This research assessed whether the color of a female politician’s clothing affected perceptions of her verbal aggression. In the context of Kamala Harris attacking Donald Trump, a 2 (color: pink vs. gray) × 2 (verbal aggression: low vs. high) experiment was conducted. While wearing pink, participants perceived Harris as more competent and reported more message-consistent perceptions if she used low rather than high verbal aggression. While wearing gray, high rather than low verbal aggression was perceived more favorably.
BemS. L. (1981). Bem sex role inventory professional manual. Consulting Psychologists Press.
2.
BennettC. P.HagueA.PerkinsC. (1991). The use of Baker-miller pink in police operational and university experimental situations in britain. International Journal of Biosocial & Medical Research, 13(1), 118–127.
3.
BideauxK. (2018, September). Rethinking Baker-Miller Pink through gender studies. Proceedings of the International Colour Association (AIC) Conference, 2018 (pp. 727–732).
4.
BittnerA.Goodyear-GrantE. (2017). Sex isn’t gender: Reforming concepts and measurements in the study of public opinion. Political Behavior, 39(4), 1019–1041. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-017-9391-y
5.
BlighM. C.KohlesJ. C. (2008). Negotiating gender role expectations: Rhetorical leadership and women in the US senate. Leadership, 4(4), 381–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715008095187
6.
BullP.WellsP. (2012). Adversarial discourse in prime minister’s questions. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 31(1), 30–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X11425034
7.
BurgoonM. (1995). Language expectancy theory: Elaboration, explication, and extension. In BergerC. R.BurgoonM. (Eds.), Communication and social influence processes (pp. 29–52). Michigan State University Press.
8.
BurgoonM. (1996). (Non)compliance with disease prevention and control messages: Communication correlates and psychological predictors. Journal of Health Psychology, 1(3), 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910539600100303
9.
BurgoonM.BirkT. S.HallJ. R. (1991). Compliance and satisfaction with physician-patient communication: An expectancy theory interpretation of gender differences. Human Communication Research, 18(2), 177–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1991.tb00543.x
10.
BurgoonM.DenningV. P.RobertsL. (2002). Language expectancy theory. In DillardJ. P.PfauM. (Eds.), The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 117–136). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412976046.n7
11.
BurgoonM.DillardJ. P.DoranN. E. (1983). Friendly or unfriendly persuasion: The effects of violations of expectations by males and females. Human Communication Research, 10(2), 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1983.tb00018.x
12.
BurgoonM.JonesS. B.StewartD. (1975). Toward a message-centered theory of persuasion: Three empirical investigations of language intensity. Human Communication Research, 1(3), 240–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00271.x
13.
BurgoonM.MillerG. R. (2019). An expectancy interpretation of language and persuasion. In GilesH.St. ClairR. N. (Eds.), Recent advances in language communication and social psychology (pp. 199–229). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429436178-8
14.
BurgoonM.ParrotR.BurgoonJ. K.BirkT.PfauM.CokerR. (1990). Primary care physicians’ selection of verbal compliance-gaining strategies. Health Communication, 2(1), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327027hc0201_2
15.
BystromD. (2003). On the way to the white house: Communication strategies for women candidates. In WatsonR. P.GordonA. (Eds.), Anticipating madam president (pp. 95–105). Lynne Rienner Publishers.
16.
BystromD. (2006). Advertising, web sites, and media coverage: Gender and communication along the campaign trail. In CarrollS. J.FoxR. L. (Eds.), Gender and elections: Shaping the future of American politics (pp. 169–188). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807282.008
CarliL. L. (2004). Gender effects on social influence. In SeiterJ. S.GassR. H. (Eds.), Readings in persuasion, social influence and compliance gaining (pp. 133–148). Allyn & Bacon.
19.
CavazzaN. (2017). The tone dilemma: Comparing the effects of flattery and verbal aggression in a political speech. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 36(5), 585–598. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X17698186
20.
ChangC. (2001). The impacts of emotion elicited by print political advertising on candidate evaluation. Media Psychology, 3(2), 91–118. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0302_01
21.
DolanK. (2004). The impact of candidate sex on evaluations of candidates for the U.S. House of representatives. Social Science Quarterly, 85(1), 206–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.08501015.x
22.
EaglyA. H.Johannesen-SchmidtM. C. (2001). The leadership styles of women and men. Journal of social issues, 57(4), 781–797. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00241
23.
