The Brown-Levinson (1987) theory of politeness has attracted a great deal of attention from a variety of disciplines. However, the lack of systematic methods for assessing discourse in terms of politeness has hampered the evaluation and development of the theory and the comparison of findings from different studies. The authors present a proposal that attempts to address some of the limitations of previous approaches and to extend their application to facework. The authors describe a theme for conceptualizing facework in discourse based on an ethogenic hierarchical analysis of action sequences in social episodes. From that scheme a procedure is derived for coding discourse in terms of its functions with respect to the face of speakers and hearers. The procedure is illustrated with examples from a research project on the use of facework in letters of appeal in an academic context.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Austin, J. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon.
2.
Blum-Kulka, S. (1987). Indirectness and politeness in requests: Same or different?Journal of Pragmatics, 11, 131-146.
3.
Brown, R., & Gilman, A. (1989). Politeness theory and Shakespeare's four major tragedies. Language in Society, 18, 159-212.
4.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Cherry, R. D. (1988). Politeness in written persuasion. Journal of Pragmatics, 12, 63-82.
6.
Craig, R. T., Tracy, K, & Spisak, F. (1986). The discourse of requests: Assessment of a politeness approach. Human Communication Research, 12, 437-468.
7.
Farquharson, M. (1989). The social act of complaining: An analysis of politeness. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
8.
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual. New York: Anchor.
9.
Harre, R. (1974). Blueprint for a new science. In N. Armistead (Ed.), Reconstructing social psychology (pp. 240-259). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
10.
Harre, R. (1979). Social being. Oxford: Blackwell.
11.
Harre, R., & Secord, P F. (1972). The explanation of social behaviour. Oxford: Blackwell.
12.
Harre, R., & van Langenhove, L. (1991). Varieties of positioning. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 21, 394-407.
13.
Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
14.
Holmes, J. (1984). Modifying illocutionary force. Journal of Pragmatics, 8, 345-365.
15.
House, J. (1989). Politeness in English and German: The functions of Please and Bitte. In S. Blum-Kulka, J. House, & G. Kasper (Eds.), Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies (pp. 96-119). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
16.
House, J., & Kasper, G. (1981). Politeness markers in English and German. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), Conversational routine: Explorations in standardized communication situations and prepatterned speech (pp. 157-185). The Hague: Mouton.
17.
Kroger, R. O. (1982). Explorations in ethogeny: With special reference to the rules of address. American Psychologist, 37, 810-820.
18.
Kroger, R. O. (1988). The social nature of hypnosis: An ethogenic analysis of hypnotic pain reduction. New Ideas in Psychology, 6, 47-66.
19.
Kroger, R. O. (1994). The Catholic confession and everyday self-disclosure. In J. Siegfried (Ed.), The status of common sense in psychology (pp. 54-67). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
20.
Kroger, R. O., & Wood, L. A. (1983). Ethogeny, social identity and suicide. In T. R. Sarbin & K. E. Scheibe (Eds.), Studies in social identity (pp. 71-91). New York: Praeger.
21.
Lakoff, R. T. (1973). The logic of politeness; Or, minding your p's and q's. In C. Corum, T. C. Smith-Stark, & A. Weiser (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 292-305). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. New York: Longman.
23.
Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Metts, S., & Bryan, G. (1984). Politeness: A conversational indicator of sex roles. Paper presented at the meeting of the Central States Speech Association Convention, Chicago. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 246500.)
25.
Myers, G. (1989). The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied Linguistics, 10, 1-35.
26.
Penman, R. (1990). Facework and politeness: Multiple goals in courtroom discourse. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 9, 15-38.
27.
Peters, R. S. (1960). The concept of motivation. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
28.
Sbisa, M. (1992). [Review of Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies]. Journal of Pragmatics, 17, 267-274.
29.
Shimanoff, S. B. (1977). Investigating politeness. In E. O. Keenan & T. L. Bennett (Eds.), Discourse across time and space. Los Angeles: University of Southern California.
30.
Tracy, K. (1990). The many faces of facework. In H. Giles & W P. Robinson (Eds.), Handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 209-226). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
31.
Whitney, D. (1991). "Women's" or "powerless" language in conversation: Gender, status and attributional consequences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
32.
Wood, L. A., & Kroger, R. O. (1989, August). Analyzing the politeness of discourse. Paper presented at the First International Conference on Understanding Language Use in Everyday Life, Calgary, Canada.
33.
Wood, L. A., & Kroger, R. O. (1991). Politeness and forms of address. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 10, 145-168.
34.
Wood, L. A., Kroger, R. O., & Arrowood, A. J. (1989). Problem-solving in communication. Unpublished research report, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
