This study argues that situations can be conceptualised according to actors' prototypes (Cantor & Mischel, 1979a, b) for obtaining goals. In addition, these goals are constructed from salient dimensions of perceptions found in previous literature on compliance-gaining. Fourteen goal types were selected and used in a study concerning perceptions of influence situations and expected use of influence approaches. Perceptions and influence strategies varied from one goal to another, and Locus of Control constructs (i.e. internal locus of control, power-lessness) were also significantly related to participants' reactions. Internals (vs. externals) claimed greater confidence when pursuing goals, reported greater persistence when pursuing goals, rated goals as easier to imagine, and reported greater willingness to enter into events to achieve the various goals. Internals were also more likely than externals to rely on rationality, referent power, and manipulation of positive feelings. Powerless actors, however, opted for weaker strategies (e.g. direct requests, compromise), more rudimentary strategies (coercive power), and more emotional-based strategies (manipulation of positive feelings, manipulation of negative feelings).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baxter, L. A. and Bullis, C. (1986) Turning points in developing romantic relationships. Human Communication Research, 12, 469–95.
2.
Berger, C. R. (1986) Planning and scheming: Strategies for initiating relationships. In P. McGhee, R. Burnett and D. Clarke (eds), Social Representations of Interpersonal Links. London: Metheun.
3.
Brandstratter, H. (1983) Emotional responses to other persons in everyday life situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 871–83.
4.
Burgenthal, D. P., Henker, B. and Whalen, C. K. (1976) Attributional antecedents of verbal and vocal assertiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 405–11.
5.
Cantor, N. and Mischel, W. (1977) Traits as prototypes: Effects on recognition memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 38–48.
6.
Cantor, N. and Mischel, W. (1979a) Prototypes in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Volume 12, pp. 4–52. New York: Academic Press.
7.
Cantor, N. and Mischel, W. (1979b) Prototypicality and personality: Effects of free recall and personality impressions. Journal of Research in Personality, 13, 187–205.
8.
Cantor, N., Mischel, W. and Schwartz, J. (1982) A prototype analysis of psychological situations. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 45–77.
9.
Cody, M. J., Canary, D. J. and Smith, S. W. (1987) Compliance-gaining goals and episodes. In J. Daly & J. Wiemann (eds), Communicating Strategically. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10.
Cody, M. J., Greene, J. O., Marston, P. J., Baaske, K. T., O'Hair, D. and Schneider, M. J. (1986) Situation perception and the selection of message strategies. In M. L. McLaughlin (ed.), Communication Yearbook, 9, pp. 390–420. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
11.
Cody, M. J. and McLaughlin, M. L. (1980) Perceptions of compliance-gaining situations: A dimensional analysis. Communication Monographs, 47,132–48.
12.
Cody, M. J. and McLaughlin, M. L. (1985) The situation as a construct in interpersonal communication research. In M. L. Knapp and G. R. Miller (eds), Handbook of Interpersonal Communication, pp. 263–312. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
13.
Cody, M. J., McLaughlin, M. L. and Schneider, H. D. (1981) The impact of intimacy and relational consequences on the selection of interpersonal persuasion tactics: A re-analysis. Communication Quarterly, 29,91–106.
14.
Cody, M. J., Smith, S. W., Lee, W., and Greene, J. O. (1986) Self-Monitoring, Gender, and Social Influence. Paper presented at the Speech Communication Association convention, Chicago. November.
15.
Cody, M. J., Woelfel, M. L. and Jordon, W. J. (1983) Dimensions of compliance-gaining situations. Human Communication Research, 9, 99–113.
16.
Davis, W. L. and Phares, E. J. (1967) Internal-external control as a determinant of information-seeking in a social influence situation. Journal of Personality, 35, 547–61.
17.
Dillard, J. P. and Burgoon, M. (1985) Situational influences on the selection of compliancegaining messages: Two tests of the predictive validity of the Cody-McLaughlin typology. Communication Monograplis, 52, 289–304.
18.
Doherty, W. J. and Ryder, R. G. (1979) Locus of control, interpersonal trust, and assertive behavior among newlyweds. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2212–39.
19.
Endler, N. (1986) Origins of interactional psychology. In A. Furnham (ed.), Social Behaviour in Context, pp. 11–48. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
20.
Forgås, J. P. (1979) Social Episodes: The Study of Interaction Routines.New York: Academic Press.
21.
Forgås, J. P. (1982) Episode cognition: Internal representations of interaction routines. In L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. New York: Academic Press.
22.
Forgås, J. P. (1983a) Social skills and the perception of interaction episodes. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 22, 195–207.
23.
