Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Latent semantic similarity (LSS) is a measure of the similarity of information exchanges in a conversation. Challenging the assumption that higher LSS bears more positive psychological meaning, we propose that this association might depend on the type of conversation people have. On the one hand, the share-mind perspective would predict that higher LSS should be associated with more positive emotional experiences across the board. The broaden-and-build theory, on the other hand, would predict that higher LSS should be inversely associated with more positive emotional experiences specifically in pleasant conversations. Linear mixed modeling based on conversations among 50 long-term married couples supported the latter prediction. That is, partners experienced greater positive emotions when their overall information exchanges were more dissimilar in pleasant (but not conflict) conversations. This work highlights the importance of context in understanding the emotional correlates of LSS and exemplifies how modern natural language processing tools can be used to evaluate competing theory-driven hypotheses in social psychology.

Keywords

latent semantic similarity emotional experiences dyadic interaction marriage broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions shared mind

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ackerman

R. A.

Kenny

D. A.

(2016). APIMPowerR: An interactive tool for actor-partner interdependence model power analysis [Computer software]. https://robert-a-ackerman.shinyapps.io/APIMPowerRdis/

Babcock

M. J.

V. P.

Ickes

(2014). Latent semantic similarity and language style matching in initial dyadic interactions. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(1), 78–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X13499331

Baden

Pipal

Schoonvelde

Van Der Velden

M. A. C. G.

(2022). Three gaps in computational text analysis methods for social sciences: A research agenda. Communication Methods and Measures, 16(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2021.2015574

Bierstetel

S. J.

Farrell

A. K.

Briskin

J. L.

Harvey

M. W.

Gable

S. L.

Ickes

Lin

W.-F.

Orina

M. M.

Saxbe

Simpson

J. A.

V. P.

Slatcher

R. B.

(2020). Associations between language style matching and relationship commitment and satisfaction: An integrative data analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37(8–9), 2459–2481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407520923754

Bietti

L. M.

(2010). Sharing memories, family conversation and interaction. Discourse & Society, 21(5), 499–523. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926510373973

Biggiogera

Boateng

Hilpert

Vowels

Bodenmann

Neysari

Nussbeck

Kowatsch

(2021). BERT Meets LIWC exploring state-of-the-art language models for predicting communication behavior in couples’ conflict interactions. Companion Publication of the 2021 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (pp. 385–389).

Borelli

J. L.

Klemfuss

J. Z.

Hollas

(2019). Language style matching in preschooler–adult dyads: Associations with dyad familiarity and children’s age. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 38(5–6), 787–797. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X19853317

Bowen

J. D.

Winczewski

L. A.

Collins

N. L.

(2017). Language style matching in romantic partners’ conflict and support interactions. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 36(3), 263–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X16666308

Boyd

R. L.

Ashokkumar

Seraj

Pennebaker

(2022). February 1). The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC-22. University of Texas at Austin.

10.

Boyd

R. L.

Schwartz

H. A.

(2021). Natural language analysis and the psychology of verbal behavior: The past, present, and future states of the field. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 40(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X20967028

11.

Brinberg

Ram

(2021). Do new romantic couples use more similar language over time? Evidence from intensive longitudinal text messages. Journal of Communication, 71(3), 454–477. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab012

12.

Chandrasekaran

Mago

(2021). Evolution of semantic similarity—A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(2), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1145/3440755

13.

Chen

K.-H.

Brown

C. L.

Wells

J. L.

Rothwell

E. S.

Otero

M. C.

Levenson

R. W.

Fredrickson

B. L.

(2020). Physiological linkage during shared positive and shared negative emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 121(5), 1029. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000337

14.

Chung

C. K.

Pennebaker

J. W.

(2018). What do we know when we LIWC a person? Text analysis as an assessment tool for traits, personal concerns and life stories. In The sage handbook of personality and individual differences (pp. 341–360). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526451163.n16

15.

Demszky

Yang

Yeager

D. S.

Bryan

C. J.

Clapper

Chandhok

Eichstaedt

J. C.

Hecht

Jamieson

Johnson

Jones

Krettek-Cobb

Lai

JonesMitchell

Ong

D. C.

Dweck

C. S.

Gross

J. J.

Pennebaker

J. W.

(2023). Using large language models in psychology. Nature Reviews Psychology, 2(11), 688–701. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-023-00241-5

16.

