Knowledge gained through symbolic and instrumental interpretations of attitudes toward persons with AIDS suggests that positive attitudes toward gays or persons with AIDS (symbolic factors) and less knowledge and greater fear ofAIDS contraction (instrumental factors) will lead to more convergence of self-disclosure outcomes in interactions with gays or persons withAIDS. The initial prediction, and the findings of the current investigation, are consistent with a communication accommodation theory prediction of greater convergence being related to greater liking or tolerance of an interaction partner's group membership. Finally, whereas the extant literature regarding whether more convergence should be evidenced in nonstigmatized, gay, or potentially HIV+ interactions was inconsistent, the current investigation found selfdisclosure convergence on privateness, emotional intensity, and social desirability across all interactions regardless of stigmatization condition. Convergence on uniqueness and vulnerability was most evidenced in the nonstigmatized condition.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Altman, I., Vinsel, A., & Brown, B. B. (1981). Dialectic conceptions in social psychology: An application to social penetration and privacy regulation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 107-160.
2.
Baxter, L. A. (1988). Adialectical perspective on communication strategies in relationship development. In S. W Duck (Ed.),A handbook ofpersonal relationships (pp. 257-273). New York: Wiley.
3.
Berg, J. H., & Archer, R. L. (1982). Responses to self-disclosure and interaction goals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 501-512.
4.
Burgoon, J. K, Dillman, L., & Stern, L. (1993). Adaptation in dyadic interaction: Defining and operationalizing patterns of reciprocity and compensation. Communication Theory, 3, 295-316.
5.
Burgoon, J. K, & Le Poire, B. A. (1993). Effects of communication expectancies, actual communication, and expectancy disconfirmation on evaluations of communicators and their communication behavior. Human Communication Research, 20, 67-96.
6.
Burgoon, J. K, Le Poire, B. A., & Rosenthal, R. (1995). Effects of preinteraction expectancies and target communication on perceiver reciprocity and compensation in dyadic interaction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 287-321.
7.
Chaiken, A. L., & Derlega, V J. (1974). Self-disclosure. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
8.
Collins, C. L., & Gould, O. N. (1994). Getting to know you: How own age and other's age relate to self-disclosure. International Journal ofAging and Human Development, 39, 55-66.
9.
Coupland, N., Coupland, J., & Giles, H. (1991). Language, society, & the elderly. Oxford: Blackwell.
10.
Coupland, N., Coupland, J., Giles, H., & Henwood, K (1988). Accommodating the elderly: Invoking and extending a theory. Language in Society, 17, 1-42.
11.
Cronen, V. E., Chen, V., & Pearce, W B. (1988). Coordinated management of meaning: A critical theory. In Y Y. Kim & W B. Gudykunst (Eds.), Theories in intercultural communication (pp. 66-98). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12.
Derlega, V. J., Metts, S., Petronio, S., & Margulis, S. T. (1993). Self-disclosure. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
13.
Dindia, K (1982). Reciprocity of self-disclosure: A sequential analysis. In M. Burgoon (Ed.), Communication yearbook 6 (pp. 506-528). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
14.
Dindia, K (1988). A comparison of several statistical tests of reciprocity of self-disclosure. Communication Research, 15, 726-752.
15.
Gallois, C., Giles, H., Jones, E., Cargile, C. A., & Ota, H. (1995). Accommodating intercultural encounters: Elaborations and extensions. In R. L. Wiseman (Ed.), Intercultural communication theory (pp. 115-147). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
16.
Gilbert, S. J., & Whiteneck, G. G. (1976). Toward a multidimensional approach to the study of self-disclosure. Human Communication Research, 2, 347-356.
17.
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
18.
Herek, G. M. (1984). Beyond homophobia: A social psychological perspective on attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. Journal of Homosexuality, 10, 1-21.
19.
Herek, G. M., & Glunt, E. K (1988). An epidemic of stigma: Public reactions to AIDS. American Psychologist, 43, 886-891.
20.
Holtgraves, T. (1990). The language of self-disclosure. In H. Giles & W P. Robinson (Eds.), Handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 191-207). New York: Wiley.
21.
Johnson, S. D. (1987). Factors related to intolerance of AIDS victims. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 26, 105-110.
22.
Jourard, S. M. (1959). Self-disclosure and other cathexis. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 59, 428-431.
23.
Jourard, S. M. (1964). The transparent self. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
24.
Jourard, S. M., & Landsman, M. J. (1960). Cognition, cathexis, and the "dyadic effect" in men's self-disclosing behavior. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 6, 178-186.
25.
Kelly, J. A., St. Lawrence, J. S., Smith, S., Hood, H. V., & Cook, D. J. (1987). Stigmatization of AIDS patients by physicians. American Journal of Public Health, 77, 789-791.
26.
Le Poire, B. A. (1994). Attraction toward and nonverbal stigmatization of gay males and person with AIDS: Evidence of symbolic over instrumental attribution structures. Human Communication Research, 21, 241-279.
27.
Le Poire, B. A., Sigelman, C., Sigelman, L., & Kenski, H. C. (1990). Who wants to quarantine persons with AIDS?Social Science Quarterly, 71, 239-249.
28.
Meleshko, K. G., & Alden, L. E. (1993). Anxiety and self-disclosure: Toward a motivation model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 1000-1009.
29.
Miller, L. C., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). Reciprocity of self-disclosure at the individual and dyadic levels: A social relations analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 713-719.
30.
Morton, T. L. (1978). Intimacy and reciprocity of exchange: A comparison of spouses and strangers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 72-81.
31.
O'Donnell, L., O'Donnell, C. R., Pleck, J. H., Snarey, J., & Rose, R. M. (1987). Psychosocial responses of hospital workers to acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS). Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17, 269-285.
32.
Pittam, J., & Gallois, C. (1996). The mediating role of narrative in intergroup processes: Talking about AIDS. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15, 312-334.
33.
Pollock, P. H., Lilie, S. A., & Vittes, M. E. (1993). On the nature and dynamics of social construction: The case of AIDS. Social Science Quarterly, 74, 123-135.
34.
Pryor,J. B., & Reeder, G. D. (1993). Collective and individual representations of HIV/AIDS stigma. In J. B. Pryor & G. D. Reeder (Eds.), The social psychology of HIV infection (pp. 263-286). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35.
Pryor, J. B., Reeder, G. D., & McManus, J. A. (1991). Fear and loathing in the workplace: Reactions to AIDS-infected coworkers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 133-139.
36.
Pryor, J. B., Reeder, G. D.,Vinacco, R., & Kott, T. L. (1989). The instrumental and symbolic functions of attitudes toward persons with AIDS. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19,377-404.
37.
Sniderman, P. M.,Wolfinger, B. K., Mutz, D. E., & Wiley, J. E. (1989). Values underpressure: AIDS and civil liberties. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University.
38.
Stiles, W B. (1978). Verbal response modes and dimensions of interpersonal roles: A method of discourse analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 693-703.
39.
Thompson, T. L., & Seibold, D. R. (1978). Stigma management in normal-stigmatized interactions: Test of the disclosure hypothesis and a model of stigma acceptance. Human Communication Research, 4, 231-242.
40.
Wetzel, C. G., & Wright-Buckley, C. (1988). Reciprocity of self-disclosure: Breakdowns of trust in cross-racial dyads. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 9, 277-288.