Forgås, J. P. (1983b) Language, goals, and situations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 2, 267–93.
24.
Goodstadt, B. E. and Hjelle, L. A. (1973) Power to the powerless: Locus of control and the use of power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27,190–96.
25.
Goodstadt, B. E. and Kipnis, D. (1970) Situational influences on the use of power. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54, 201–207.
26.
Hunter, J. H., Gerbing, D. W. and Boster, F. J. (1982) Machiavellian beliefs and personality: Construct invalidity of the Machiavellianism dimension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1293–1305.
27.
Jones, E. E. and Pittman, T. S. (1982). Toward a general theory of strategic self-presentation. In J. Suls (ed.), Psychological Perspectives on the Self, vol 1, pp. 231–61. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28.
Kipnis, D. (1984) The use of power in organizations and in interpersonal settings. In S. Oskamp (ed.), Applied Social Psychology Annual No. 5, pp. 179–210. Beverly Hills: Sage.
29.
Kipnis, D. and Lane, W. P. (1962) Self-confidence and leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 46, 291–95.
30.
Lefcourt, H. M. (1982) Locus of Control: Current Trends in Theory and Research (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
31.
Lefcourt, H. M., Martin, R. A., Fick, C. M. and Saleh, W. E. (1985) Locus of control for affiliation and behavior in social interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 755–59.
32.
Saleh, W. E. (1976) Multidimensional locus of control in sociopolitical activities of conservative and liberal ideologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 199–208.
33.
McLaughlin, M. L., Cody, M. J. and Robey, C. S. (1980) Situational influences on the selection of strategies to resist compliance-gaining tactics. Human Communication Research, 7, 14–36.
34.
McLaughlin, M. L., Louden, A. D., Cashion, J. L., Altendorf, D. M., Baaske, K. T. and Smith, S. W. (1985) Conversational planning and self-serving utterances: The manipulation of topical and functional structures in dyadic interaction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 4, 233–51.
35.
Meyer, J. R. (1986) Interpersonal Situation Schemata and Message Design. Paper presented at the Speech Communication Association convention, Chicago. November.
36.
Miller, P. C., Lefcourt, H. M., Holmes, J. G., Ware, E. E. and Saleh, W. E. (1986) Maritial locus of control and marital problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 161–69.
37.
Niedenthal, P. M., Cantor, N. and Kihlstrom, J. F. (1985) Prototype matching: A strategy for social decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 575–84.
38.
Pervin, L. A. (1986) Personal and social determinants of behavior in situations. In A. Furnham (ed.), Social Behavior in Context. Newton, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
39.
Price, R. H. and Bouffard, D. L. (1974) Behavioral appropriateness and situational constraint as dimensions of social behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 579–86.
40.
Rosch, E. (1975) Cognitive reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 532–47.
41.
Rosch, E. (1978) Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (ed.), Cognition and Categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
42.
Rule, B. G. and Bisanz, G. L. (in press) Goals and strategies of persuasion: A cognitive schema. In M. Zanna, P. Herman & J. Olson (eds), Social Influence: The Fifth Ontario Symposium in Personality and Social Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
43.
Rule, B. G., Bisanz, G. L. and Kohn, M. (1985) Anatomy of a persuasion schema: Targets, goals and strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1127–40.
44.
Schank, R. and Abelson, R. (1977) Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
45.
Schilit, W. K. and Locke, E. A. (1982) A study of upward influence in organizations. Adminstrative Science Quarterly, 27, 304–16.
46.
Sillars, A. L. (1980) Attribution and communication in roommate conflicts. Communication Monographs, 47, 180–200.
47.
Snyder, M. (1983) The influence of individuals on situations: Implications for understanding the links between personality and social behavior. Journal of Personality, 51, 497–516.
48.
Stewart, R. A., Kearney, P. and Plax,T. G. (1986) Locus of control as a mediator: A study of college students' reactions to teachers' attempts to gain compliance. In M. L. McLaughlin (ed.), Communication Yearbook, 39, pp. 691–704. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
49.
Tversky, B. and Hemenway, K. (1983) Categories of environmental scenes. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 121–50.
50.
Trzebinski, J. (1985) Action-oriented representations of implicit personality theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1266–78.
51.
Wheeless, L. R., Barraclough, R. and Stewart, R. (1983) Compliance-gainingand power in persuasion. In R. Bostrom (ed.), Communication Yearbook, 7, pp. 105–145. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
52.
Wish, M. (1975) Subjects' expectations about their own interpersonal communication: A multidimensional approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1, 501–504.
53.
Wish, M., Deutsch, M. and Kaplan, S. (1976) Perceived dimensions of interpersonal relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 409–20.
