According to a theory devised by Bavelas and colleagues, equivocation occurs in response to avoidance-avoidance conflicts. This article argues that this theory provides a valuable conceptual framework for the analysis of news interviews; in addition, some modifications are discussed. It proposes that the concept of threats to face can be used to provide a theoretical underpinning for why avoidance-avoidance conflicts occur in the context of political interviews. It is further argued that different forms of equivocation have different interactional consequences, which is not adequately represented in Bavelas and colleagues' theory: For example, implicit replies can be shown to have significant interactional advantages over nonreplies. Finally, whereas Bavelas and colleagues conduct their analysis at the level of each individual question, in some circumstances, avoidance-avoidance conflicts may also operate at the level of the interview as a whole; both levels of analysis must be considered for fuller understanding ofpressures toward equivocation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bavelas, J. B.
, Black, A., Bryson, L., & Mullett, J. (1988). Political equivocation: A situational explanation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 7, 137-145.
2.
Bavelas, J. B.
, Black, A., Chovil, N., & Mullett, J. (1990). Equivocal communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
Beattie, G. W.
(1982). Turn-taking and interruptions in political interviews-Margaret Thatcher and Jim Callaghan compared and contrasted. Semiotica, 39, 93-114.
4.
Beattie, G. W.
(1989a). Interruptions in political interviews: A reply to Bull and Mayer. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 8, 327-339.
5.
Beattie, G. W.
(1989b). Interruptions in political interviews: The debate ends?Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 8, 345-348.
6.
Beattie, G. W.
, Cutler, A., & Pearson, M. (1982). Why is Mrs. Thatcher interrupted so often?Nature, 300, 744-747.
7.
Brown, P.
, & Levinson, S. C. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E. Goody (Ed.), Questions and politeness (pp. 56-310). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Brown, P.
, & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Bull, P E.
(1994). How to identify questions, replies and non-replies in political interviews. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13, 115-131.
10.
Bull, P E.
(1997). Queen of hearts or queen of the arts of implication? Implicit criticisms and their implications for equivocation theory in the interview between Martin Bashir and Diana, Princess of Wales. Social Psychological Review, 1, 27-36.
11.
Bull, P. E.
, & Elliott, J. (1994, September). Is John Major a major face-saver? Paper presented at the annual conference of the Social Psychology Section of the British Psychological Society.
12.
Bull, P E.
, Elliott, J., Palmer, D., & Walker, L. (1996). Why politicians are three-faced: The face model of political interviews. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 267-284.
13.
Bull, P E.
, & Mayer, K (1988). Interruptions in political interviews: Astudy of Margaret Thatcher and Neil Kinnock. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 7, 35-45.
14.
Bull, P E.
, & Mayer, K (1989). Interruptions in political interviews: A reply to Beattie. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 8, 341-344.
15.
Bull, P E.
, & Mayer, K. (1993). How not to answer questions in political interviews. Political Psychology, 14, 651-666.
16.
Clayman, S. E.
(1988). Displaying neutrality in television news interviews. Social Problems, 35, 474-492.
17.
Clayman, S. E.
(1989). The production of punctuality: Social interaction, temporal organization and social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 659-691.
18.
Clayman, S. E.
(1991). News interview openings: Aspects of sequential organization. In P. Scannell (Ed.), Broadcast talk (pp. 48-75). London: Sage.
19.
Clayman, S. E.
(1992). Footing in the achievement of neutrality: The case of news interview discourse. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work (pp. 163-198). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Goffman, E.
(1955). On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry, 18, 213-231. Reprinted in E. Goffman, Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face to Face Behaviour (1967, pp. 5-45). Garden City, NY: Anchor.
21.
Goffman, E.
(1981). Footing. In E. Goffman, Forms of talk (pp. 124-159). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
22.
Greatbatch, D. L.
(1986a). Aspects of topical organization in news interviews: The use of agenda-shifting procedures by interviewees. In R. Collins, J. Curran, N. Gamham, P. Scannell, P. Schlesinger, & C. Sparks (Eds.), Media, culture and society (pp. 441-455). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
23.
Greatbatch, D. L.
(1986b). Some standard uses of supplementary questions in news interviews. Belfast Working Papers in Language and Linguistics, 8, 86-123.
24.
Greatbatch, D. L.
(1988). A turn-taking system for British news interviews. Language in Society, 17, 401-430.
25.
Greatbatch, D. L.
(1992). On the management of disagreement between news interviewees. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work (pp. 268-301). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Harris, S.
(1986). Interviewers' questions in broadcast interviews. Belfast Working Papers in Language and Linguistics, 8, 50-85.
27.
Harris, S.
(1991). Evasive action: How politicians respond to questions in political interviews. In P. Scannell (Ed.), Broadcast talk (pp. 76-99). London: Sage.
28.
Heritage, J. C.
(1985). Analyzing news interviews: Aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience. In T. van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis (Vol. 3, pp. 95-117). New York: Academic Press.
29.
Heritage, J. C.
, Clayman, S. E., & Zimmerman, D. (1988). Discourse and message analysis: The micro-structure of mass media messages. In R. Hawkins, S. Pingree, & J. Weimann (Eds.), Advancing communication science: Merging mass and inter-personal processes (pp. 77-109). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30.
Heritage, J. C.
, & Greatbatch, D. L. (1991). On the institutional character of institutional talk: The case of news interviews. In D. Boden & D. Zimmerman (Eds.), Talk and social structure (pp. 93-137). Cambridge, MA: Polity.
31.
Jucker, J.
(1986). News interviews: A pragmalinguistic analysis. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Gieben.
32.
Pearson, B.
(1988). Power and politeness in conversation. Anthropological Linguistics, 30, 68-93.
33.
Quirk, R.
, Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
34.
Schegloff, E. A.
(1989). From interview to confrontation: Observations on the Bush/Rather encounter. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 22, 215-240.
35.
Iracy, K
(1990). The many faces of facework. In H. Giles & W R Robinson (Eds.), Handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 209-222). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
