This paper describes investigations in the measurement of listeners' evaluations of spoken language. Lack of integration in research in this area has been due in part to the numerous measurement instruments used to assess such evaluative reactions. The paper reviews the development of past instruments, describes the design, analysis, and implementation of an omnibus measure, the Speech Evaluation Instrument (SEI), and interprets these findings in light of past research. The use of the SEI is recommended to researchers as a way to make findings of various studies more comparable. Although the development of the SEI was based on evaluation of linguistic diversity, its applicability to a wider range of speech phenomena is suggested.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Agheyisi, R. and Fishman, J. A. (1970) Language attitudes studies: A brief survey of methodological approaches. Anthropological Linguistics, 12, 131–57.
2.
Ball, P., Byrne, J., Giles, H., Berechree, P., Griffiths, J., MacDonald, H. and McKendrick, I. (1982) The restrospective speech halo effect: Some Australian data. Language and Communication, 2, 277–84.
3.
Berlo, D. K., Lemert, J. B. and Mertz, R. (1969) Dimensions for evaluating the acceptability of message sources. Public Opinion Quarterly, 33, 563–76.
4.
Bourhis, R. Y., Giles, H. and Tajfel, J. (1973) Language as a determinant of Welsh identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 447–60.
5.
Bradac, J. J., Bowers, J. W. and Courtright, J. A. (1979) Three language variables in communication research: Intensity, immediacy, and diversity. Human Communication Research, 5, 257–69.
6.
Bradac, J. J., Courtright, J. A., Schmidt, G. and Davies, R. A. (1976) The effects of perceived status and linguistic diversity upon judgments of speaker attributes and message effectiveness. Journal of Psychology, 93, 213–20.
7.
Bradac, J. J., Davies, R. A., Courtright, J. A., Desmond, R. J. and Murdock, J. J. (1977) Richness of vocabulary: An attributional analysis. Psychological Reports, 41, 1131–34.
8.
Bradac, J. J., Desmond, R. J. and Murdock, J. I. (1977) Diversity and density: Lexically determined evaluative and informational consequences of linguistic complexity. Communication Monographs, 44, 273–83.
9.
Bradac, J. J., Konsky, C. W. and Davies, R. A. (1976) Two studies of the effects of linguistic diversity upon judgments of communicator attributes and message effectiveness. Communication Monographs, 43, 70–79.
10.
Bradac, J. J. and Mulac, A. (1984) Attributional consequences of powerful and powerless speech styles in a crisis-intervention context. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 3, 1–20.
11.
Brown, B. L., Strong, W. J. and Rencher, A. C. (1975) Acoustic determinants of the perceptions of personality from speech. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 6, 11–32.
12.
Carranza, M. A. and Ryan, E. B. (1975) Evaluative reactions of bilingual Anglo and Mexican American adolescents towards speakers of English and Spanish. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 6, 83–104.
13.
Cattell, R. B. (1978) The scientific use of factor analysis in behavioral and life sciences.New York: Plenum.
14.
Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975) Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research.Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
15.
Gallois, C., Callan, V. J. and Johnstone, M. (1984) Personality judgements of Australian Aborigine and white speakers: Ethnicity, Sex, and Context. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 3, 39–58.
16.
Giles, H. (1971) Patterns of evaluation in reactions to RP, South Welsh, and Somerset accented speech. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 10, 280–81.
17.
Giles, H. and Powesland, P. F. (1975) Speech style and social evaluation.London: Academic Press.
18.
Giles, H. and Ryan, E. B. (1982) Prolegomena for developing a social psychological theory of language attitudes. In E. B. Ryan and H. Giles (eds), Attitudes towards language variation: Social and applied contexts.London: Edward Arnold.
19.
Harman, H. H. (1967) Modern Factor Analysis.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20.
Hopper, R. (1977) Language attitudes in the job interview. Communication Monographs, 44, 346–51.
21.
Hopper, R. and Williams, F. (1973) Speech characteristics and employability. Speech Monographs, 40, 296–302.
