127.
7.
Fiske, S. T.
, & Taylor, S. E. (1984). Social cognition. New York: Random House.
8.
Fodor, J. A.
(1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9.
Garfield, J.
(Ed.). (1987). Modularity in knowledge representation and natural-language understanding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.
Geis, F. L.
(1993). Self-fulfilling prophecies: A social psychological view of gender. In A. E. Beall & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of gender (pp. 9-54). New York: Guilford Press.
11.
Graddol, D.
, & Swann, J. (1989). The voice of authority. In Gender voices (chap. 2, pp. 12-40). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
12.
Johnson, K.
(1991). Differential effects of speaker and vowel variability on fricative perception. Language & Speech, 34(3), 265-279.
13.
Johnson, K.
, & Strand, E. A. (1998, January). Speech perception without normalization or higher order invariants. Paper presented in the “Paradigms and Problems in Phonetic Research” workshop at the annual meeting of the Lingustic Society of America, New York City.
14.
Ladefoged, P.
, & Broadbent, D. E. (1957). Information conveyed by vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 29(1), 98-104.
15.
Lass, N. J.
, Almerino, C. A., Jordan, L. F., & Walsh, J. M. (1980). The effect of filtered speech on speaker race and sex identifications. Journal of Phonetics, 8, 101-112.
16.
May, J.
(1976). Vocal tract normalization for /s/ and /∫/. Haskins Laboratories: Status Report on Speech Research, SR-48, 67-73.
17.
McGurk, H.
, & MacDonald, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264, 746-748.
18.
Mendoza-Denton, N.
, & Strand, E. A. (1998). Sociobiological ideologies of gender difference in phonetic research. Unpublished manuscript, The Ohio State University.
19.
Naslund, D. T.
(1993). The /s/ phoneme: A gender issue. Unpublished manuscript, University of Minnesota, Duluth.
20.
Peterson, G. E.
, & Barney, H. L. (1952). Control methods used in a study of vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 24, 174-184.
21.
Remez, R. E.
(1994). A guide to research on the perception of speech. In Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 145-172). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
22.
Schwartz, M.
(1968). Identification of speaker sex from isolated, voiceless fricatives. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 43(5), 1178-1179.
23.
Shadle, C. H.
(1991). The effect of geometry on source mechanisms of fricative consonants. Journal of Phonetics, 19, 409-424.
24.
Strand, E. A.
(1997, October). The role of gender stereotypes in speech perception. Paper presented at the NWAV(E) 26 meeting, Québec City, Québec.
25.
Strand, E. A.
, & K. Johnson. (1996). Gradient and visual speaker normalization in the perception of fricatives. In D. Gibbon (Ed.), Natural language processing and speech technology: Results of the 3rd KONVENS conference, Bielefeld, October 1996 (pp. 14-26). Berlin: Mouton.
26.
Taylor, S. E.
, Peplau, L. A., & Sears, D. O. (1994). Social psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
27.
van Bezooijen, R.
(1995). Sociocultural aspects of pitch differences between Japanese and Dutch women. Language and Speech, 38(3), 253-256.
28.
von Hippel, W.
, Sekaquaptewa, D., & Vargas, P. (1995). On the role of encoding processes in stereotype maintenance. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 177-254.
29.
Zebrowitz, L. A.
, & Montepare, J. M. (1992). Impressions of babyfaced individuals across the life span. Developmental Psychology, 28(6), 1143-1152.