Devlin

Chang

M.-W.

Lee

Toutanova

(2019). BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Burstein

Doran

Solorio

(Eds.), Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) (pp. 4171–4186). Association for Computational Linguistics.

17.

DiMaggio

(2015). Adapting computational text analysis to social science (and vice versa). Big Data & Society, 2(2), 2053951715602908. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715602908

18.

Doré

B. P.

Morris

R. R.

(2018). Linguistic synchrony predicts the immediate and lasting impact of text-based emotional support. Psychological Science, 29(10), 1716–1723. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618779971

19.

Feeney

J. A.

Karantzas

G. C.

(2017). Couple conflict: Insights from an attachment perspective. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 60–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.04.017

20.

Finkel

E. J.

Simpson

J. A.

Eastwick

P. W.

(2017). The psychology of close relationships: Fourteen core principles. Annual Review of Psychology, 68(1), 383–411. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044038

21.

Fredrickson

B. L.

(2013). Positive emotions broaden and build. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 47, pp. 1–53). Elsevier.

22.

Gable

S. L.

Reis

H. T.

(2010). Good news! capitalizing on positive events in an interpersonal context. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 42, pp. 195–257). Elsevier.

23.

Gable

S. L.

Reis

H. T.

Impett

E. A.

Asher

E. R.

(2004). What do you do when things go right? The intrapersonal and interpersonal benefits of sharing positive events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 228–245. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.228

24.

Gallois

Vanman

E. J.

Kalokerinos

E. K.

Greenaway

K. H.

(2021). Emotion and its management: The lens of language and social psychology. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 40(1), 42–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X20966722

25.

Giles

(2016). Communication accommodation theory: Negotiating personal relationships and social identities across contexts. Cambridge University Press.

26.

Giner-Sorolla

Montoya

A. K.

Reifman

Carpenter

Lewis

N. A.

Aberson

C. L.

Bostyn

D. H.

Conrique

B. G.

B. W.

Schoemann

A. M.

Soderberg

(2024). Power to detect what? Considerations for planning and evaluating sample size. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 28(3), 276–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683241228328

27.

Gottman

J. M.

(2017). The roles of conflict engagement, escalation, and avoidance in marital interaction: A longitudinal view of five types of couples. In Zukauskiene

(Ed.), Interpersonal development (1st ed., pp. 359–368). Routledge.

28.

Gottman

J. M.

Gottman

(2017). The natural principles of love. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 9(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12182

29.

Grimmer

Roberts

M. E.

Stewart

B. M.

(2022). Text as data: A new framework for machine learning and the social sciences. Princeton University Press.

30.

Haase

C. M.

(2023). Emotion regulation in couples across adulthood. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology, 5(1), 399–421. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-devpsych-120621-043836

31.

Harris

C. B.

Barnier

A. J.

Sutton

Keil

P. G.

(2014). Couples as socially distributed cognitive systems: Remembering in everyday social and material contexts. Memory Studies, 7(3), 285–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698014530619

32.

Harwood

Tracy

(2021). Language—and—social psychology: Epilogue. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 40(1), 172–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X20962846

33.

Higgins

E. T.

Rossignac-Milon

Echterhoff

(2021). Shared reality: From sharing-is-believing to merging minds. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 30(2), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721421992027

34.

Hirst

Echterhoff

(2012). Remembering in conversations: The social sharing and reshaping of memories. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(2012), 55–79. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100340

35.

Hittner

E. F.

Haase

C. M.

(2021). Empathy in context: Socioeconomic status as a moderator of the link between empathic accuracy and well-being in married couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(5), 1633–1654. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407521990750

36.

Hittner

E. F.

Rim

K. L.

Haase

C. M.

(2019). Socioeconomic status as a moderator of the link between reappraisal and anxiety: Laboratory-based and longitudinal evidence. Emotion, 19(8), 1478–1489. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000539

37.

