To explore how social actors find fault with others' conduct, transcripts of 84 problematic events were analysed. The depiction of fault-finding methods that emerged differs from earlier research in stressing the extensiveness and negotiability of action in problematic events. A larger number of fault-finding methods, which pertain to present and future, in addition to past faults, are included within the domain of fault finding. The process of finding fault is characterised as an active, interpretive, negotiative process. Included in the process are formulations of events as problematic, accusations, explanation demands, stops, explanations of stops, and advisories. Excerpts of talk are provided to exemplify each of these methods, and the within-category variation and co-occurrence of methods are explored. Limitations of the study and several prospects for future work are mentioned.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Austin, J. L. (1961) How to Do Things with Words.Oxford: Clarendon.
2.
Beach, W. A. (1985) Temporal density in courtroom interaction: Constraints on the recovery of past events in legal discourse. Communication Monographs, 52, 1–18.
3.
Buttny, R. (1987) Sequence and practical reasoning in accounts episodes. Communication Quarterly, 35, 67–83.
4.
Buttny, R. and Lannamann, J. W. (1986) Framing problems: The hierarchical organization of discourse in a family therapy session. Unpublished manuscript.
5.
Cody, M. J. and McLaughlin, M. L. (1985) Models for the sequential construction of accounting episodes: Situational and interactional constraints on message selection and evaluation. In R. L. Street, Jr. and J. N. Cappella (eds) Sequence and Pattern in Communicative Behaviour.London: Edward Arnold.
6.
Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research.Chicago: Aldine.
7.
Goffman, E. (1967) Interaction Ritual. Garden City: Anchor.
8.
Goffman, E. (1971) Relations in Public.New York: Harper and Row.
9.
Goodwin, M. H. (1982) Processes of dispute management among urban black children. American Ethnologist, 9, 76–96.
10.
Harré, R. and Secord, P. F. (1973) The Explanation of Social Behaviour.Totowa, NJ: Littlefield, Adams.
11.
Hewitt, J. P. (1984) Self and Society: A Symbolic Interactionist Social Psychology.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
12.
Hewitt, J. P. and Hall, P. M. (1973) Social problems, problematic situations and quasi-theories. American Sociological Review, 38, 367–74.
13.
Hewitt, J. P. and Stokes, R. (1975) Disclaimers. American Sociological Review, 40, 1–11.
14.
Hopper, R. (1981) The taken for granted. Human Communication Research, 7, 195–211.
15.
Labov, W. (1972) The study of language in its social context. In P. Giglioli (ed.) Language and Social Context.New York: Penguin.
16.
Maynard, D. W. (1985) How children start arguments. Language in Society, 14, 1–30.
17.
McHugh, P. (1968) Defining the Situation: The Organization of Meaning in Social Interaction. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
18.
McKinlay, A. and Potter, J. (1987) Model discourse: Interpretative repertoires in scientists' conference talk. Social Studies of Science, 17, 443–63.
19.
McLaughlin, M. L. (1984) How Talk is Organized.Beverly Hills: Sage.
20.
McLaughlin, M. L., Cody, M. J. and O'Hair, H. D. (1983) The management of failure events: Some contextual determinants of accounting behaviour. Human Communication Research, 9, 208–24.
21.
McLaughlin, M. L., Cody, M. J. and Rosenstein, N. E. (1983) Account sequences in conversations between strangers. Communication Monographs, 50, 102–25.
22.
Mills, C. W. (1940) Situated actions and vocabularies of motive. American Sociological Review, 5, 904–13.
23.
Moerman, M. (1972) Analysis of live conversation: providing accounts, finding breaches, taking sides. In D. Sudnow (ed.) Studies in Social Interaction.New York: Free Press.
24.
Morris, G. H. (1978) The remedial process as a negotiation of rules. Unpublished Masters thesis, University of Texas.
25.
Morris, G. H. (1985) The remedial episode as a negotiation of rules. In R. L. Street, Jr. and J. N. Cappella (eds) Sequence and Pattern in Communicative Behaviour, London: Edward Arnold.
26.
Morris, G. H. and Hopper, R. (1980) Remediation and legislation in everyday talk: How communicators achieve consensus. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 66, 266–74.
27.
Morris, G. H. and Hopper, R. (1987) Symbolic action as alignment. Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 21, 1–21.
28.
Morris, G. H., Coursey, M. L. and Thach, E. (1987) Formulations in fact-finding interviews. Communication Research Reports, 4, 65–70.
29.
Pomerantz, A. (1987) Attributions of responsibility: Blamings. Sociology, 12, 266–74.
30.
Ragan, S. L. and Hopper, R. (1981) Alignment talk in the job interview. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 9, 85–103.
31.
Sabini, J. and Silver, M. (1982) Moralities of Everyday Life.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32.
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G. and Sacks, H. (1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361–82.
33.
Schonbach, P. (1980) A category system for account phases. European Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 195–200.
34.
Schonbach, P. (1987) A theory of escalation in account sequences. Presented to the Third International Conference on Social Psychology and Language, Bristol.
35.
Scott, M. and Lyman, S. (1968) Accounts. American Sociological Review, 22, 46–62.
36.
Semin, G. R. and Manstead, A. S. R. (1983) The Accountability of Conduct: A Social Psychological Analysis.New York: Academic Press.
37.
Stokes, R. and Hewitt, J. (1976) Aligning actions. American Sociological Review, 41, 838–49.
