The present paper is concerned with the knowledge or cognitive representations which individuals must possess in order to understand utterances occurring in conversations. We examined Brown and Levinson's (1978) model which reconciles the Cooperative Principle of Grice (1975) with the face-wants of conversational interactants by relativising the operation of abstract principles of conversation to aspects of the social relationship between the speaker and hearer. In an empirical study of ironic sarcasm and banter, Brown and Levinson's model is found to require an additional relationship parameter, ‘relationship affect’, to account for the ways in which neutral observers interpret counter-to-fact insults and compliments. As predicted, the literal meanings of utterances are also found to influence observers' cognitive representations of the relationship between speaker and hearer. However, unexpected correlations among the relationship variables suggest that the model's additivity assumption may need to be relinquished.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alkire, A. A., Collum, M. E., Kaswan, J. and Love, L. (1968) Information exchange and accuracy of verbal communication under social power conditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 301–8.
2.
Asch, S. E. (1948) The doctrine of suggestion, prestige and imitation in social psychology. Psychological Review, 55, 250–77.
3.
Austin, J. L. (1962) How to Do Things with Words.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
Baxter, L. A. (1984) An investigation of compliance gaining as politeness. Human Communication Research, 10, 427–56.
5.
Booth, W. C. (1974) A Rhetoric of Irony.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6.
Brown, P. and Levinson, S. (1978) Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E. N. Goody (ed.) Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Clark H. H. (1985) Language use and languge users. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (eds) The Handbook of Social Psychology, 3rd edn, vol. 2. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
8.
Clark, H. H. and Gerrig, R. J. (1984) On the pretence theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 121–26.
9.
Clark, H. H. and Schunk, D. (1980) Polite responses to polite requests. Cognition, 8, 111–43.
10.
Cody, M., McLaughlin, M. and Schneider, M. (1981) The impact of relational consequences and intimacy on the selection of inter-personal persuasion tactics: A reanalysis. Communication Quarterly, 29, 91–106.
11.
Cohen, J. and Cohen, P. (1975) Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences.Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
Davis, D. and Holtgraves, T. (1984) Perceptions of unresponsive others: Attributions, attraction, understandability, and memory for their utterances. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 383–408.
13.
Falbo, T. and Peplau, L. A. (1980) Power strategies in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 618–28.
14.
Gazdar, G. (1979) Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition, and Logical Form.New York: Academic Press.
15.
Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (1984) Literal meaning and psychological theory. Cognitive Science, 4, 275–304.
16.
Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (1986) On the psycholinguistics of sarcasm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 3–15.
17.
Goffman, E. (1971) Relations in Public.New York: Basic Books.
18.
Goffman, E. (1976) Replies and responses. Language in Society, 5, 257–313.
19.
Grice, H. P. (1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (eds) Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3. Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press.
20.
Higgins, E. T. (1981) The communication game: Implications for social cognition and persuasion. In E. T. Higgins, C. Herman & M. Zanna (eds) Social Cognition: The Ontario Symposium, vol. 1. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
Higgins, E. T. and Bargh, J. A. (1987) Social cognition and social perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 358–410.
22.
Holtgraves, T. (1986) Language structure in social interaction: Perceptions of direct and indirect speech acts and interactants who use them. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 305–14.
23.
Jorgenson, J., Miller, G. and Sperber, D. (1984) Test of the mention theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 112–20.
24.
Kemper, S. and Thissen, D. (1981) Memory for the dimensions of requests. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 552–63.
25.
Kempson, R. (1975) Presupposition and the Delimitation of Semantics.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Knowles, P. L. and Smith D. L. (1982) The ecological perspective applied to social perception: Revision of a working paper.Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 12, 53–78.
27.
Lakoff, R. (1973) The logic of politeness: Or minding your P's and Q's. Chicago Linguistics Society, 9, 292–305
28.
Larkin, D. and O'Malley, M. H. (1973) Declarative sentences and the rule-of-conversation hypothesis. Chicago Linguistics Society, 9, 306–19.
29.
Leech, G. N. (1983) Principles of Pragmatics.London: Longman.
30.
Lustig, M. W. and King, S. (1980) The effects of communication apprehension and situation of communication on strategy choice. Human Communication Research, 7, 74–82.
31.
Premo, B. E. and Stiles, W. B. (1983) Familiarity in verbal interactions of married couples versus strangers. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1, 209–30.
32.
Searle, J. R. (1969) Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Slugoski, B. R. (1984) Logic versus politeness in dyadic conversations. In P. Leonardi & V. D'Urso (eds) Discourse Analysis and Natural Rhetorics.Padua: Cleup Editore.
34.
Smith, P. M., Giles, H. and Hewstone, M. (1980) Sociolinguistics: A social psychological perspective. In R. St Clair & H. Giles (eds) The Social and Psychological Context of Language.Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35.
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (1981) Irony and the use-mention distinction. In P. Cole (ed.) Radical Pragmatics.New York: Academic Press.
36.
Triandis, H. C., Vassilou, V. and Nassiakou, M. (1968) Three cross-cultural studies of subjective culture. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Monograph Supplement, 8, 1–42.
37.
Turnbull, W. (1986) Everyday explanation: The pragmatics of puzzle-resolution. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 16, 141–60.
38.
Turnbull, W. and Slugoski, B. R. (1988) Conversational and linguistic processes in causal attribution. In D. J. Hilton (ed.) Contemporary Science and Natural Explanation: Commonsense Conceptions of Causality.Brighton and New York: Harvester Press.
39.
Turnbull, W. and Smith, E. E. (1986) Attribution and conversation: Comprehending uncooperative question-answer exchanges. Submitted for publication.
40.
Williams, J. P. (1984) Does mention (or pretence) exhaust the concept of irony?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 127–29.
41.
Wish, M., Deutsch, M. and Kaplan, S. J. (1976) Perceived dimensions of interpersonal behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 409–20.
