Can We Be Honest? Cognition,Intention,Speech Production,and the Future of Deception Research

Abstract

The last many years have given us clear and startling insights into human cognition and the process of human speech production. Yet much of current deception research eschews such revelations. Specifically, many deception scholars continue to presume a top-down, sequential-stepwise, selection-based speech production model that begins with a singular intent-to-deceive and ends with selection between binary discourse options—truth versus lie—that then are instantiated as communicative behavior. Unfortunately, such a model lacks goodness-of-fit with theory and research in speech production, cognitive psychology, and neurolinguistics. What's more, the presumptive truth/lie binary that dominates both experimental designs and research rationales bears little resemblance to the actual discourse patterns observed when people are allowed to freely generate responses to truth-problematic contexts. In this essay, we do three things. First, we review classic and current work in speech production. Second, we revisit the intentional states propositions of a recent theory of deceptive message production—Information Manipulation Theory 2—along with illustrative discourse examples from our own data. Finally, we entreat deception scholars to move our field forward in the future to a more fruitful place.

Keywords

deception speech production cognition intention

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baars

B. J.

Franklin

(2007). An architectural model of conscious and unconscious brain functions: Global workspace theory and IDA. Neural Networks, 20(9), 955–961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2007.09.013

Baddeley

(2007). Working memory, thought, and action. Oxford University Press.

Bessarabova

(2014). The effects of culture and situational features on in-group favoritism manifested as deception. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 39, 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2013.09.001

Brown

Levinson

(1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.

Buller

D. B.

Burgoon

J. K.

Buslig

Roiger

(1996). Testing interpersonal deception theory: The language of interpersonal deception. Communication Theory, 6(3), 268–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1996.tb00129.x

Buller

D. B.

Burgoon

J. K.

White

C. H.

Ebesu

A. S.

(1994). Interpersonal deception: VII. Behavioral profiles of falsification, equivocation, and concealment. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13(4), 366–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X94134002

Burgoon

J. K.

(2015). When is deceptive message production more effortful than truth-telling? A baker’s dozen of moderators. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1965. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.011965

Burgoon

J. K.

Buller

D. B.

Guerrero

L. K.

Afifi

W. A.

Feldman

C. M.

(1996). Interpersonal deception: XII. Information management dimensions underlying deceptive and truthful messages. Communication Monographs, 63(1), 50–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759609376374

Burgoon

J. K.

Levine

T. R.

(2010). Advances in deception detection. In S.W. Smith & S.R. Wilson (Eds.), New directions in interpersonal communication research (pp. 201–220). Sage Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483349619.n10

10.

Chang

(2002). Symbolically speaking: A connectionist model of sentence production. Cognitive Science, 26(5), 609–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(02)00079-4

11.

Chang

Dell

G. S.

Bock

(2006). Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review, 113(2), 234–272. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.234

12.

Dell

G. S.

Chang

(2014). The P-chain: relating sentence production and its disorders to comprehension and acquisition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 369(1634), 20120394. https://doi.org/10.1098rstb.2012.0394

13.

Dell

G. S.

Chang

Griffin

Z. M.

(1999). Connectionist models of language production: Lexical access and grammatical encoding. Cognitive Science, 23(4), 517–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(99)00014-2

14.

Dillard

J. P.

(1990). A goal-driven model of interpersonal influence. In Dillard

J. P.

(Ed.), Seeking compliance: The production of interpersonal influence messages (pp. 41–56). Gorsuch-Scarisbrick.

15.

Ekman

(1985). Telling lies. W. W. Norton.

16.

Ekman

Friesen

W. V.

(1969). Nonverbal leakage and clues to deception. Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes, 32(1), 88–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1969.11023575

17.

Fairs

Michelas

Dufour

Strijkers

(2021). The same ultra-rapid parallel brain dynamics underpin the production and perception of speech. Cerebral Cortex Communications, 2(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/texcom/tgab040

18.

Goffman

(1955). On face-work. Psychiatry, 18(3), 213–231. https://doi.org10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008 https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008

19.

Greene

J. O.

Geiman

K. L.

Pruim

D. E.

(2019). Implications of some “obvious truths” for building theories of deceptive message formulation and production. In Docan-Morgan

(Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of deceptive communication (pp. 129–143). Palgrave MacMillan.

20.

Grice

H. P.

(1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole

Morgan

J. L.

(Eds.), Syntax and semantics, Speech Acts (Vol. 3, pp. 41–58). Academic Press.

21.

Hancock

Birnholtz

Bazarova

N. (Natalie)

Guillory

Perlin

Amos

(2009). Butler lies: Awareness, deception and design. In Proc. ACM CHI (p. 526). https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518782

22.

Hauch

Sporer

S. L.

Michael

S. W.

Meissner

C. A.

(2016). Does training improve the detection of deception? A meta-analysis. Communication Research, 43(3), 283–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650214534974

23.

Herrmann

(1983). Speech and situation: A psychological conception of situated speaking. Springer-Verlag.

24.

Hovy

E. H.

(1990). Pragmatics and natural language generation. Artificial Intelligence, 43(2), 153–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(90)90084-D

25.