22.
Jackson, S. and Jacobs, S. (1983) Generalizing about messages: Suggestions for design and analysis of experiments. Human Communication Research, 9, 169–81.
23.
Lambert, W. E., Frankel, H. and Tucker, G. R. (1966) Judging personality through speech: A French-Canadian example. Journal of Communication, 16, 305–21.
24.
Lambert, W. E., Hodgson, R., Gardner, R. C. and Fillenbaum, S. (1960) Evaluational reactions to spoken languages. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60, 44–51.
25.
McCroskey, J. C. and Young, T. J. (1981) Ethos and credibility: The construct and its measurement after three decades. Central States Speech Journal, 32, 24–34.
26.
Mulac, A. (1975) Evaluation of the speech dialect attitudinal scale. Speech Monographs, 42, 184–89.
27.
Mulac, A. (1976) Assessment and application of the revised speech dialect attitudinal scale. Communication Monographs, 43, 238–45.
28.
Mulac, A., Hanley, T. D. and Prigge, D. Y. (1974) Effects of phonological speech foreignness upon three dimensions of attitude of selected American listeners. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 60, 411–20.
29.
Mulac, A. and Lundell, T. L. (1980) Differences in perceptions created by syntactic–semantic productions of male and female speakers. Communication Monographs, 47, 111–18.
30.
Mulac, A. and Lundell, T. L. (1982) An empirical test of the gender-linked language effect in a public speaking setting. Language and Speech, 25, 243–56.
31.
Mulac, A. and Rudd, M. J. (1977) Effects of selected American regional dialects upon regional audience members. Communication Monographs, 44, 185–95.
32.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978) Psychometric theory.New York: McGraw-Hill.
33.
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J. and Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957) Measurement of meaning.Urbana: The University of Illinois Press.
34.
Ryan, E. B. and Carranza, M. (1975) Evaluative reactions of adolescents toward speakers of standard English and Mexican American accented English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 855–63.
35.
Ryan, E. B. and Carranza, M. (1980) Language attitudes and other cultural attitudes of bilingual Mexican American adolescents. Ethnicity, 7, 191–202.
36.
Ryan, E. B., Carranza, M. and Moffie, R. W. (1977) Reactions toward varying degrees of accentedness in the speech of Spanish–English bilinguals. Language and Speech, 20, 267–73.
37.
Ryan, E. B. and Giles, H. (1982) Attitudes towards language variation: Social and applied contexts.London: Edward Arnold.
38.
Ryan, E. B., Giles, H. and Sebastian, R. J. (1982) An integrative perspective for the study of attitudes towards language variation. In E. B. Ryan & H. Giles (eds), Attitudes towards language variation: Social and applied contexts.London: Edward Arnold.
39.
Strongman, K. and Woosley, J. (1967) Stereotyped reactions to regional accents. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 6, 164–67.
40.
Thakerar, J. N. and Giles, H. (1981) They are—so they spoke: noncontent speech stereotypes. Language and Communication, 1, 255–61.
41.
Tucker, G. R. and Lambert, W. E. (1969) White and Negro listeners' reactions to various American-English dialects. Social Forces, 47, 463–68.
42.
Whitehead, J. L., Jr. (1968) Factors of source credibility. Quarterly Journal of Speech; 54, 59–63.
43.
Whitehead, J. L., Williams, F., Civikly, J. M. and Albino, J. W. (1974) Latitude of attitude in ratings of dialect variations. Speech Monographs, 41, 397–407.
44.
Williams, F. (1970) Psychological correlates of speech characteristics: On sounding “disadvantaged”. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 13, 472–88.
45.
Williams, F. (1976) Explorations of the linguistic attitudes of teachers.Rowley, Mass.: Newbury.
46.
Williams, F., Whitehead, J. L. and Miller, L. (1972) Relations between attitudes and teacher expectancy. American Educational Research Journal, 9, 263–77.