Horn

A. B.

Meier

(2022). Language in close relationships. In Boyd

R. L.

Deghani

(Eds.), The Atlas of Language Analysis in Psychology (pp. 102–124). The Guilford Press. https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/239098 .

38.

Ireland

M. E.

Slatcher

R. B.

Eastwick

P. W.

Scissors

L. E.

Finkel

E. J.

Pennebaker

J. W.

(2011). Language style matching predicts relationship initiation and stability. Psychological Science, 22(1), 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610392928

39.

Jackson

J. C.

Watts

List

J.-M.

Puryear

Drabble

Lindquist

K. A.

(2021). From text to thought: How analyzing language can advance psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(3), 805–826. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211004899

40.

Kenny

D. A.

Kashy

D. A.

Cook

W. L.

(2020). Dyadic data analysis. Guilford Publications.

41.

Kjell

Giorgi

Schwartz

H. A.

(2023). The text-package: An R-package for analyzing and visualizing human language using natural language processing and transformers. Psychological Methods, 28(6), 1478–1498. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000542

42.

Kyprianou

Graebner

M. E.

Rindova

(2015). Strategic conversations: Methods for data collection and analysis. In Elsbach

Kramer

(Eds.), The handbook of qualitative organizational research (pp. 272–285). Routledge.

43.

Landauer

T. K.

Dumais

S. T.

(1997). A solution to plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104(2), 211–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.211

44.

Lench

H. C.

Flores

S. A.

Bench

S. W.

(2011). Discrete emotions predict changes in cognition, judgment, experience, behavior, and physiology: A meta-analysis of experimental emotion elicitations. Psychological Bulletin, 137(5), 834–855. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024244

45.

Levenson

R. W.

(2024). Two’s company: Biobehavioral research with dyads. Biological Psychology, 185, 108719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2023.108719

46.

Levenson

R. W.

Gottman

J. M.

(1983). Marital interaction: Physiological linkage and affective exchange. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(3), 587–597. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.587

47.

Levenson

R. W.

Ruef

A. M.

(2007). Continuous measurement of emotion. In Coan

J. A.

Allen

J. J. B.

(Eds.), Handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment (pp. 286–297). Oxford University Press.

48.

Zhang

Long

Xie

Zhang

(2023). Towards general text embeddings with multi-stage contrastive learning (arXiv:2308.03281). arXiv.

49.

Zhao

Moens

M.-F

. (2022). A brief overview of universal sentence representation methods: A linguistic view. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(3), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1145/3482853

50.

Locke

H. J.

Wallace

K. M.

(1959). Short marital-adjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity. Marriage and Family Living, 21(3), 251–255. https://doi.org/10.2307/348022

51.

Meier

Milek

Mehl

M. R.

Nussbeck

F. W.

Neysari

Bodenmann

Martin

Zemp

Horn

A. B.

(2021). I blame you, I hear you: Couples’ pronoun use in conflict and dyadic coping. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(11), 3265–3287. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211029721

52.

Meier

Otero

S. X.

Stephens

J. E.

C.-W.

Haase

C. M.

(2024). Unraveling the experience of affection across marital and friendship interactions. Affective ScienceScience, 6(1), 104–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42761-024-00277-7

53.

Meier

Stephens

J. E.

Haase

C. M.

(2024). Feelings in words: Emotion word use and cardiovascular reactivity in marital interactions. Emotion, 24(3), 733–744. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001299

54.

Muennighoff

Tazi

Magne

Reimers

(2023). MTEB: Massive text embedding benchmark. Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics(pp. 2014–2037).

55.

Nakanishi

Okada

Tanaka

Ogasawara

Ohashi

(2017). A topic extraction method on the flow of conversation in meetings. 2017 6th IIAI International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI) (pp. 351–356).

56.

Niederhoffer

K. G.

Pennebaker

J. W.

(2002). Linguistic style matching in social interaction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 21(4), 337–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/026192702237953

57.

Pasupathi

Lucas

Coombs

(2002). Conversational functions of autobiographical remembering: Long-married couples talk about conflicts and pleasant topics. Discourse Processes, 34(2), 163–192. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950DP3402_3

58.

Planalp

(1993). Friends’ and acquaintances’ conversations II: Coded differences. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10(3), 339–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407593103003

59.