Kemmerer

(2019). From blueprints to brain maps: The status of the Lemma model in cognitive neuroscience. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(9), 1085–1116. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2018.1537498

26.

Konopka

A. E.

Meyer

Forest

T. A.

(2018). Planning to speak in L1 and L2. Cognitive Psychology, 102, 72–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.12.003

27.

Levelt

W. J. M.

(1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Massachusetts Institution of Technology.

28.

Levelt

W. J. M.

Roelofs

Meyer

A. S.

(1999). A theory of lexical access inspeech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99001776

29.

Littlefield

M. M.

Dietz

M. J.

Fitzgerald

Knudsen

K. J.

Tonks

(2015). Being asked to tell an unpleasant truth about another person activates anterior insula and medial prefrontal cortex. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00553 https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00553

30.

McCornack

S. A.

(1992). Information manipulation theory. Communication Monographs, 59(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759209376245

31.

McCornack

S. A.

(1997). The generation of deceptive messages: Laying the groundwork for a viable theory of interpersonal deception. In Greene

J. O.

(Ed.), Message production: Advances in communication theory (pp. 91–126). Lawrence Erlbaum.

32.

McCornack

Morrison

Paik

Wisner

Zhu

(2014). Information manipulation theory 2: A propositional theory of deceptive discourse production. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(4), 348–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X14534656

33.

Morrison

Ferrara

Klein

Bisson

(2004). “The truth shall set You free”: Exploring the difficulty in generating truthful and deceptive messages [Paper presentation]. In Annual meeting of the international communication association, New Orleans, LA, USA.

34.

Morrison

McCornack

S. A.

Deverell

W. T.

Zhu

(2024). Predicting when people will deceive: IMT2 and The Information Manipulation Probability Curve [Paper presentation]. In Annual meeting of the national communication association, New Orleans, LA, USA.

35.

Morrison

McCornack

S. A.

Deverell

W. T.

Zhu

Temple

(2020, virtual conference). Where have all the liars gone? Examining situational complexity and the inclusion of false information within discourse [Paper presentation]. In Annual meeting of the national communication association.

36.

Nii

H. P.

(1986). The blackboard model of problem-solving and the evolution of blackboard architectures. Artificial Intelligence Magazine, 7(2), 38–53. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v7i2.537

37.

Nii

H. P.

(1989). Blackboard systems. In Barr

Cohen

P. R.

Feigenbaum

E. A.

(Eds.), The handbook of artificial intelligence (Vol. 4, pp. 1–82). Addison-Wesley.

38.

O’Keefe

B. J.

(1987). Models of functional communication competence: A rational alternative to strategy repertoires [Paper presentation]. In Annual meeting of the speech communication association, Boston, MA, USA.

39.

O’Keefe

B. J.

(1988). The logic of message design: Individual differences in reasoning about communication. Communication Monographs, 55(1), 80. https://doi-org.proxy1.cl.msu.edu/10.1080/03637758809376159

40.

O’Keefe

B. J.

Lambert

B. L.

(1995). Managing the flow of ideas: A local management approach to message design. In Burleson

(Ed.), Communication yearbook 18 (pp. 54–82). Sage.

41.

Papafragou

Grigoroglou

(2019). The role of conceptualization during language production: Evidence from event encoding. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 34(9), 1117–1128. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2019.1589540

42.

Schegloff

E. A.

Sacks

(1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289–327. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289

43.

Serota

Levine

(2014). A Few Prolific Liars. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 34(2), 138–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X14528804

44.

Sporer

S. L.

Schwandt

(2007). Moderators of nonverbal indicators of deception: A meta-analytic synthesis. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 13(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.13.1.1

45.

Srour

(2022). The general theory of deception: A disruptive theory of lie production, prevention, and detection. Psychological Review, 130(5), 1289–1309. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000389

46.

Strijkers

Costa

(2016). On words and brains: Linking psycholinguistics with neural dynamics in speech production. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(4), 524–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2016.1158845

47.

Suchotzki

Verschuere

Van Bockstaele

Ben-Shakhar

Crombez

(2017). Lying takes time: A meta-analysis on reaction time measures of deception. Psychological Bulletin, 143(4), 428–453. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000087

48.

Turner

R. E.

Edgley

Olmstead

(1975). Information control in conversations: Honesty is not always the best policy. Kansas Journal of Sociology, 11(1), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.17161/STR.1808.6098

49.

Vrij

(2000). Detecting lies and deceit: The psychology of lying and implication for professional practice. John Wiley & Sons.

50.

Vrij

Fisher

Mann

Leal

(2006). Detecting deception by manipulating cognitive load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(4), 141–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.02.003

51.

Walczyk

J. J.

Harris

L. L.

Duck

T. K.

Mulay

(2014). A social-cognitive framework for understanding serious lies: Activation-decision-construction-action theory. New Ideas in Psychology, 34, 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2014.03.001

52.

Zipf

G. K.

(1949). Human behaviour and the principle of least effort: An introduction to human ecology. Addison-Wesley.