ElliotA. J. (2019). A historically based review of empirical work on color and psychological functioning: Content, methods, and recommendations for future research. Review of General Psychology, 23(2), 177–200. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000170
FriedmanV. (2020, October 29). Why celebrities are wearing hot pink suits. New York Times.http://www.newyorktimes.com
27.
GenschowO.NollT.WänkeM.GersbachR. (2015). Does Baker-miller pink reduce aggression in prison detention cells? A critical empirical examination. Psychology, Crime & Law, 21(5), 482–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2014.989172
28.
GilliamJ. E. (1991). The effects of Baker-miller pink on physiological and cognitive behavior of emotionally disturbed and regular education students. Behavioral Disorders, 17(1), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874299101700103
29.
GilliamJ. E.UnruhD. (1988). The effects of Baker-miller pink on biological, physical and cognitive behaviors. Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine, 3(4), 202–206.
30.
GivhanR. (2007, July 20). Hillary Clinton's tentative dip into new neckline territory. Washington Post.http://www.washingtonpost.com
31.
GordonA.MillerJ. (2005). When stereotypes collide: Race/ethnicity, gender, and videostyle in congressional campaigns (Vol. 4). Peter Lang.
32.
HamiltonM. (1997). The phase interfaced omnistructure underlying the processing of persuasive messages. In BosterF. J.BarnettG. (Eds.), Progress in communication science (pp. 1–42). Ablex.
HamiltonM. A. (2012). Verbal aggression: Understanding the psychological antecedents and social consequences. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 31(1), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X11425032
35.
HamiltonM. A.HunterJ. E.BurgoonM. (1990). An empirical investigation of an axiomatic model of the relationship between language intensity and attitude change. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 9(4), 171–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X9094002
36.
HamiltonM. A.NowakK. L. (2010). Advancing a model of avatar evaluation and selection. PsychNology Journal, 8(1), 33–65.
37.
HamiltonM. A.StewartB. L. (1993). Extending an information processing model of language intensity effects. Communication Quarterly, 41(2), 231–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379309369882
38.
HamiltonM. A.ThompsonW. L. (1994). Testing an information processing account of message intensity effects. World Communication, 23, 1–14.
39.
HarpD.LokeJ.BachmannI. (2017). The spectacle of politics: Wendy davis, abortion, and pink shoes in the texas ‘fillybuster’. Journal of Gender Studies, 26(2), 227–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2016.1175924
40.
HayesA. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford.
41.
HessA. C.MelnykV. (2016). Pink or blue? The impact of gender cues on brand perceptions. European Journal of Marketing, 50(9/10), 1550–1574. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-11-2014-0723
42.
HuddyL.CapelosT. (2002). Gender stereotyping and candidate evaluation. In The social psychology of politics (pp. 29–53). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0569-3_2
43.
HurlbertA. C.LingY. (2007). Biological components of sex differences in color preference. Current Biology, 17(16), R623–R625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.022
44.
InfanteD. A. (1987). Aggressiveness. In McCroskeyJ. C.DalyJ. A. (Eds.), Personality and interpersonal communication (pp. 157–192). Sage.
45.
InfanteD. A.RiddleB. L.HorvathC. L.TumlinS. A. (1992). Verbal aggressiveness: Messages and reasons. Communication Quarterly, 40(2), 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379209369827
46.
InfanteD. A.WigleyC. J. (1986). Verbal aggressiveness: An interpersonal model and measure. Communication Monographs, 53(1), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758609376126
47.
JamiesonK. H. (1995). Beyond the double bind: Women and leadership. Oxford University Press.
48.
JonauskaiteD.DaelN.ChèvreL.AlthausB.TremeaA.CharalambidesL.MohrC. (2019). Pink for girls, red for boys, and blue for both genders: Colour preferences in children and adults. Sex Roles, 80(9), 630–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0955-z
49.
KinneyT. A.SmithB. A.DonzellaB. (2001). The influence of sex, gender, self-discrepancies, and self-awareness on anger and verbal aggressiveness among US college students. The Journal of Social Psychology, 141(2), 245–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540109600550
50.
KlingleR. S. (1993). Bringing time into physician compliance-gaining research: Toward a reinforcement expectancy theory of strategy effectiveness. Health Communication, 5(4), 283–308. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327027hc0504_3
51.
