This study examines two aspects of conversational behavior that might lead to high perceived social influence in newly formed discussion groups, namely, to gain speaking turns by interrupting others and, conversely, to retain speakership against others' interruptions. Subjects discussed the issue of euthanasia and afterward ranked their own and each other's influence. Relative to low-ranking members, high-ranking members were more successful in interrupting others and in gaining speaking turns by other, noninterruptive means. When being interrupted, high-ranking members were better able to maintain the floor. However, the former also yielded to interruptions more frequently, probably because of the larger number of overall interruptions they received. Further analysis showed that certain speech acts (dissent, offer, reply) were more strongly associated than others (consent, reaction, request) with the successful enactment of interruptions and that, contrary to stereotypic beliefs, interruptions were not always disruptive but couldfunction constructively in rescuingandpromotinggroup discussion.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Austin, J.
(1962). How to do things with words. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
2.
Bales, R. F.
(1956). Task status and likeability as a function of talking and listening in decision making groups. In L. D. White (Ed.), The state of the social sciences (pp. 148-161). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
Brooke, M. E.
, & Ng, S. H. (1986). Language and social influence in small conversational groups. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 5, 201-210.
4.
Brown, R.
(1965). Social psychology. London: Macmillan.
5.
Bull, P.
, & Mayer, K. (1988). Interruptions in political interviews: A study of Margaret Thatcher and Neil Kinnock. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 7, 35-45.
6.
Button, G.
, & Lee, J.R.E. (1987). Transcript symbols. In G. Button & J.R.E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organisation (pp. 9-17). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
7.
Clark, H. H.
(1985). Language use and language users. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., pp. 179-231). New York: Harper & Row.
8.
Coates, J.
(1988). Gossip revisited: Language in all-female groups. In J. Coates & D. Cameron (Eds.), Women in their speech communities: New perspectives on language and sex (pp. 94-122). London: Longman.
9.
Dunne, M.
, & Ng, S. H. (1994). Simultaneous speech in small group conversation: All-together-now and one-at-a-time?Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13, 45-71.
10.
Edelsky, C.
, & Adams, K. (1990). Creating inequality: Breaking the rules in debates. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 9, 171-190.
11.
Fairclough, N.
(1989). Language and power. London: Longman.
12.
Fowler, R.
(1985). Power. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis: Discourse analysis in society (pp. 61-82). London: Academic Press.
13.
French, P.
, & Local, J. (1983). Turn-competitive incomings. Journal of Pragmatics, 7, 17-38.
14.
Halliday, M.A.K.
(1976). System and function in language (G. Kress, Ed.). London: Oxford University Press.
15.
Hogg, M. A.
(in press). Social identity, self-categorization, and the small group. In E. H. Witte & J. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behaviour, Vol. 2: Small group processes and interpersonal relations. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
Hollander, E. P.
(1985). Leadership and power. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 485-537). New York: Random House.
17.
James, D.
, & Clarke, S. (1992). Interruptions, gender, and power: A review of the literature. In K Hall, M. Bucholtz, & B. Moonwoman (Eds.), Locating power: Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Women and Language Conference (Vol. 1, pp. 286-299). Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley Women and Language Group.
18.
Lewis-Beck, M. S.
(1990). Applied regression:An introduction. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19.
Mullen, B.
, Salas, E., & Driskell, J. E. (1989). Salience, motivation, and artifact as contributions to the relation between participation rate and leadership. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 545-559.
20.
Ng, S. H.
(1990). Language and control. In H. Giles & P. W Robinson (Eds.), Handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 271-285). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
21.
Ng, S. H.
, Bell, D., & Brooke, M. (1993). Gaining turns and achieving high influence ranking in small conversational groups. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 265-275.
22.
Ng, S. H.
, & Bradac, J. J. (1993). Power in language. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
23.
Parker, K.C.H.
(1988). Speaking turns in small group interaction: A context-sensitive event sequence model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 965-971.
24.
Roger, D.
(1989). Experimental studies of turn-taking behaviour. In D. Roger & P. Bull (Eds.), Conversation:An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 75-95). Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
25.
Roger, D.
, Bull, P., & Smith, S. (1988). The development of a comprehensive system for classifying interruptions. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 7, 27-34.
26.
Sacks, H.
, Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.
27.
Stasser, G.
, & Taylor, L. A. (1991). Speaking turns in face-to-face discussions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 675-684.
28.
Swann, J.
(1988). Talk control: An illustration from the classroom of problems in analysing male dominance of conversation. In J. Coates & D. Cameron (Eds.), Women in their speech communities: New perspectives on language and sex (pp. 123-140). London: Longman.
29.
Thomas, A. P.
, Bull, R., & Roger, D. (1982). Conversation exchange analysis. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 3, 141-155.
30.
Thomas, A. R.
, Roger, D., & Bull, P. (1983). A sequential analysis of informal dyadic conversation using Markov chains. British Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 177-188.
31.
Wiemann, J. M.
(1985). Interpersonal control and regulation in conversation. In R. L. Street, Jr. & J. N. Cappella (Eds.), Sequence and pattern in communicative behavior (pp. 85-102). London: Edward Arnold.
32.
Zimmerman, D. H.
, & West, C. (1975). Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation. In B. Thorne & N. Henley (Eds.), Language and sex: Difference and dominance (pp. 105-129). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