Reimers

Gurevych

(2019). Sentence-BERT: Sentence embeddings using siamese BERT-networks. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) (pp. 3982–3992).

60.

Reis

H. T.

Regan

Lyubomirsky

(2021). Interpersonal chemistry: What is it, how does it emerge, and how does it operate? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(2), 530–558.

61.

Roberts

M. E.

Stewart

B. M.

Tingley

Lucas

Leder-Luis

Gadarian

S. K.

Albertson

Rand

D. G.

(2014). Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 1064–1082. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12103

62.

Rogers

Kovaleva

Rumshisky

(2020). A primer in BERTology: What we know about how BERT works. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 8, 842–866. https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00349

63.

Rossignac-Milon

Bolger

Zee

K. S.

Boothby

E. J.

Higgins

E. T.

(2021). Merged minds: Generalized shared reality in dyadic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(4), 882–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000266

64.

Rossignac-Milon

Higgins

E. T.

(2018). Epistemic companions: Shared reality development in close relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology, 23, 66–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.01.001

65.

Rusbult

C. E.

Lange

P. A. M. V.

(2003). Interdependence, interaction, and relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 351–375. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145059

66.

Sap

Jafarpour

Choi

Smith

N. A.

Pennebaker

J. W.

Horvitz

(2022). Quantifying the narrative flow of imagined versus autobiographical stories. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(45), e2211715119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2211715119

67.

Shiota

M. N.

Campos

Oveis

Hertenstein

M. J.

Simon-Thomas

Keltner

(2017). Beyond happiness: Building a science of discrete positive emotions. American Psychologist, 72(7), 617–643. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040456

68.

Talarico

J. M.

Berntsen

Rubin

D. C.

(2009). Positive emotions enhance recall of peripheral details. Cognition and Emotion, 23(2), 380–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930801993999

69.

Templeton

E. M.

Wheatley

(2023). Listening fast and slow. Current Opinion in Psychology, 53, 101658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101658

70.

Vieth

Rothman

A. J.

Simpson

J. A.

(2022). Friendship loss and dissolution in adulthood: A conceptual model. Current Opinion in Psychology, 43, 171–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.07.007

71.

Wegner

D. M.

Giuliano

Hertel

P. T.

(1985). Cognitive interdependence in close relationships. In Ickes

(Ed.), Compatible and incompatible relationships (pp. 253–276). Springer New York.

72.

Wells

J. L.

Haase

C. M.

Rothwell

E. S.

Naugle

K. G.

Otero

M. C.

Brown

C. L.

Lai

Chen

K.-H.

Connelly

D. E.

Grimm

K. J.

Levenson

R. W.

Fredrickson

B. L.

(2022). Positivity resonance in long-term married couples: Multimodal characteristics and consequences for health and longevity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 123(5), 983–1003. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000385

73.

West

T. V.

(2013). Repeated measures with dyads. In Simpson

J. A.

Campbell

(Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Close Relationships (pp. 731–749). Oxford University Press.

74.

Wolf

Tomasello

(2025). A shared intentionality account of uniquely human social bonding. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 20(2), 264–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916231201795

75.

Wood

Lipson

Zhao

Niedenthal

(2021). Forms and functions of affective synchrony. In Robinson

M. D.

Thomas

L. E.

(Eds.), Handbook of embodied psychology: Thinking, feeling, and acting (pp. 381–402). Springer International Publishing.

76.

Yeomans

Boland

F. K.

Collins

H. K.

Abi-Esber

Brooks

A. W.

(2023). A practical guide to conversation research: How to study what people say to each other. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 6(4), 25152459231183919. https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459231183919

77.

C.-W.

Chang

J.-H.

(2023). Believe, express, and enjoy: Utility beliefs about social emotion expression consistently predict satisfactory outcomes. Motivation and Emotion, 47(3), 399–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-023-10009-2

78.

Zaki

(2020). Integrating empathy and interpersonal emotion regulation. Annual Review of Psychology, 71(1), 517–540. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050830

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB

The More Similar,the Better? Associations Between Latent Semantic Similarity and Emotional Experiences Differ Across Conversation Contexts

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material