KlingleR. S.BurgoonM. (1995). Patient compliance and satisfaction with physician influence attempts: A reinforcement expectancy approach to compliance-gaining over time. Communication Research, 22(2), 148–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365095022002002
52.
KollerV. (2008). Not just a colour: Pink as a gender and sexuality marker in visual communication. Visual Communication, 7(4), 395–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357208096209
53.
LauR. R.SigelmanL.HeldmanC.BabbittP. (1999). The effects of negative political advertisements: A meta-analytic assessment. American Political Science Review, 93(4), 851–875. https://doi.org/10.2307/2586117
54.
LauR. R.SigelmanL.RovnerI. B. (2007). The effects of negative political campaigns: A meta-analytic reassessment. Journal of Politics, 69(4), 1176–1203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00618.x
55.
LeeperM. S. (1991). The impact of prejudice on female candidates: An experimental look at voter inference. American Politics Quarterly, 19(2), 248–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X9101900206
56.
LievenT.GrohmannB.HerrmannA.LandwehrJ. R.Van TilburgM. (2015). The effect of brand design on brand gender perceptions and brand preference. European Journal of Marketing, 49(1/2), 146–169. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-08-2012-0456
57.
McCroskeyJ. C.RichmondV. P. (1989). Bipolar scales. In EmmertP.BarkerL. L. (Eds.), Measurement of communication behavior (pp. 154–167). Longman.
58.
NauC.StewartC. O. (2014). Effects of verbal aggression and party identification bias on perceptions of political speakers. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(5), 526–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X13512486
59.
NauC.StewartC. O. (2018). Effects of gender and verbal aggression on perceptions of US political speakers. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 6(1), 127–148. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00006.nau
60.
PellegriniR. J.SchaussA. G.MillerM. E. (1981). Room color and aggression in a criminal detention holding cell: A test of the “tranquilizing pink” hypothesis. Journal of Othomolecular Psychiatry, 10(3), 174–181.
61.
PinkletonB. (1997). The effects of negative comparative political advertising on candidate evaluations and advertising evaluations: An exploration. Journal of Advertising, 26(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1997.10673515
62.
ReithingerS.GrabmaierC.HuckaufA.StefaniO.ProssA. (2017). The myth of Baker-miller pink: Effects of colored light on physiology, cognition, and emotion?Lux Europa, 2017, 182–186.
63.
SamekA. A. (2008). Political skin:(Un) covering the presidential candidates. Feminist Media Studies, 8(4), 426–429.
SchaussA. G. (1979). Tranquilizing effect of color reduces aggressive behavior and potential violence. Journal of Orthomolecular Psychiatry, 8(4), 218–221.
66.
SchaussA. G. (1985). The physiological effect of color on the suppression of human aggression: Research on Baker-miller pink. International Journal of Biosocial Research, 7(2), 55–64.
67.
SchlossK. B.PalmerS. E. (2014). The politics of color: Preferences for republican red versus democratic blue. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(6), 1481–1488. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0635-0
68.
SeiterJ. S.GassR. H. (2010). Aggressive communication in political contexts. In AvtgisT. A.RancerA. S. (Eds.), Arguments, aggression, and conflict: New directions in theory and research (pp. 217–240). Routledge.
69.
SilverN. C.Mc CulleyW. L.ChamblissL. N.CharlesC. M.SmithA. A.WaddellW. M.WinfieldE. B. (1988). Sex and racial differences in color and number preferences. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 66(1), 295–299. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1988.66.1.295
70.
SmithA. N.WatkinsM. B.BurkeM. J.ChristianM. S.SmithC. E.HallA.SimmsS. (2013). Gendered influence: A gender role perspective on the use and effectiveness of influence tactics. Journal of Management, 39(5), 1156–1183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313478183
71.
SnyderM. L. (1981). A nursing study on the effect of environmental color on behavior. International Journal for Biosocial Research, 2, 3–4.
72.
WadsworthA. J.PattersonP.KaidL. L.CullersG.MalcombD.LamirandL. (1987). “Masculine” vs.“feminine” strategies in political ads: Implications for female candidates. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 15(1-2), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909888709365261
73.
WinterN. J. (2010). Masculine republicans and feminine democrats: Gender and Americans’ explicit and implicit images of the political parties. Political Behavior, 32(4), 587–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9131-z
