Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This prologue to the special issue points to the diversity in research and theory on the communication of emotion and its relation to culture and to social power. Part of this diversity results from the fact that scholars work at different levels of analysis, concentrating on different aspects of emotion and its communication, and often paying little attention to the importance of other levels. In addition, there is not agreement on what counts as an emotion, on the concept of culture, or on the definition of display rules. Finally, the role of social status or power has been very infrequently invoked in studies of emotion and its communication. The articles in this issue present diverse perspectives of the impact of power and culture on the communication of emotion. They also highlight contentious issues in the study of emotion. At the same time, they serve to widen our understanding of this central area in social life.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Argyle, M. , Furnham, A. , & Graham, J.-A. (1981). Social situations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ekman, P. (1972). Universal and cultural differences in facial expressions of emotion. In J. Cole (Ed.). Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 19, pp. 207-283). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

Ekman, P. (Ed.). (1982). Emotion in the human face (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Forgas, J. P. (Ed.). (1991). Emotion and social judgements. London: Pergamon.

Frijda,, N. H. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge:.Cambridge University Press.

Gallois, C. (1993). The language and communication of emotion: Interpersonal, inter-group, or universal? American Behavioral Scientist, 36, 309-338.

Gumperz, D. M. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hall, E. T. (1966). The hidden dimension. Garden City, NY: Anchor/Doubleday.

Hall, J. A. (1984). Nonverbal sex differences: Communication accuracy and expressive style. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

10.

Henley, N. , & Kramarae. C. (1991). Gender, power, and miscommunication. In N. Coupland , H. Giles & J. M. Wiemann (Eds.), "Miscommunication" and problematic talk. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

11.

Holmes, J. (1985). Sex differences and mis-communication-Some data from New Zealand. In J. B. Pride (Ed.), Cross-cultural encounters: Communication and mis-communication. Melbourne: River Seine.

12.

Johnson-Laird, P. N. , & Oatley, K. (1989). The language of emotions: An analysis of a semantic field. Cognition and Emotion, 3, 81-123.

13.

Mehrabian, A. (1972). Nonverbal communication. Chicago and New York: Aldine-Atherton.

14.

Osgood, C. E. , Suci, G: J. , & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

15.

Russell, J. A. (1991). In defence of a prototype approach to emotion concepts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 37-47.

16.

Scherer, K. R. (Ed.). (1988). Facets of emotion. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

17.

Scherer, K. R. , & Ekman, P. (Eds.). (1982). Handbook of methods in nonverbal behavior research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

18.

Shimoda, K. , Argyle, M. , & Ricci-Bitti, P. (1978). The intercultural recognition of emotional expression by their national groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 169-179.

19.

Tannen, D. (1986). That's not what I meant! New York: Ballantine.

Prologue

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References